M.Y.T.C. v. L.H.N.
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice Milman |
| Citation | 2020 BCSC 729 |
| Date | 12 May 2020 |
| Docket Number | E172700 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 practice notes
-
Crossley v. Vorell
...discrete aspects of the offer, it must be assessed globally with a view to whether the entire offer was reasonable: M.Y.T.C. v. L.H.N., 2020 BCSC 729 at para. 15; Wiwchar v. Wiwchar, 2021 BCSC 2001 at paras. 32-34. Given the unfavourable or problematic nature of certain of the elements of t......
-
Belpacific Excavating & Shoring Limited Partnership v. Crown and Mountain Creations Ltd.
...if an offer should have been accepted, courts must consider the entire offer and compare it to the overall result: M.Y.T.C. v. L.H.N., 2020 BCSC 729 at para. 15. This is particularly salient given the fact that Conwest was not substantially successful at [45]     &#......
-
M.Y.T.C. v. L.H.N.
...reasons”). [5]          In subsequent reasons dated May 12, 2020 and indexed as 2020 BCSC 729 (the “costs reasons”), Milman, J. made the following order for [29]      In summary, I am ordering that, s......
-
B.F.W. v F.P.
...The jurisprudence confirms that the entire offer must be compared with the overall result achieved: see, for example, M.Y.T.C. v. L.H.N., 2020 BCSC 729 at para. 29 The respondent's consistent position, both at the summary trial and in the litigation proceeding it, was that, other than durin......
Get Started for Free
9 cases
-
Crossley v. Vorell
...discrete aspects of the offer, it must be assessed globally with a view to whether the entire offer was reasonable: M.Y.T.C. v. L.H.N., 2020 BCSC 729 at para. 15; Wiwchar v. Wiwchar, 2021 BCSC 2001 at paras. 32-34. Given the unfavourable or problematic nature of certain of the elements of t......
-
Belpacific Excavating & Shoring Limited Partnership v. Crown and Mountain Creations Ltd.
...if an offer should have been accepted, courts must consider the entire offer and compare it to the overall result: M.Y.T.C. v. L.H.N., 2020 BCSC 729 at para. 15. This is particularly salient given the fact that Conwest was not substantially successful at [45]     &#......
-
M.Y.T.C. v. L.H.N.
...reasons”). [5]          In subsequent reasons dated May 12, 2020 and indexed as 2020 BCSC 729 (the “costs reasons”), Milman, J. made the following order for [29]      In summary, I am ordering that, s......
-
M.Y.T.C. v L.H.N.
...trial reasons are indexed as 2020 BCSC 414 (the “trial reasons”). 5 In subsequent reasons dated May 12, 2020 and indexed as 2020 BCSC 729 (the “costs reasons”), Milman, J. made the following order for costs: [29] In summary, I am ordering that, subject to any cos......
Get Started for Free
