M (T) v K (Z), 2021 ABQB 588
Judge | Honourable Madam Justice Bonnie L. Bokenfohr |
Neutral Citation | 2021 ABQB 588 |
Citation | 2021 ABQB 588 |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
Date | 27 July 2021 |
Docket Number | 4803 168033 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
2 practice notes
-
C.P. v A.P.,
...loss of employment resulting in the father's inability to pay. 29 Counsel for the Father provided the Court with the case of T.M. v. Z.K, 2021 ABQB 588 [“ T.M.”] which involved an application by the father to retroactively reduce child and spousal support. The facts of that case are similar......
-
Darmanin v Glowacki,
...bank deposits), did not continue through his incarceration, whether AISH- or employment-income based. 22 Here I follow TM v ZK, 2021 ABQB 588, where Bokenfohr J. concluded that incarceration can constitute a material change in the payor's circumstances -- particularly where the payor's inco......
2 cases
-
C.P. v A.P.,
...loss of employment resulting in the father's inability to pay. 29 Counsel for the Father provided the Court with the case of T.M. v. Z.K, 2021 ABQB 588 [“ T.M.”] which involved an application by the father to retroactively reduce child and spousal support. The facts of that case are similar......
-
Darmanin v Glowacki,
...bank deposits), did not continue through his incarceration, whether AISH- or employment-income based. 22 Here I follow TM v ZK, 2021 ABQB 588, where Bokenfohr J. concluded that incarceration can constitute a material change in the payor's circumstances -- particularly where the payor's inco......