M.E. v. R.
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Judge | Lauwers, Hourigan and Fairburn JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2020 ONCA 289 |
| Date | 23 June 2020 |
| Docket Number | C67498 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 1 ' 5, 2025)
...37.16, Huang v. Braga, 2020 ONCA 645, Evans v. Snieg, 2019 ONSC 7270, Hoang v. Mann Engineering Ltd., 2022 ONCA 82, M.E. v. Ontario, 2020 ONCA 289, Toronto (Police Service) v. L.D., 2018 ONCA 17, Sickinger v. Krek, 2016 ONCA 459, Langenecker v. Sauvé, 2011 ONCA 803, Ali v. Fruci, 2014 ONCA ......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 22 ' 26, 2020)
...that the listing for sale was an administrative error, and that the property therefore was not actually listed for sale. M.E. v. R., 2020 ONCA 289 [Lauwers, Hourigan and Fairburn The appellant, acting in person Domenico Polla, for the respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario Sco......
-
M.E. v. Ontario
...et al., 2019 ONSC 7325. In June 2020, this court upheld the dismissal of the contempt motion as well as the finding on costs: M.E. v. R., 2020 ONCA 289. Costs were again awarded against the appellant on the appeal from the dismissal of the contempt motion: M.E. v. R., 2020 ONCA 429. [5] At ......
-
M.E. et al. v. HMTQ et al.
...cause of action against C.A.S.T. alone. The Court of Appeal’s redacted reasons for decision are dated June 23, 2020 and reported at 2020 ONCA 289 (the “Appeal Materials Filed and Procedure Followed [6] Pursuant to rule 2.1.02(2), I directed that the summary procedure outlined by rule 2.1.01......
2 cases
-
M.E. v. Ontario
...et al., 2019 ONSC 7325. In June 2020, this court upheld the dismissal of the contempt motion as well as the finding on costs: M.E. v. R., 2020 ONCA 289. Costs were again awarded against the appellant on the appeal from the dismissal of the contempt motion: M.E. v. R., 2020 ONCA 429. [5] At ......
-
M.E. et al. v. HMTQ et al.
...cause of action against C.A.S.T. alone. The Court of Appeal’s redacted reasons for decision are dated June 23, 2020 and reported at 2020 ONCA 289 (the “Appeal Materials Filed and Procedure Followed [6] Pursuant to rule 2.1.02(2), I directed that the summary procedure outlined by rule 2.1.01......
2 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 1 ' 5, 2025)
...37.16, Huang v. Braga, 2020 ONCA 645, Evans v. Snieg, 2019 ONSC 7270, Hoang v. Mann Engineering Ltd., 2022 ONCA 82, M.E. v. Ontario, 2020 ONCA 289, Toronto (Police Service) v. L.D., 2018 ONCA 17, Sickinger v. Krek, 2016 ONCA 459, Langenecker v. Sauvé, 2011 ONCA 803, Ali v. Fruci, 2014 ONCA ......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 22 ' 26, 2020)
...that the listing for sale was an administrative error, and that the property therefore was not actually listed for sale. M.E. v. R., 2020 ONCA 289 [Lauwers, Hourigan and Fairburn The appellant, acting in person Domenico Polla, for the respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario Sco......
