Ma. v. Haniak
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Armstrong |
| Citation | 2017 BCSC 549 |
| Date | 31 March 2017 |
| Docket Number | M122025Docket: M133802Docket: M132280Docket: M132800 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
8 practice notes
-
Heyran v 0668403 B.C. Ltd
...payments are typically deducted from past and future income loss awards: Bennett v. Lopez, 2023 BCSC 1812 at para. 176; Ma v. Haniak, 2017 BCSC 549 at para. 353; Shongu v. Jing, 2016 BCSC 901 at para. 198; Sidhu v. Hiebert, 2022 BCSC 1024 at paras. 760–765. However, in the present case, the......
-
MacLeod v. Akoury
...they cite: Rogalsky v. Harrett, 2014 BCSC 1255; Sahota v. Choongh, 2014 BCSC 2415; Kyrylov v. Maroke, 2016 BCSC 2076; and Ma v. Haniak, 2017 BCSC 549. [128] I reject the defendants’ position that, generally, Ms. MacLeod’s problems – her loss of enjoyment of life – are the result of other fa......
-
Palmer v. Pozniak
...for the defendant urged me to reject Mr. McNeill’s report for the same reasons that his evidence was given little weight in Ma v. Haniak, 2017 BCSC 549 [Ma]. However, when asked about the Court’s conclusion in Ma during cross-examination, Mr. McNeil indicated that he was unfamiliar with the......
-
De Groot v. Heller
...such cross-examination, holding it to be inappropriate. In this regard I agreed with the comments of Justice Armstrong in Ma v. Haniak, 2017 BCSC 549, at para. 202:[202] Mr. McNeil has an unenviable record in this Court as highlighted by the authorities cited by the defendants. While those ......
Get Started for Free
8 cases
-
Heyran v 0668403 B.C. Ltd
...payments are typically deducted from past and future income loss awards: Bennett v. Lopez, 2023 BCSC 1812 at para. 176; Ma v. Haniak, 2017 BCSC 549 at para. 353; Shongu v. Jing, 2016 BCSC 901 at para. 198; Sidhu v. Hiebert, 2022 BCSC 1024 at paras. 760–765. However, in the present case, the......
-
MacLeod v. Akoury
...they cite: Rogalsky v. Harrett, 2014 BCSC 1255; Sahota v. Choongh, 2014 BCSC 2415; Kyrylov v. Maroke, 2016 BCSC 2076; and Ma v. Haniak, 2017 BCSC 549. [128] I reject the defendants’ position that, generally, Ms. MacLeod’s problems – her loss of enjoyment of life – are the result of other fa......
-
Palmer v. Pozniak
...for the defendant urged me to reject Mr. McNeill’s report for the same reasons that his evidence was given little weight in Ma v. Haniak, 2017 BCSC 549 [Ma]. However, when asked about the Court’s conclusion in Ma during cross-examination, Mr. McNeil indicated that he was unfamiliar with the......
-
De Groot v. Heller
...such cross-examination, holding it to be inappropriate. In this regard I agreed with the comments of Justice Armstrong in Ma v. Haniak, 2017 BCSC 549, at para. 202:[202] Mr. McNeil has an unenviable record in this Court as highlighted by the authorities cited by the defendants. While those ......
Get Started for Free
