Macaraeg v. E Care Contact Centers Ltd.: Shortcomings of the British Columbia Court of Appeal's Analysis

AuthorMarcus F. Mazzucco
PositionGraduates from the University of Victoria, Faculty of Law in 2010 and will be articling with the Ontario Ministries of Health and Long-Term Care and Health Promotion
Pages150-159
150 wAPPEAL VOLUME 15
CASE COMMENTARY
MACARAEG V. E CARE CONTACT CENTERS
LTD.:
SHORTCOMINGS OF THE
BRITISH COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEAL’S
ANALYSIS
By Marcus F. Mazzucco*
CITED: (2010) 15 Appeal 150-159
INTRODUCTION
At issue in Macaraeg v. E Care Contact Centers Ltd. (“Macaraeg (BCCA)”) was whether
rights conferred in employment standards legislation could be implied as a matter of law
into an employment contract and, if so implied, could then be enforced in a civil action.
e British Columbia Court of Appeal’s unanimous decision rejecting both of these posi-
tions is troubling for several reasons. First, by failing to distinguish between a civil action
arising from breach of contract and one arising from breach of statutory duty, it may be ar-
gued that the Court embarked upon a misguided analysis for determining whether rights
conferred by employment standards legislation can be implied into employment contracts.
Second, the Court’s assessment of the adequacy of the administrative structure in place to
enforce statutory employment rights is inconsistent with the object of employment stan-
dards legislation, as it fails to recognize the ways in which the current enforcement regime
insuciently protects employees’ interests and encourages the breach of minimum em-
ployment standards by unscrupulous employers. e decision creates several practical di-
culties for employees in British Columbia. In eect, it puts an onus on employees to know
their statutory rights so that they are in a position to either negotiate such rights into em-
ployment contracts as express terms (which can then be enforced in a civil action), or to
enforce them using existing statutory remedies.
* Marcus Mazzucco graduates from the University of Victoria, Faculty of Law in 2010 and will be articling with
the Ontario Ministries of Health and Long-Term Care and Health Promotion. He wrote this case commentary as
a second-year student. Marcus thanks Professor Judy Fudge for providing him with the opportunity to write this
commentary during her course on individual employment law.
1. Macaraeg v. E Care Contact Centers Ltd., 2008 BCCA 182 (QL) [Macaraeg (BCCA)].

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT