MacDonald Estate v. Martin and Rossmere Holdings (1970) Ltd., (1990) 121 N.R. 1 (SCC)

JudgeDickson, C.J.C., Wilson, La Forest, L'Heureux-Dubé, Sopinka, Gonthier and Cory, JJ.
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Case DateDecember 20, 1990
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations(1990), 121 N.R. 1 (SCC);[1990] 3 SCR 1235;1990 CanLII 32 (SCC);77 DLR (4th) 249;[1991] 1 WWR 705;121 NR 1;[1990] CarswellMan 233;AZ-91111018;EYB 1990-68602;JE 91-85;[1990] SCJ No 41 (QL);[1990] ACS no 41;24 ACWS (3d) 553;285 WAC 241;48 CPC (2d) 113;70 Man R (2d) 241

MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 121 N.R. 1 (SCC)

MLB headnote and full text

[French language version follows English language version]

[La version française vient à la suite de la version anglaise]

.........................

William Steward Arnold Martin (appellant) v. William Hamilton Gray, Administrator with Will annexed of the Estate of John Edwin MacDonald (respondent)

(21469)

Indexed As: MacDonald Estate v. Martin and Rossmere Holdings (1970) Ltd.

Supreme Court of Canada

Dickson, C.J.C., Wilson, La Forest, L'Heureux-Dubé, Sopinka, Gonthier and Cory, JJ.

December 20, 1990.

Summary:

The defendant Martin applied for an order that the plaintiff's solicitors of record be disqualified from acting for the plaintiff on the ground of conflict of interest. The alleged conflict arose when a young lawyer (Dangerfield) who acted as junior counsel for the defendant subsequently became employed with the plaintiff's solicitor's law firm.

The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench allowed the application and declared that the plaintiff's law firm was ineligible to continue to act for the plaintiff. The plaintiff appealed.

The Manitoba Court of Appeal, Monnin, C.J.M., dissenting, in a judgment reported 57 Man.R.(2d) 161, allowed the appeal. The defendant appealed.

The Supreme Court of Canada allowed the appeal, set aside the judgment of the Court of Appeal and restored the trial judgment. The court stated that Dangerfield possessed relevant confidential information and there was insufficient evidence that all reasonable measures were taken to rebut the strong inference of disclosure.

Barristers and Solicitors - Topic 1611

Relationship with client - Conflict of interests - Conduct of action against former client - The Supreme Court of Canada stated that "a lawyer who has relevant confidential information cannot act against his client or former client. In such a case the disqualification is automatic. No assurances or undertakings not to use the information will avail" - See paragraph 47.

Barristers and Solicitors - Topic 1615

Relationship with client - Conflict of interests - Where lawyer joins opposite party's lawyer's firm - The Supreme Court of Canada stated that the firm was disqualified if the lawyer received confidential information attributable to a solicitor and client relationship relevant to the matter at hand and there was a risk of its use to the client's prejudice - If a previous relationship sufficiently related to the alleged conflicting matter existed, there was a strong rebuttable inference that confidential information was imparted - The additional inference that such information was disclosed to partners or associates could be discharged only with clear and convincing evidence that all reasonable measures were taken to ensure nondisclosure - The court suggested that the lawyers' governing body determine which institutional guarantees could satisfy this requirement.

Barristers and Solicitors - Topic 1615

Relationship with client - Conflict of interests - Where lawyer joins opposite party's lawyer's firm - A lawyer acting as junior counsel for a defendant joined the plaintiff's solicitor's firm - The lawyer possessed confidential information obtained in assisting in the defendant's defence - The issue was whether the plaintiff's solicitor's firm was disqualified from continuing to act in the litigation by reason of a conflict of interest - The Supreme Court of Canada stated that three competing values were to be considered: (1) maintaining the high standards of the legal profession and the integrity of the justice system; (2) the countervailing value that a litigant not be deprived of counsel of his choice without just cause; and (3) the desirability of permitting reasonable mobility in the legal profession - See paragraph 13.

Barristers and Solicitors - Topic 1615

Relationship with client - Conflict of interests - Where lawyer joins opposite party's lawyer's firm - A lawyer acting as junior counsel for a defendant joined the plaintiff's solicitor's firm - The lawyer possessed confidential information from the defendant respecting the action - There was no danger of deliberate or inadvertent disclosure; the lawyer was not acting for the plaintiff and undertook not to disclose the information - The Court of Appeal refused to disqualify the plaintiff's solicitor's firm on the mere appearance of prejudice or impropriety - The Supreme Court of Canada disqualified the firm - The lawyer possessed relevant confidential information and there was insufficient evidence that all reasonable measures were taken to rebut the strong inference of disclosure.

Barristers and Solicitors - Topic 1618

Relationship with client - Conflict of interests - Remedies - Disqualification - The Supreme Court of Canada stated that "the courts, which have inherent jurisdiction to remove from the record solicitors who have a conflict of interest, are not bound to apply a code of ethics. Their jurisdiction stems from the fact that lawyers are officers of the court and their conduct in legal proceedings which may affect the administration of justice is subject to this supervisory jurisdiction. Nonetheless, an expression of a professional standard in a code of ethics relating to a matter before the court could be considered an important statement of public policy" - See paragraph 18.

Cases Noticed:

Morton v. Asper (1987), 49 Man.R.(2d) 167 (Q.B.), affd. (1987), 51 Man.R.(2d) 207 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 6].

Rakusen v. Ellis, Munday & Clarke, [1912] 1 Ch. D. 831, not folld. [para. 9].

Law Society of Manitoba v. Giesbrecht (1983), 24 Man.R.(2d) 228 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 18].

Re a Solicitor (1981), 131 Sol. J. 1063, refd to. [para. 21].

T.C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures Inc. (1953), 113 F. Supp. 265 (S.D.N.Y.), refd to. [para. 22].

Emle Industries Inc. v. Patentex Inc. (1973), 478 F.2d. 562 (2d Cir.), refd to. [para. 22].

E.F. Hutton & Co. Inc. v. Brown (1969), 365 F. Supp. 371, refd to. [para. 22].

Nemours Foundation v. Gilbane, Aetna, Federal Ins. Co. (1986), 632 F. Supp. 418 (D. Delaware), refd to. [para. 22].

U.S.A. for the Use and Benefit of Lord Electric Co. v. Titan Pacific Construction Corp. (1986), 637 F. Supp. 1556 (W.D. Washington), refd to. [para. 22].

In Re Asbestos Cases (1981), 514 F. Supp. 914 (E.D. Virginia), refd to. [para. 22].

Analytica Inc. v. NPD Research Inc. (1983), 708 F.2d. 1263 (7th Cir.), refd to. [para. 23].

Novo Terapeutisk Laboratorium AIS v. Baxter Travenol Laboratories Inc. (1955), 607 F.2d. 186 (7th Cir.), refd to. [para. 25].

Akerly v. Red Barn System Inc. (1977), 551 F.2d. 539 (3th Cir.), refd to. [para. 25].

Gas-A-Tron of Arizona v. Union Oil Co. of California, 534 F.2d. 1322 (9th Cir.), certiorari denied (1976), 429 U.S. 861, refd to. [para. 25].

Silver Chrysler Plymouth Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp. (1975), 518 F.2d. 751 (2d Cir.), refd to. [para. 25].

Laskey Bros. of W. Va. Inc. v. Warner Bros. Pictures (1955), 224 F.2d. 824 (2d Cir.), certiorari denied (1956), 350 U.S. 932, refd to. [para. 25].

City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. (1977), 440 F. Supp. 193 (N.D. Ohio), affd. mem. 573 F.2d. 1310 (6th Cir.), certiorari denied (1977), 435 U.S. 996, refd to. [para. 25].

Fleischer v. A.A.P. Inc. (1958), 163 F. Supp. 548 (S.D.N.Y.), refd to. [para. 25].

D & J Constructions Pty. Ltd. v. Head (1987), 9 N.S.W.L.R. 118, refd to. [para. 27].

National Mutual Holdings Pty. Ltd. v. Sentry Corp. (1989), 87 A.L.R. 539, refd to. [para. 27].

In the Marriage of Thevanaz (1986), 11 Fam.L.R. 95, refd to. [para. 28].

Re the Marriage of R.P. and A.A. Gagliano (1989), 12 Fam.L.R. 843, refd to. [para. 28].

Steed & Evans Ltd. v. MacTavish (1976), 12 O.R.(2d) 236, refd to. [para. 31].

Canada Southern Railway Co. v. Kingsmill, Jennings (1978), 8 C.P.C. 117, refd to. [para. 32].

Falls v. Falls (1979), 12 C.P.C. 270, refd to. [para. 33].

Goldberg v. Goldberg (1982), 141 D.L.R.(3d) 133, refd to. [para. 34].

Lukic v. Urquhart (1984), 11 D.L.R.(4th) 638 (Ont. H.C.), affd. in part (1985), 15 D.L.R.(4th) 639 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 35].

O'Dea v. O'Dea (1987), 68 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 67; 209 A.P.R. 67 (Nfld. Unif. Fam. Ct.), refd to. [para. 36].

Fisher v. Fisher (1986), 76 N.S.R.(2d) 326; 189 A.P.R. 326 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 37].

Thomson v. Smith Mechanical Inc., [1985] C.S. 782, refd to. [para. 38].

Canada v. Consortium Designers Inc. (1988), 72 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 255; 223 A.P.R. 255 (P.E.I.S.C.T.D.), affd. (1989), 80 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 12; 249 A.P.R. 12 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 39].

Farmers Mutual Petroleums Ltd. v. United States Smelting, Refining & Mining Co. (1961), 28 D.L.R.(2d) 618 (Sask. C.A.), refd to. [para. 41].

R. v. Burkinshaw (1967), 60 D.L.R.(2d) 748 (Alta. S.C.), refd to. [para. 41].

Devco Properties Ltd. v. Sunderland, [1977] 2 W.W.R. 664 (Alta. S.C.), refd to. [para. 41].

Mercator Enterprises Ltd. v. Mainland Investments Ltd. (1978), 29 N.S.R.(2d) 703; 45 A.P.R. 703 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 41].

Christo v. Bevan (1982), 36 O.R.(2d) 797 (H.C.), refd to. [para. 41].

Schmeichel v. Saskatchewan Mining Development Corp., [1983] 5 W.W.R. 151; 31 Sask.R. 79 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 41].

Davey v. Woolley, Hames, Dale & Dingwall (1982), 35 O.R.(2d) 599 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 43].

United States Surgical Corp. v. Downs Surgical Canada Ltd. (1982), 141 D.L.R.(3d) 157 (F.C.T.D.), refd to. [para. 43].

Authors and Works Noticed:

Canadian Bar Association, Code of Professional Conduct (1974), ch. 5, commentaries 11, 12 [para. 17].

Dean, M.R., and C.F. Finlayson, Conflicts of Interest: When May A Lawyer Act Against A Former Client?, [1990] N.Z.L.J. 43, p. 52 [para. 29].

Finn, Conflicts of Interest and Professionals, in Professional Responsibility (New Zealand), generally [para. 27].

Kryworuk, P.W., Acting Against Former Clients - A Matter of Dollars and Common Sense, 45 C.P.C. 1, generally [para. 22].

Kryworuk, P.W., Developments in the Law - Conflict of Interest in the Legal Profession (1981), 94 Harv.L.R. 1247, pp. 1315-1334 [para. 22]; 1355-1359 [para. 24].

Steele, Graham, Imputing Knowledge From One Member of a Firm to Another: "Lead Us Not Into Temptation" (1990), 12 Adv. Q. 46, p. 58 [para. 43].

Counsel:

R.A. Dewar and R.A. Watchman, for the appellant;

A.D. MacInnes, Q.C., for the respondent.

Solicitors of Record:

Pitblado & Hoskin, Winnipeg, Manitoba, for the appellant;

Thompson, Dorfman, Sweatman, Winnipeg, Manitoba, for the respondent.

This appeal was heard on May 4, 1990, before Dickson, C.J.C., Wilson, La Forest, L'Heureux-Dubé, Sopinka, Gonthier and Cory, JJ., of the Supreme Court of Canada.

On December 20, 1990, the judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada was delivered in both official languages and the following opinions were filed:

Sopinka, J. (Dickson, C.J.C., La Forest and Gonthier, JJ., concurring)  - see paragraphs 1 to 54;

Cory, J. (Wilson and L'Heureux-Dubé, JJ., concurring) - see paragraphs 55 to 75.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1177 practice notes
  • Ruffo v. Conseil de la magistrature, [1995] 4 SCR 267
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 14 Diciembre 1995
    ...[1992] 2 S.C.R. 606; Ontario v. Canadian Pacific Ltd., [1995] 2 S.C.R. 1031. By Sopinka J. (dissenting) MacDonald Estate v. Martin, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1235; Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy Board, [1978] 1 S.C.R. Statutes and Regulations Cited An Act to amend the Courts of ......
  • Lavallee, Rackel and Heintz et al. v. Canada (Attorney General), (1998) 218 A.R. 229 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 5 Junio 1998
    ...3 S.C.R. 199 ; 187 N.R. 1 ; 127 D.L.R.(4th) 1 , refd to. [para. 13]. MacDonald Estate v. Martin and Rossmere Holdings (1970) Ltd., [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1235; 121 N.R. 1 ; 70 Man.R.(2d) 241 ; 77 D.L.R.(4th) 249 ; [1991] 1 W.W.R. 705 , refd to. [para. 13]. Gray, Administrator of MacDonald Es......
  • Malton v. Attia,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 6 Mayo 2013
    ... 35 R.P.R.(2d) 141 (Ont. Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 199, footnote 85]. MacDonald Estate v. Martin and Rossmere Holdings (1970) Ltd., [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1235; 121 N.R. 1 ; 70 Man.R.(2d) 241 ; 77 D.L.R.(4th) 249 , refd to. [para. 202, footnote 90]. Hodgkinson v. Simms et al., [1994] 3 S.C.......
  • 3464920 Canada Inc. v. Strother et al., (2007) 241 B.C.A.C. 108 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 1 Junio 2007
    ...management and minimization'" - See paragraphs 98 to 108. Cases Noticed: MacDonald Estate v. Martin and Rossmere Holdings (1970) Ltd., [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1235; 121 N.R. 1 ; 70 Man.R.(2d) 241 , refd to. [para. R. v. Neil (D.L.), [2002] 3 S.C.R. 631 ; 294 N.R. 201 ; 317 A.R. 73 ; 284 W.A.C......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1064 cases
  • Ruffo v. Conseil de la magistrature, [1995] 4 SCR 267
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 14 Diciembre 1995
    ...[1992] 2 S.C.R. 606; Ontario v. Canadian Pacific Ltd., [1995] 2 S.C.R. 1031. By Sopinka J. (dissenting) MacDonald Estate v. Martin, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1235; Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy Board, [1978] 1 S.C.R. Statutes and Regulations Cited An Act to amend the Courts of ......
  • Lavallee, Rackel and Heintz et al. v. Canada (Attorney General), (1998) 218 A.R. 229 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 5 Junio 1998
    ...3 S.C.R. 199 ; 187 N.R. 1 ; 127 D.L.R.(4th) 1 , refd to. [para. 13]. MacDonald Estate v. Martin and Rossmere Holdings (1970) Ltd., [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1235; 121 N.R. 1 ; 70 Man.R.(2d) 241 ; 77 D.L.R.(4th) 249 ; [1991] 1 W.W.R. 705 , refd to. [para. 13]. Gray, Administrator of MacDonald Es......
  • Malton v. Attia,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 6 Mayo 2013
    ... 35 R.P.R.(2d) 141 (Ont. Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 199, footnote 85]. MacDonald Estate v. Martin and Rossmere Holdings (1970) Ltd., [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1235; 121 N.R. 1 ; 70 Man.R.(2d) 241 ; 77 D.L.R.(4th) 249 , refd to. [para. 202, footnote 90]. Hodgkinson v. Simms et al., [1994] 3 S.C.......
  • Ruffo (Juge) v. Conseil de la magistrature et autres, (1995) 190 N.R. 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 23 Marzo 1995
    ...[1995] 2 S.C.R. 1031; 183 N.R. 325; 82 O.A.C. 243, refd to. [para. 105]. MacDonald Estate v. Martin and Rossmere Holdings (1970) Ltd., [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1235; 121 N.R. 1; 70 Man.R.(2d) 241; [1991] 1 W.W.R. 705, refd to. [para. 115]. Gray, Administrator of MacDonald Estate - see MacDonald Esta......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 23 ' 27, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 31 Enero 2023
    ...Presumed Prejudice, Rebuttable Presumption, Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp., 2006 SCC 36, MacDonald Estate v. Martin, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1235, Etco Financial Corp. v. Ontario, [1999] O.J. No 3658 (S.C.), R. v. Babos, 2014 SCC 16, Law Society of Saskatchewan v. Abrametz, 2022 SC......
  • Professional Ethics In A Tax World – Self-Assessment, Self-Incrimination, The Charter, Crown Fairness And Other Matters
    • Canada
    • JD Supra Canada
    • 7 Octubre 2011
    ...the court has authority to exercise some control over counsel when necessary to protect its process. In MacDonald Estate v. Martin, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1235, this Court confirmed that inherent jurisdiction includes the authority to remove counsel from a case when required to ensure a fair trial......
  • Top 5 Civil Appeals From The Court Of Appeal (December 2014)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 29 Diciembre 2014
    ...erred in quashing the OLRB decisions. They claimed that the lower court incorrectly applied the test in MacDonald Estate v. Martin, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1235, relating to a lawyer's potential conflict of interest, arguing that the correct test to be applied to an adjudicator for reasonable appre......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 24 – 28, 2014)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 8 Diciembre 2014
    ...the position that in disqualifying the Vice-Chair, the Divisional Court incorrectly applied the test in MacDonald Estate v. Martin, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1235 relating to conflict of interest of a lawyer and therefore incorrectly quashed the OLRB decision. They argued that the correct test to be ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
103 books & journal articles
  • Conflict of Interest
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Ethics and Criminal Law. Second Edition
    • 19 Junio 2015
    ...5: public confidence in the justice system depends on lawyers’ respecting the duty of loyalty. See also MacDonald Estate v Martin , [1990] 3 SCR 1235 at 1244 [paras 13, 15, and 18] [ MacDonald Estate ]; Neil , above note 1 at para 24; Strother , above note 1 at para 34; McKercher , above no......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Fundamental Justice: Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Second Edition
    • 22 Junio 2019
    ...33 M’Naghten’s Case (1843), 8 ER 718, [1843–60] All ER 229 (HL) .......................247 MacDonald Estate v Martin, [1990] 3 SCR 1235, 77 DLR (4th) 249, [1990] SCJ No 41 ........................................................... 283 MacKay v The Queen, [1980] 2 SCR 370 ........................
  • Private international law implications in conflicts of interest for lawyers licensed in multiple countries.
    • Canada
    • McGill Law Journal Vol. 60 No. 3, March - March 2015
    • 1 Marzo 2015
    ...at 4; Woolley, supra note 1 at 5, 6, 12, 14. See generally the following Supreme Court of Canada cases: MacDonald Estate v Martin, [1990] 3 SCR 1235, 77 DLR (4th) 249 [MacDonald Estate cited to SCR]; R v Neil, 2002 SCC 70, [2002] 3 SCR 631 [Neil1 (originating in Alberta); Strother v 3464920......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Ethics and Criminal Law. Second Edition
    • 19 Junio 2015
    ...238, [1993] OJ No 1115 (Gen Div) .......................................................................187 MacDonald Estate v Martin, [1990] 3 SCR 1235, 77 DLR (4th) 249, 1990 CanLII 32 .................................................. 6, 164, 165, 240, 264, 266, 267, 270, 274, 286, 288−9......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT