MacDonald v. Mitchell and Barry, (1969) 2 N.B.R.(2d) 165 (CA)
Judge | Bridges, C.J.N.B., Limerick and Hughes, JJ.A. |
Court | Court of Appeal (New Brunswick) |
Case Date | April 18, 1969 |
Jurisdiction | New Brunswick |
Citations | (1969), 2 N.B.R.(2d) 165 (CA) |
MacDonald v. Mitchell (1969), 2 N.B.R.(2d) 165 (CA);
2 R.N.-B.(2e) 165
MLB headnote and full text
Sommaire et texte intégral
MacDonald v. Mitchell and Barry
Indexed As: MacDonald v. Mitchell and Barry
Répertorié: MacDonald v. Mitchell and Barry
New Brunswick Court of Appeal
Bridges, C.J.N.B., Limerick and Hughes, JJ.A.
December 17, 1969.
Summary:
Résumé:
The New Brunswick Court of Appeal affirmed judgment of trial Judge who held the driver of a motor vehicle responsible for plaintiff's damages for personal injuries where the driver started a motor vehicle when the driver with an artificial right hand had been drinking intoxicating liquors.
The New Brunswick Court of Appeal reversed trial Judge's finding that the owner was liable in circumstances where the owner left the key in the ignition of his motor vehicle and knew that a person was sitting in the driver's seat of such vehicle.
The New Brunswick Court of Appeal held that the owner was not liable pursuant to section 241 of the Motor Vehicle Act which requires possession of a motor vehicle of driver with the owner's consent.
The New Brunswick Court of Appeal held that the owner did not consent to the driver taking possession of the motor vehicle where the owner left the key in the ignition and knew that the driver was alone in the vehicle.
Torts - Topic 309
Negligence - Motor vehicle, liability of owner for negligence of driver of owner's vehicle - Meaning of "consent" or "gives or furnishes" - Statutory liability of owner - Whether a person is in possession of a motor vehicle with the consent of the owner where the owner left the person alone in the motor vehicle which had the key in the ignition (New Brunswick Court of Appeal).
Torts - Topic 7377
Joint and concurrent tortfeasors - Contribution between tortfeasors - Claim for, general - Negligence - Practice - Claim for contribution or indemnity between joint or concurrent tortfeasors - Tortfeasors Act - Circumstances under which court must determine degrees of fault pursuant to section 2(1) of the Contributory Negligence Act (New Brunswick Court of Appeal).
Practice - Topic 2121
Pleadings - Amendment of pleadings - Statement of claim, adding particulars or subsequent facts - Evidence of negligence of defendant adduced which was not alleged in statement of claim - Circumstances under which court should grant application for amendment of statement of claim (New Brunswick Court of Appeal).
Damage Awards - Topic 147
Injury and death - Leg injuries - Crush type injury - Crushing injury to muscles - 46 year old male - Impairment of earning capacity - $15,000 general damages for personal injuries (New Brunswick Court of Appeal).
Cases Noticed:
Pike v. Denine (1955), 38 M.P.R. 6, folld.
Marsh v. Kulchar, [1952] 1 S.C.R. 330, folld.
Steward v. North Metropolitan Tramways Company (1886), 16 Q.B.D. 556, folld.
Marleau v. People's Gas Supply Company Limited, [1940] S.C.R. 708, folld.
Hallett v. Fredericton Propane Gas Company Limited (1953), 32 M.P.R. 130, folld.
Walton v. Nearing et al. (1960), 44 M.P.R. 322, folld.
Nance v. British Columbia Electric Railway Company Ltd., [1951] A.C. 601, folld.
Lang v. Pollard, [1957] S.C.R. 858, folld.
Statutes Noticed:
Motor Vehicle Act, S.N.B. 1955, c. 13, sect. 241.
Rules of Court, Order 28, rule 1, rule 6, rule 12.
Contributory Negligence Act, S.N.B. 1961-62, c. 16, sect. 2(1).
Tortfeasors Act, R.S.N.B. 1952, c. 232.
Counsel:
E. Neil McKelvey, Q.C., and L.E. Clain, for the appellant, Mitchell;
Murray F. Cain, for respondent, MacDonald;
J.D. Harper, for respondent Barry.
Appeal from a judgment of Prescott, J., dated April 18, 1969, [(1969) 1 N.B.R.(2d) 563], in favour of the plaintiff in an action for damages for personal injury arising out of a motor vehicle accident.
Bridges, C.J.N.B., concurs with Hughes, J.A.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cyr v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Edmundston, (1982) 39 N.B.R.(2d) 361 (CA)
...[para. 13]. Nance v. British Columbia Electric R. Co., [1951] 3 D.L.R. 705, consd. [para. 15]. MacDonald v. Mitchell & Barry (1970), 2 N.B.R.(2d) 165, consd. [para. Hood v. Hood, [1972] S.C.R. 244, consd. [para. 15]. Guy v. Trizec Equities Ltd. (1978), 26 N.S.R.(2d) 1; 40 A.P.R. 1; 85 D......
-
Amos v. Purdy, (1976) 16 N.B.R.(2d) 186 (CA)
...Noticed: Nance v. British Columbia Electric Railway Company, [1951] A.C. 601, folld. [para. 6]. MacDonald v. Mitchell and Barry (1970), 2 N.B.R.(2d) 165 (C.A.), folld. [para. 6]. Counsel: John D. Harper, for the defendant, appellant; William L. Hoyt, Q.C., for the plaintiff, respondent. Thi......
-
Moore v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., (1982) 42 N.B.R.(2d) 667 (CA)
...[para. 10]. Marleau v. Peoples Gas Supply Company Limited (1940), 40 S.C.R. 708, appld. [para. 10]. MacDonald v. Mitchell and Barry (1969), 2 N.B.R.(2d) 165, appld. [para. Statutes Noticed: Rules of Court (N.B.), O. 28, rule 1, rule 6, rule 12 [para. 10]. Counsel: John S. MacPhee, for the a......
-
Patterson v. MacKenzie, (1972) 5 N.B.R.(2d) 176 (CA)
...Ferrar, [1955] S.C.R. 757, folld. London Passenger Transport Board v. Upson, [1949] A.C. 155, folld. MacDonald v. Mitchell and Barry (1970), 2 N.B.R.(2d) 165, Davies v. Mann (1842), 10 M. & W. 546, not folld. Davies v. Swan Motor Co. (Swansea) Ltd., [1949] 1 All E.R. 620, folld. Hartlen......
-
Cyr v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Edmundston, (1982) 39 N.B.R.(2d) 361 (CA)
...[para. 13]. Nance v. British Columbia Electric R. Co., [1951] 3 D.L.R. 705, consd. [para. 15]. MacDonald v. Mitchell & Barry (1970), 2 N.B.R.(2d) 165, consd. [para. Hood v. Hood, [1972] S.C.R. 244, consd. [para. 15]. Guy v. Trizec Equities Ltd. (1978), 26 N.S.R.(2d) 1; 40 A.P.R. 1; 85 D......
-
Amos v. Purdy, (1976) 16 N.B.R.(2d) 186 (CA)
...Noticed: Nance v. British Columbia Electric Railway Company, [1951] A.C. 601, folld. [para. 6]. MacDonald v. Mitchell and Barry (1970), 2 N.B.R.(2d) 165 (C.A.), folld. [para. 6]. Counsel: John D. Harper, for the defendant, appellant; William L. Hoyt, Q.C., for the plaintiff, respondent. Thi......
-
Moore v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., (1982) 42 N.B.R.(2d) 667 (CA)
...[para. 10]. Marleau v. Peoples Gas Supply Company Limited (1940), 40 S.C.R. 708, appld. [para. 10]. MacDonald v. Mitchell and Barry (1969), 2 N.B.R.(2d) 165, appld. [para. Statutes Noticed: Rules of Court (N.B.), O. 28, rule 1, rule 6, rule 12 [para. 10]. Counsel: John S. MacPhee, for the a......
-
Patterson v. MacKenzie, (1972) 5 N.B.R.(2d) 176 (CA)
...Ferrar, [1955] S.C.R. 757, folld. London Passenger Transport Board v. Upson, [1949] A.C. 155, folld. MacDonald v. Mitchell and Barry (1970), 2 N.B.R.(2d) 165, Davies v. Mann (1842), 10 M. & W. 546, not folld. Davies v. Swan Motor Co. (Swansea) Ltd., [1949] 1 All E.R. 620, folld. Hartlen......