MacEachern v. Rennie et al.
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | Ehrcke, J. |
| Citation | [2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 585,[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 585 (SC),2009 BCSC 585 |
| Date | 17 April 2009 |
| Subject Matter | TORTS,PRACTICE,EVIDENCE |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
Crawford v. Nazif
...is rather a consideration in determining whether the proposed evidence is truly necessary and relevant”: MacEachern v. Rennie, 2009 BCSC 585 at para. 8; Dinnissen v. Lee, 2018 BCSC 2233 at para. 6; and Level One Construction Ltd. v. Burnham, 2017 BCSC 2470 at [41] 
......
-
Furlong v. Sexton Trucking Limited
...Cited:   CASES CONSIDERED: Tucker (Public Trustee of) v. Asleson (1993), 24 B.C.A.C. 253; MacEachern (Committee of) v. Rennie, 2009 BCSC 585; Millott Estate v. Reinhard, 2002 ABQB 761; Fuller v. Schaff, 2009 YKSC 10; Ryall v. Coombs (1995), 131 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 299, 408 A.P.R. 299 ......
-
TA Hotel Management Ltd Partnership (Re)
...of fact is not impartial, and therefore not qualified. Whether that results in exclusion is a matter of degree. In MacEachern v. Rennie, 2009 BCSC 585 at para. 8, Justice Ehrcke explained that opinions that touch on the ultimate issue are admissible unless they are presented in a manner tha......
-
Uy v. Dhillon
...plaintiff Uy says that the entirety of this report does not meet the necessity requirement. He acknowledges that in MacEachern v. Rennie, 2009 BCSC 585, Mr. Justice Ehrcke concluded that expert evidence on the standard of care of a commercial truck driver may meet the necessity test, b......
4 cases
-
Crawford v. Nazif
...is rather a consideration in determining whether the proposed evidence is truly necessary and relevant”: MacEachern v. Rennie, 2009 BCSC 585 at para. 8; Dinnissen v. Lee, 2018 BCSC 2233 at para. 6; and Level One Construction Ltd. v. Burnham, 2017 BCSC 2470 at [41] 
......
-
Furlong v. Sexton Trucking Limited
...Cited:   CASES CONSIDERED: Tucker (Public Trustee of) v. Asleson (1993), 24 B.C.A.C. 253; MacEachern (Committee of) v. Rennie, 2009 BCSC 585; Millott Estate v. Reinhard, 2002 ABQB 761; Fuller v. Schaff, 2009 YKSC 10; Ryall v. Coombs (1995), 131 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 299, 408 A.P.R. 299 ......
-
TA Hotel Management Ltd Partnership (Re)
...of fact is not impartial, and therefore not qualified. Whether that results in exclusion is a matter of degree. In MacEachern v. Rennie, 2009 BCSC 585 at para. 8, Justice Ehrcke explained that opinions that touch on the ultimate issue are admissible unless they are presented in a manner tha......
-
Uy v. Dhillon
...plaintiff Uy says that the entirety of this report does not meet the necessity requirement. He acknowledges that in MacEachern v. Rennie, 2009 BCSC 585, Mr. Justice Ehrcke concluded that expert evidence on the standard of care of a commercial truck driver may meet the necessity test, b......
