Magill v. Expedia Inc. et al.,
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Perell, J. |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Citation | [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 683 (SC),[2013] O.T.C. Uned. 683,2013 ONSC 683 |
| Date | 31 January 2013 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
11 practice notes
-
Hoy v. Expedia Group Inc.
...ONCA 681 ; Vu v. Canada (Attorney General); 2021 ONCA 574 ; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre v. Buttcon Ltd. 2021 ONSC 6061 . [146] 2013 ONSC 683 at para. [147] Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68 at para. 18. [148] Western Canadian Shopping Centres Inc. v. Dutton, 2001 SCC 46 at ......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 1 ' 5, 2025)
...752, Sankar v. Bell Mobility, 2013 ONSC 5916, Graham v. Imperial Parking Canada Corporation, 2010 ONSC 4982, Magill v. Expedia, Inc., 2013 ONSC 683, Smith v. Inco Ltd., 2011 ONCA 628, Stenzler v. TD Asset Management Inc., 2020 ONSC 111, Sun-Rype Products Ltd. v. Archer Daniels Midland Compa......
-
2025 ONCA 831
...74 B.L.R. (4th) 172, at paras. 165–167, leave to appeal refused, 2011 ONSC 991 (Div. Ct.), 279 O.A.C. 342; and Magill v. Expedia, Inc., 2013 ONSC 683, 36 C.P.C. (7th) 74, at para. 97 I am not persuaded by this argument. In assessing whether the class definition is appropriate, the issue is ......
-
Robson v Federal Express Canada Corporation
...74 B.L.R. (4th) 172, at paras. 165–167, leave to appeal refused, 2011 ONSC 991 (Div. Ct.), 279 O.A.C. 342; and Magill v. Expedia, Inc., 2013 ONSC 683, 36 C.P.C. (7th) 74, at para. 97 I am not persuaded by this argument. In assessing whether the class definition is appropriate, the issue is ......
Get Started for Free
8 cases
-
Hoy v. Expedia Group Inc.
...ONCA 681 ; Vu v. Canada (Attorney General); 2021 ONCA 574 ; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre v. Buttcon Ltd. 2021 ONSC 6061 . [146] 2013 ONSC 683 at para. [147] Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68 at para. 18. [148] Western Canadian Shopping Centres Inc. v. Dutton, 2001 SCC 46 at ......
-
Robson v Federal Express Canada Corporation
...74 B.L.R. (4th) 172, at paras. 165–167, leave to appeal refused, 2011 ONSC 991 (Div. Ct.), 279 O.A.C. 342; and Magill v. Expedia, Inc., 2013 ONSC 683, 36 C.P.C. (7th) 74, at para. 97 I am not persuaded by this argument. In assessing whether the class definition is appropriate, the issue is ......
-
Marshall et al. v. United Furniture Warehouse Limited Partnership et al.
...wrong that is alleged ( Martin v Astrazeneca (2012 ONSC 2744) at para. 95) and in respect of each defendant ( Magill v Expedia Inc , 2013 ONSC 683 at paras. 73-76). See also Stanway v Wyeth Canada Inc, 2012 BCCA 260 at para. 11. [140] The common issues should not be framed in overly broad t......
-
Felker v. Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R
...of class members with claims against that party, citing Williamson at paras. 227–232; Marshall para. 139; Magill v. Expedia Inc., 2013 ONSC 683 at paras. [126]    Section 4(1)(b) of the CPA requires that there be an identifiable class of two or more persons. The class ......
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 1 ' 5, 2025)
...752, Sankar v. Bell Mobility, 2013 ONSC 5916, Graham v. Imperial Parking Canada Corporation, 2010 ONSC 4982, Magill v. Expedia, Inc., 2013 ONSC 683, Smith v. Inco Ltd., 2011 ONCA 628, Stenzler v. TD Asset Management Inc., 2020 ONSC 111, Sun-Rype Products Ltd. v. Archer Daniels Midland Compa......
-
Magill v. Expedia, Inc. Summary Judgment: The New Response To Certification?
...allowed to profit from the service fee. Perell J. certified a class action against Expedia Inc., but not against its Canadian subsidiary: 2013 ONSC 683. Expedia then sought summary On the motion for summary judgment, Perell J. had before him a record of the disclosure made by Expedia in res......