Magonza v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2019 FC 14 |
| Date | 07 January 2019 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
145 practice notes
-
Yilmaz v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...intervene only where the evidence is overwhelmingly against the decision maker’s finding: Magonza v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 14 at paragraph [24] Administrative decision makers must give reasons for their findings of fact. This requirement is heightened where the decisi......
-
Onuchukwu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...permit, citing Opakunbi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 943 at para 12, Magonza v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 14 at para 35, Omijie paras 12-13, and Adu v. (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 565 at paras 14 and 20. The Applicant further su......
-
Yilmaz v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...intervene only where the evidence is overwhelmingly against the decision maker’s finding: Magonza v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 14 at paragraph [24] Administrative decision makers must give reasons for their findings of fact. This requirement is heightened where the decisi......
-
Obasi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...16; Sallai v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 446 [Sallai] at paras 57-63; Magonza v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 14 at para 35; Ayeni v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1202 at para 28. This requirement protects against “veiled credibility finding......
Get Started for Free
142 cases
-
Yilmaz v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...intervene only where the evidence is overwhelmingly against the decision maker’s finding: Magonza v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 14 at paragraph [24] Administrative decision makers must give reasons for their findings of fact. This requirement is heightened where the decisi......
-
Onuchukwu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...permit, citing Opakunbi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 943 at para 12, Magonza v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 14 at para 35, Omijie paras 12-13, and Adu v. (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 565 at paras 14 and 20. The Applicant further su......
-
Yilmaz v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...intervene only where the evidence is overwhelmingly against the decision maker’s finding: Magonza v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 14 at paragraph [24] Administrative decision makers must give reasons for their findings of fact. This requirement is heightened where the decisi......
-
Canada v. Canada (Ship-Source Oil Pollution Fund)
...22; K (K) v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 78 at para 61). In Magonza v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 14 [Magonza], in the context of discussing the concept of the sufficiency of evidence, Justice Grammond addressed reliance on indirect or circumst......
Get Started for Free
