Mancinelli v. Royal Bank of Canada, 2020 ONSC 1646

JurisdictionOntario
JudgePERELL, J.
Docket NumberCV-15-536174-00CP
Citation2020 ONSC 1646
Date14 April 2020
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
33 practice notes
  • An Overview of Class Actions and Covid-19 in Ontario’s Long-term Care Facilities
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-2, March 2021
    • March 1, 2021
    ...leave to appeal to SCC filed 6 July 2020; Levac v James, 2019 ONSC 5092 at paras 52–53 [Levac]; and Mancinelli v Royal Bank of Canada, 2020 ONSC 1646 at paras 230–32. 31 See, for example, Infineon, above note 3 at para 139; Andriuk v Merrill Lynch Canada Inc, 2013 ABQB 422 at para 133; Demb......
  • The Unworkability of the Workable Methodology Standard
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-2, March 2021
    • March 1, 2021
    ...leave to appeal to SCC filed 6 July 2020; Levac v James, 2019 ONSC 5092 at paras 52–53 [Levac]; and Mancinelli v Royal Bank of Canada, 2020 ONSC 1646 at paras 230–32. 31 See, for example, Infineon, above note 3 at para 139; Andriuk v Merrill Lynch Canada Inc, 2013 ABQB 422 at para 133; Demb......
  • United We Stand, Divided We Fall: Class Actions and Corporate Hegemony
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-2, March 2021
    • March 1, 2021
    ...leave to appeal to SCC filed 6 July 2020; Levac v James, 2019 ONSC 5092 at paras 52–53 [Levac]; and Mancinelli v Royal Bank of Canada, 2020 ONSC 1646 at paras 230–32. 31 See, for example, Infineon, above note 3 at para 139; Andriuk v Merrill Lynch Canada Inc, 2013 ABQB 422 at para 133; Demb......
  • The Limits of Case Management: A Review and Principled Approach to the Court’s General Management Powers
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-2, March 2021
    • March 1, 2021
    ...leave to appeal to SCC filed 6 July 2020; Levac v James, 2019 ONSC 5092 at paras 52–53 [Levac]; and Mancinelli v Royal Bank of Canada, 2020 ONSC 1646 at paras 230–32. 31 See, for example, Infineon, above note 3 at para 139; Andriuk v Merrill Lynch Canada Inc, 2013 ABQB 422 at para 133; Demb......
  • Get Started for Free
20 cases
  • Jensen v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • April 28, 2023
    ...on Crosslink v. BASF Canada, 2014 ONSC 1682 (Div. Ct.), 54 C.P.C. (7th) 111 [Crosslink 1] and on Mancinelli v. Royal Bank of Canada, 2020 ONSC 1646, 320 A.C.W.S. (3d) 547 [Mancinelli], which both involved alleged price-fixing conspiracies. In both cases, the Court cautioned against setting ......
  • WN Pharmaceuticals Ltd v Krishnan,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • February 15, 2023
    ...issue can be answered in common across the class: Simpson v. Facebook, 2021 ONSC 968 at para. 43; Mancinelli v. Royal Bank of Canada, 2020 ONSC 1646 at para. 120; Bhangu v. Honda Canada Inc., 2021 BCSC 794 at paras. 97–99; and Charlton v. Abbott Laboratories Ltd., 2015 BCCA 26, at pa......
  • Krishnan v. Jamieson Laboratories Inc., 2021 BCSC 1396
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 16, 2021
    ...issue can be answered in common across the class: Simpson v. Facebook, 2021 ONSC 968 at para. 43; Mancinelli v. Royal Bank of Canada, 2020 ONSC 1646 at para. 120; Bhangu at para. 97-99; Charlton v. Abbott Laboratories Ltd., 2015 BCCA 26, at para. Scope of Disagreement on the Common Issues [......
  • Jensen v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., 2021 FC 1185
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 5, 2021
    ...an alleged conspiracy in Canada include Watson; Airia Brands v Air Canada, 2015 ONSC 5352 [Airia]; and Mancinelli v Royal Bank of Canada, 2020 ONSC 1646 [Mancinelli]. Examples where there was an underlying criminal investigation and either guilty pleas or admissions had been made by the def......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Ontario Superior Court Narrows Foreign Exchange Class Action
    • Canada
    • JD Supra Canada
    • May 28, 2020
    ...Court's recent decision granting certification in a foreign exchange price-fixing class action (Mancinelli v. Royal Bank of Canada, 2020 ONSC 1646) reminds counsel and stakeholders of: (a) the relatively low threshold for class action certification in Ontario, and (b) the Court’s significan......
  • Ontario Superior Court Narrows Foreign Exchange Class Action
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 2, 2020
    ...Court's recent decision granting certification in a foreign exchange price-fixing class action (Mancinelli v. Royal Bank of Canada, 2020 ONSC 1646) reminds counsel and stakeholders of: (a) the relatively low threshold for class action certification in Ontario, and (b) the Court's significan......
11 books & journal articles
  • Introduction
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-2, March 2021
    • March 1, 2021
    ...leave to appeal to SCC filed 6 July 2020; Levac v James, 2019 ONSC 5092 at paras 52–53 [Levac]; and Mancinelli v Royal Bank of Canada, 2020 ONSC 1646 at paras 230–32. 31 See, for example, Infineon, above note 3 at para 139; Andriuk v Merrill Lynch Canada Inc, 2013 ABQB 422 at para 133; Demb......
  • Book Review: Defending Class Actions in Canada: A Guide for Defendants
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-2, March 2021
    • March 1, 2021
    ...leave to appeal to SCC filed 6 July 2020; Levac v James, 2019 ONSC 5092 at paras 52–53 [Levac]; and Mancinelli v Royal Bank of Canada, 2020 ONSC 1646 at paras 230–32. 31 See, for example, Infineon, above note 3 at para 139; Andriuk v Merrill Lynch Canada Inc, 2013 ABQB 422 at para 133; Demb......
  • Flash Boys Class Actions: Civil Fraud, Conspiracy, and the Certifiability of High-frequency Trading Cases in Canada
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-2, March 2021
    • March 1, 2021
    ...leave to appeal to SCC filed 6 July 2020; Levac v James, 2019 ONSC 5092 at paras 52–53 [Levac]; and Mancinelli v Royal Bank of Canada, 2020 ONSC 1646 at paras 230–32. 31 See, for example, Infineon, above note 3 at para 139; Andriuk v Merrill Lynch Canada Inc, 2013 ABQB 422 at para 133; Demb......
  • An Overview of Class Actions and Covid-19 in Ontario’s Long-term Care Facilities
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-2, March 2021
    • March 1, 2021
    ...leave to appeal to SCC filed 6 July 2020; Levac v James, 2019 ONSC 5092 at paras 52–53 [Levac]; and Mancinelli v Royal Bank of Canada, 2020 ONSC 1646 at paras 230–32. 31 See, for example, Infineon, above note 3 at para 139; Andriuk v Merrill Lynch Canada Inc, 2013 ABQB 422 at para 133; Demb......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT