Mann v Mitchel, 2019 MBCA 44
| Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
| Judge | MONNIN |
| Citation | 2019 MBCA 44 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Manitoba) |
| Docket Number | AF18-30-09088 |
| Date | 23 April 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Penner v Montcalm (Rural Municipality), 2020 MBCA 97
...Penner has demonstrated that he has an arguable ground of appeal. That criterion was explained this way by Monnin JA in Mann v Mitchell, 2019 MBCA 44 (at para 3): “an arguable ground is one which survives a preliminary examination under the applicable standard of review and has the potentia......
-
Bartel-Zobarich v Manitoba Association of Health Care Professionals (MAHCP-Bargaining Unit) et al,
...In Mann v Mitchell, 2019 MBCA 44 (relying on Sattva Capital Corp v Creston Moly Corp, 2014 SCC 53; and Boryskiewich v Stuart, 2014 MBCA 77), Monnin JA stated that an arguable ground of appeal is “one which survives a preliminary examination under the applicable standard of review and......
2 cases
-
Penner v Montcalm (Rural Municipality), 2020 MBCA 97
...Penner has demonstrated that he has an arguable ground of appeal. That criterion was explained this way by Monnin JA in Mann v Mitchell, 2019 MBCA 44 (at para 3): “an arguable ground is one which survives a preliminary examination under the applicable standard of review and has the potentia......
-
Bartel-Zobarich v Manitoba Association of Health Care Professionals (MAHCP-Bargaining Unit) et al,
...In Mann v Mitchell, 2019 MBCA 44 (relying on Sattva Capital Corp v Creston Moly Corp, 2014 SCC 53; and Boryskiewich v Stuart, 2014 MBCA 77), Monnin JA stated that an arguable ground of appeal is “one which survives a preliminary examination under the applicable standard of review and......