Manos v. Riotrin Properties (Flamborough) Inc.

JurisdictionOntario
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
JudgeRouleau, Hourigan and Roberts JJ.A.
Citation2020 ONCA 211
Docket NumberC66520
Date16 March 2020

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
6 practice notes
  • D.M. v. The Children__s Aid Society of Ottawa
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 20, 2021
    ...1 O.R. 189 at p. 199 (C.A.). [67] R. v. M. (R.E.), [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3 at para. 41. [68] Bruno v. Dacosta 2020 ONCA 602; Manos v. Riotrin, 2020 ONCA 211; National Gallery of Canada v. Lafleur de la Capitale Inc., 2017 ONCA 688; XE "para:N14067:MsoFootnoteText" R. v. Sheppard, [2002]......
  • Canada v. Greenwood
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • September 21, 2021
    ...to permit meaningful appellate review, as the Ontario Court of Appeal recently noted in Manos v. Riotrin Properties (Flamborough) Inc., 2020 ONCA 211, 2020 CarswellOnt 3794, at para. 11. [102] In the present case, where the Federal Court was not called upon to weigh competing evidence or to......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 16 – March 20, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • April 1, 2020
    ...Appeals, Extension of Time, Security for Costs, Consolidation, Representation by Lawyer Manos v. Riotrin Properties (Flamborough) Inc., 2020 ONCA 211 Keywords: Torts, Negligence, Causation, Damages, Non-Pecuniary Loss, Civil Procedure, Experts, Dovbush v. Mouzitchka, 2016 ONCA 381 Montrose ......
  • A.L. Sims and Son Ltd. v. British Columbia (Transportation and Infrastructure)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • December 28, 2022
    ...on no or inadmissible evidence. [108] In support of this submission, A.L. Sims relies on Manos v. Riotrin Properties (Flamborough) Inc., 2020 ONCA 211 and Aubrey v. Teck Highland Valley Copper Partnership, 2017 BCCA 144 for the proposition that the arbitrator’s reasons must show why expert ......
  • Get Started for Free
4 cases
  • D.M. v. The Children__s Aid Society of Ottawa
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 20, 2021
    ...1 O.R. 189 at p. 199 (C.A.). [67] R. v. M. (R.E.), [2008] 3 S.C.R. 3 at para. 41. [68] Bruno v. Dacosta 2020 ONCA 602; Manos v. Riotrin, 2020 ONCA 211; National Gallery of Canada v. Lafleur de la Capitale Inc., 2017 ONCA 688; XE "para:N14067:MsoFootnoteText" R. v. Sheppard, [2002]......
  • Canada v. Greenwood
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • September 21, 2021
    ...to permit meaningful appellate review, as the Ontario Court of Appeal recently noted in Manos v. Riotrin Properties (Flamborough) Inc., 2020 ONCA 211, 2020 CarswellOnt 3794, at para. 11. [102] In the present case, where the Federal Court was not called upon to weigh competing evidence or to......
  • A.L. Sims and Son Ltd. v. British Columbia (Transportation and Infrastructure)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • December 28, 2022
    ...on no or inadmissible evidence. [108] In support of this submission, A.L. Sims relies on Manos v. Riotrin Properties (Flamborough) Inc., 2020 ONCA 211 and Aubrey v. Teck Highland Valley Copper Partnership, 2017 BCCA 144 for the proposition that the arbitrator’s reasons must show why expert ......
  • 1995636 Ontario v. 5010729 Ontario
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 15, 2026
    ...the underlying reasons for decision permit meaningful and effective appellate review: Manos v. Riotrin Properties (Flamborough) Inc., 2020 ONCA 211, at para. 11, leave to appeal denied [2020] S.C.C.A. No. 133. [74]            First, the......
2 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 16 – March 20, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • April 1, 2020
    ...Appeals, Extension of Time, Security for Costs, Consolidation, Representation by Lawyer Manos v. Riotrin Properties (Flamborough) Inc., 2020 ONCA 211 Keywords: Torts, Negligence, Causation, Damages, Non-Pecuniary Loss, Civil Procedure, Experts, Dovbush v. Mouzitchka, 2016 ONCA 381 Montrose ......
  • The Most Important Cases For Personal Injury Lawyers
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 5, 2021
    ...Bongiardina. 22. 2021 ONCA 197 23. Casterton v MacIsaac, 2020 ONSC 190 24. 2020 ONCA 155 25. R.S.O. 1990, c. O.2 26. 2021 ONSC 2029 27. 2020 ONCA 211 28. 2020 BCCA 133 29. Provost v Dueck Downtown Chevrolet Buick GMS Limited, 2020 BCCA 86. I will not be discussing the appeal brought by the ......