Margolin v. The Queen, 2018 TCC 36
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Citation | 2018 TCC 36 |
Court | Tax Court (Canada) |
Date | 21 February 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Sindhi v. The King, 2023 TCC 102
...The Queen, 2016 TCC 13, a decision of Justice Smith; Kniazev v The Queen, 2019 TCC 58, a decision of Justice Smith; Margolin v The Queen, 2018 TCC 36, a decision of Deputy Judge Masse; Virani v The Queen, 2010 TCC 113, a decision of Justice Campbell; Berkovich v The Queen, 2014 TCC 268, a d......
-
Sozio v. The Queen, 2018 TCC 258
...intention to occupy has been frustrated. the requirements of subsection 254(2) [13] As this Court stated in the case of Margolin v HMQ, 2018 TCC 36, the Tax Court of Canada has interpreted on multiple occasions the statutory framework of intention and occupancy to determine use as a primary......
-
Fard v. The Queen, 2022 TCC 42
...factual circumstances. The use made of the property is often the best evidence of the purpose of the acquisition. [24] In Margolin v. HMQ, 2018 TCC 36, it was stated at paragraph 6: Subsection 254(2) requires intention to be determinative measured at the time the purchaser becomes legally b......
3 cases
-
Sindhi v. The King, 2023 TCC 102
...The Queen, 2016 TCC 13, a decision of Justice Smith; Kniazev v The Queen, 2019 TCC 58, a decision of Justice Smith; Margolin v The Queen, 2018 TCC 36, a decision of Deputy Judge Masse; Virani v The Queen, 2010 TCC 113, a decision of Justice Campbell; Berkovich v The Queen, 2014 TCC 268, a d......
-
Sozio v. The Queen, 2018 TCC 258
...intention to occupy has been frustrated. the requirements of subsection 254(2) [13] As this Court stated in the case of Margolin v HMQ, 2018 TCC 36, the Tax Court of Canada has interpreted on multiple occasions the statutory framework of intention and occupancy to determine use as a primary......
-
Fard v. The Queen, 2022 TCC 42
...factual circumstances. The use made of the property is often the best evidence of the purpose of the acquisition. [24] In Margolin v. HMQ, 2018 TCC 36, it was stated at paragraph 6: Subsection 254(2) requires intention to be determinative measured at the time the purchaser becomes legally b......