Marsh v. Kulchar, [1952] 1 SCR 330
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
Judge | Rinfret, Thibaudeau; Kellock, Roy Lindsay; Estey, James Wilfred; Locke, Charles Holland; Cartwright, John Robert |
Citation | [1952] 1 SCR 330,1951 CanLII 54 (SCC),[1952] 1 SCR 232,1951 CanLII 58 (SCC),1951 CanLII 27 (SCC),1951 CanLII 28 (SCC),[1951] CarswellBC 4,[1952] 1 SCR 259,[1951] SCJ No 42 (QL),[1952] 1 DLR 755,[1951] SCJ No 46 (QL),[1952] 1 DLR 593,14 CR 89,[1952] 1 SCR 275,[1952] 2 SCR 3,102 CCC 1,1951 CanLII 56 (SCC),[1952] 1 DLR 657,[1951] SCJ No 44 (QL),[1952] SCJ No 2 (QL),[1951] ACS no 46,[1951] ILR 350 |
Date | 17 December 1951 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
216 practice notes
-
R. v. Cook (D.W.), (1997) 210 N.R. 197 (SCC)
...left to the Crown's discretion absent evidence that this discretion was being abused - See paragraph 55. Cases Noticed: Lemay v. R., [1952] 1 S.C.R. 232, consd. [para. R. v. Stinchcombe, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 326; 130 N.R. 277; 120 A.R. 161; 8 W.A.C. 161; 68 C.C.C.(3d) 1; 8 C.R.(4th) 277, refd to......
-
Toronto (City) v. C.U.P.E., Local 79, [2003] 3 SCR 77
...2001 SCC 44; Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322 (1979); R. v. Regan, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 297, 2002 SCC 12; Lemay v. The King, [1952] 1 S.C.R. 232; R. v. Banks, [1916] 2 K.B. 621; Wilson v. The Queen, [1983] 2 S.C.R. 594; R. v. Sarson, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 223; R. v. Consolidated Maybrun Min......
-
R. v. Taillefer; R. v. Duguay, [2003] 3 SCR 307
...451; R. v. Chaplin, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 727; R. v. Carosella, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 80; R. v. C. (M.H.), [1991] 1 S.C.R. 763; Lemay v. The King, [1952] 1 S.C.R. 232; Duke v. The Queen, [1972] S.C.R. 917; Caccamo v. The Queen, [1976] 1 S.C.R. 786; Taillefer v. La Reine, [1989] R.J.Q. 2023; R. v. Savio......
-
R. v. Cook (D.W.), (1997) 188 N.B.R.(2d) 161 (SCC)
...left to the Crown's discretion absent evidence that this discretion was being abused - See paragraph 55. Cases Noticed: Lemay v. R., [1952] 1 S.C.R. 232, consd. [para. R. v. Stinchcombe, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 326; 130 N.R. 277; 120 A.R. 161; 8 W.A.C. 161; 68 C.C.C.(3d) 1; 8 C.R.(4th) 277, refd to......
Request a trial to view additional results
191 cases
-
R. v. Taillefer (B.), (2003) 313 N.R. 1 (SCC)
...80; 207 N.R. 321; 98 O.A.C. 81, refd to. [para. 61]. R. v. M.H.C., [1991] 1 S.C.R. 763; 123 N.R. 63, refd to. [para. 65]. Lemay v. R., [1952] 1 S.C.R. 232, refd to. [para. Duke v. R., [1972] S.C.R. 917, refd to. [para. 65]. R. v. Caccamo, [1976] 1 S.C.R. 786; 4 N.R. 133, refd to. [para. 65]......
-
R. v. Caron (G.), 2007 ABQB 262
...161, refd to. [para. 45]. Nelles v. Ontario et al., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 170; 98 N.R. 321; 35 O.A.C. 161, refd to. [para. 45]. R. v. Lemay, [1952] 1 S.C.R. 232, refd to. [para. R. v. Chamandy (1934), 61 C.C.C. 224 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 45]. R. v. 974649 Ontario Inc. et al. (1998), 114 O.A......
-
Toronto (City) v. Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79 et al., (2003) 311 N.R. 201 (SCC)
...[para. 27]. R. v. Regan (G.A.), [2002] 1 S.C.R. 297; 282 N.R. 1; 201 N.S.R.(2d) 63; 629 A.P.R. 63, refd to. [para. 31]. Lemay v. R., [1952] 1 S.C.R. 232, refd to. [para. R. v. Banks, [1916] 2 K.B. 621 (Eng. C.A.), refd to. [para. 31]. R. v. Wilson, [1983] 2 S.C.R. 594; 51 N.R. 321; 26 Man.R......
-
Grant et al. v. Torstar Corp. et al., (2009) 397 N.R. 1 (SCC)
...et al. (2001), 238 N.B.R.(2d) 112; 617 A.P.R. 112; 201 D.L.R.(4th) 75; 2001 NBCA 62, refd to. [para. 31]. Douglas v. Tucker, [1952] 1 S.C.R. 275, refd to. [para. 34]. Globe and Mail Ltd. v. Boland, [1960] S.C.R. 203, refd to. [para. 34]. Banks v. Globe and Mail Ltd., [1961] S.C.R. 474, refd......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
What They Wish They Knew Before Publishing
...2013 SKCA 21 8 See for example Wooding v. Little, (1982), 24 C.C.L.T. 37 (B.C.S.C.); Ward v. Clark 2001 BCCA 724; Tucker v. Douglas, [1952] 1 S.C.R. 275 9 Grant v. Torstar Corp., 2009 SCC 275; Quan v. Cusson, 2009 SCC 62 10 Hung v. Gardiner, 2003 BCCA 257 11 Sussman v. Eales, (1985) 33 CCLT......
23 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...202, 332 Law Society of Alberta v Sidhu, 2017 ABCA 224 ............................................... 194 Lemay v The King (1951), [1952] 1 SCR 232, 102 CCC 1, [1951] SCJ No 42 .......................................................................................... 515 Table of Cases 625......
-
The Defence of Qualified Privilege
...ONSC 5830 at paras 21–23 Botiuk v Toronto Free Press Publications Ltd , [1995] 3 SCR 3 per Cory J at 31, para 86 Douglas v Tucker , [1952] 1 SCR 275 at 286 per Cartwright J, citing Adam v Ward, [1917] AC 309 (HL) Was the Reply Restricted to a Speciic Audience? Roger D McConchie & David ......
-
Table of cases
...779 (Gen. Div).... 468, 492 Doucett v. Crowther (1992), 129 N.B.R. (2d) 1, 10 C.PC. (3d) 322 (Q.B/T.D.)) 720, 722 Douglas v. Tucker, [1952] 1 S.C.R. 275, 1 D.L.R. 657 276, 368, 373 , 374 , 391, 393, 395, 398, 407, 497, 500, 516, 888, 896 Dow Jones & Co. Inc. v. Gutnick, [2002] HCA 56, aff'g......
-
Table of Cases
...379 Douglas & Ors v. Hello! Ltd & Ors, [2007] UKHL 21 ............................................... 379, 400, 401 Douglas v. Tucker, [1952] 1 S.C.R. 275 .................................................................................... 25, 290 Dow Jones & Co. Inc. v. Jameel, [2005] EWCA......
Request a trial to view additional results