Marsh v. Kulchar
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | Rinfret, Thibaudeau; Kellock, Roy Lindsay; Estey, James Wilfred; Locke, Charles Holland; Cartwright, John Robert |
| Citation | [1952] 1 SCR 330,1951 CanLII 54 (SCC),[1952] 1 SCR 232,1951 CanLII 58 (SCC),1951 CanLII 27 (SCC),1951 CanLII 28 (SCC),[1951] CarswellBC 4,[1952] 1 SCR 259,[1951] SCJ No 42 (QL),[1952] 1 DLR 755,[1951] SCJ No 46 (QL),[1952] 1 DLR 593,14 CR 89,[1952] 1 SCR 275,[1952] 2 SCR 3,102 CCC 1,1951 CanLII 56 (SCC),[1952] 1 DLR 657,[1951] SCJ No 44 (QL),[1952] SCJ No 2 (QL),[1951] ACS no 46,[1951] ILR 350 |
| Date | 17 December 1951 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
229 practice notes
-
Bent v. Platnick
...2006 CanLII 41669; Burwash v. Williams, 2014 ONSC 6828; Daggitt v. Campbell, 2016 ONSC 2742, 131 O.R. (3d) 423; Douglas v. Tucker, [1952] 1 S.C.R. 275; Netupsky v. Craig, [1973] S.C.R. 55; McLoughlin v. Kutasy, [1979] 2 S.C.R. 311; Merit Consultants International Ltd. v. Chandler, 2014 BCCA......
-
Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto and Manning
...Despard, [1956] O.R. 963 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 145]. Netupsky v. Craig, [1973] S.C.R. 55, refd to. [para. 145]. Douglas v. Tucker, [1952] 1 S.C.R. 275, refd to. [para. Sun Life Assurance Co. v. Dalrymple, [1965] S.C.R. 302, refd to. [para. 148]. Gazette Printing Co. v. Shallow (1909), 41 ......
-
R. v. Taillefer; R. v. Duguay
...451; R. v. Chaplin, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 727; R. v. Carosella, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 80; R. v. C. (M.H.), [1991] 1 S.C.R. 763; Lemay v. The King, [1952] 1 S.C.R. 232; Duke v. The Queen, [1972] S.C.R. 917; Caccamo v. The Queen, [1976] 1 S.C.R. 786; Taillefer v. La Reine, [1989] R.J.Q. 2023; R. v. Savio......
-
Grant et al. v. Torstar Corp. et al.
...et al. (2001), 238 N.B.R.(2d) 112; 617 A.P.R. 112; 201 D.L.R.(4th) 75; 2001 NBCA 62, refd to. [para. 31]. Douglas v. Tucker, [1952] 1 S.C.R. 275, refd to. [para. 34]. Globe and Mail Ltd. v. Boland, [1960] S.C.R. 203, refd to. [para. 34]. Banks v. Globe and Mail Ltd., [1961] S.C.R. 474, refd......
Get Started for Free
198 cases
-
Toronto (City) v. Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79 et al., (2003) 311 N.R. 201 (SCC)
...[para. 27]. R. v. Regan (G.A.), [2002] 1 S.C.R. 297; 282 N.R. 1; 201 N.S.R.(2d) 63; 629 A.P.R. 63, refd to. [para. 31]. Lemay v. R., [1952] 1 S.C.R. 232, refd to. [para. R. v. Banks, [1916] 2 K.B. 621 (Eng. C.A.), refd to. [para. 31]. R. v. Wilson, [1983] 2 S.C.R. 594; 51 N.R. 321; 26 Man.R......
-
R. v. Regan (G.A.), 2002 SCC 12
...v. Curragh Inc. et al., [1997] 1 S.C.R. 537 ; 209 N.R. 252 ; 159 N.S.R.(2d) 1 ; 468 A.P.R. 1 , refd to. [para. 130]. Lemay v. R., [1952] 1 S.C.R. 232, refd to. [para. 137]. R. v. Stinchcombe, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 326 ; 130 N.R. 277 ; 120 A.R. 161 ; 8 W.A.C. 161, refd to. [para. 137]. R. v......
-
Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto and Manning
...Despard, [1956] O.R. 963 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 145]. Netupsky v. Craig, [1973] S.C.R. 55, refd to. [para. 145]. Douglas v. Tucker, [1952] 1 S.C.R. 275, refd to. [para. Sun Life Assurance Co. v. Dalrymple, [1965] S.C.R. 302, refd to. [para. 148]. Gazette Printing Co. v. Shallow (1909), 41 ......
-
R. v. Taillefer; R. v. Duguay
...451; R. v. Chaplin, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 727; R. v. Carosella, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 80; R. v. C. (M.H.), [1991] 1 S.C.R. 763; Lemay v. The King, [1952] 1 S.C.R. 232; Duke v. The Queen, [1972] S.C.R. 917; Caccamo v. The Queen, [1976] 1 S.C.R. 786; Taillefer v. La Reine, [1989] R.J.Q. 2023; R. v. Savio......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
What They Wish They Knew Before Publishing
...2013 SKCA 21 8 See for example Wooding v. Little, (1982), 24 C.C.L.T. 37 (B.C.S.C.); Ward v. Clark 2001 BCCA 724; Tucker v. Douglas, [1952] 1 S.C.R. 275 9 Grant v. Torstar Corp., 2009 SCC 275; Quan v. Cusson, 2009 SCC 62 10 Hung v. Gardiner, 2003 BCCA 257 11 Sussman v. Eales, (1985) 33 CCLT......
33 books & journal articles
-
The Defence of Qualified Privilege
...ONSC 5830 at paras 21–23 Botiuk v Toronto Free Press Publications Ltd , [1995] 3 SCR 3 per Cory J at 31, para 86 Douglas v Tucker , [1952] 1 SCR 275 at 286 per Cartwright J, citing Adam v Ward, [1917] AC 309 (HL) Was the Reply Restricted to a Speciic Audience? Roger D McConchie & David ......
-
Table of cases
...202, 332 Law Society of Alberta v Sidhu, 2017 ABCA 224 ............................................... 194 Lemay v The King (1951), [1952] 1 SCR 232, 102 CCC 1, [1951] SCJ No 42 .......................................................................................... 515 Table of Cases 625......
-
Table of Cases
...435 Dickason v Dickason, [1913] HCA 77, (1913) 17 CLR 50 ........................................................ 462 Douglas v Tucker, [1952] 1 SCR 275 ...................................................................180, 181, 183, 217 Dow Jones and Company Inc v Gutnick, [2002] HCA 56, ......
-
The Trial Process
...by a person under eighteen or with a physical or mental dis- 132 R. v. Hodgson , [1998] 2 S.C.R. 449. 133 See Lemay v. The King , [1952] 1 S.C.R. 232; R. v. Yebes , [1987] 2 S.C.R. 168; Cook , above note 126; Jolivet , above note 126. 134 R.S.C. 1985, c. C-5. 135 Cook , above note 126. 136 ......
Get Started for Free
