Marshall v. Saskatchewan, Petz and Adams, (1982) 20 Sask.R. 309 (CA)
Judge | Bayda, C.J.S., Tallis and Cameron, JJ.A. |
Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
Case Date | November 19, 1982 |
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Citations | (1982), 20 Sask.R. 309 (CA);1982 CanLII 2387 (SK CA);[1983] 2 WWR 92;20 Sask R 309 |
Marshall v. Sask. (1982), 20 Sask.R. 309 (CA)
MLB headnote and full text
Marshall v. Saskatchewan, Government of, Petz and Adams
(No. 7836)
Indexed As: Marshall v. Saskatchewan, Petz and Adams
Saskatchewan Court of Appeal
Bayda, C.J.S., Tallis and Cameron, JJ.A.
November 19, 1982.
Summary:
Marshall was dismissed by the Government of Saskatchewan and Marshall claimed damages for wrongful dismissal. The defendants applied to strike out the Marshall's statement of claim. The Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench allowed the application on the ground that the statement of claim disclosed no cause of action - See 16 Sask.R. 219. Marshall appealed to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal.
The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and set aside the order which struck out the statement of claim.
Practice - Topic 2230
Pleadings - Striking out pleadings - Grounds, failure to disclose a cause of action - Marshall was dismissed by the Government of Saskatchewan and Marshall claimed damages for wrongful dismissal - Before trial Marshall's statement of claim was struck out for failure to disclose a cause of action - The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal set aside the order and held that the matter was not so clear that the statement of claim should be struck out.
Practice - Topic 1460
Pleadings - Statement of claim - Pleading in the alternative - The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal stated that it is possible to plead separate causes of action in a statement of claim (see paragraph 6).
Cases Noticed:
Attorney General of Canada v. Inuit Tapirisat of Canada and the National Anti-poverty Organization, 33 N.R. 304; [1980] 2 S.C.R. 735, refd to. [para. 3].
Gould v. Stuart, [1896] A.C. 575, refd to. [para. 4].
Nova Scotia Government Employees Association et al. v. Civil Service Commission of Nova Scotia et al. (1981), 33 N.R. 103; 119 D.L.R.(3d) 1 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 4].
Clarke v. Attorney-General for Ontario et al. (1965), 54 D.L.R.(2d) 577 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 5].
Bhadauria v. Seneca College (1981), 37 N.R. 455 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 5].
Einhorn v. Westmount Investments Ltd. and Belzberg et al. (1969), 69 W.W.R. 31, refd to. [para. 6].
Farrel v. Duperow Co-Operative Association Limited, 3 Sask.R. 218; [1979] 5 W.W.R. 498, refd to. [para. 7].
Statutes Noticed:
Rules of Court (Sask.), rule 139(1) [para. 8], rule 173.
Public Service Act, R.S.S. 1978, c. P-42 [para. 4].
Counsel:
Dr. M.C. Shumiatcher, Q.C., and Gregory Murphy, for the appellant;
T.C. Wakeling, Q.C., for the respondents.
This appeal was heard by BAYDA, C.J.S., TALLIS and CAMERON, JJ.A., of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal.
The judgment of the Court of Appeal was delivered orally by TALLIS, J.A., on November 19, 1982.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Boyd et al. v. Eacom Timber Corp., (2012) 400 Sask.R. 31 (QB)
...cases and where the court is satisfied that the case is beyond doubt: Marshall v. Saskatchewan, Government of, Petz and Adams (1983), 20 Sask. R. 309 (C.A.); The Attorney General of Canada v. Inuit Tapirisat , [1980] 2 S.C.R. 735. The court may consider only the statement of claim, any part......
-
International Capital Corp. et al. v. Schafer et al., (1995) 130 Sask.R. 23 (QB)
...v. Eastbourne Investments Ltd. et al. (1994), 124 Sask.R. 97 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 6]. Marshall v. Saskatchewan, Petz and Adams (1982), 20 Sask.R. 309 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Inuit Tapirisat of Canada and National Anti-Poverty Organization v. Canada (Attorney General), [1980] 2 S.C.R. 735......
-
Downey v. Royal Canadian Mounted Police, 2002 SKQB 20
...v. Canada (Attorney General), [1980] 2 S.C.R. 735; 33 N.R. 304, refd to. [para. 20]. Marshall v. Saskatchewan, Petz and Adams, [1983] 2 W.W.R. 92; 20 Sask.R. 309 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Sagon v. Royal Bank of Canada et al. (1992), 105 Sask.R. 133; 32 W.A.C. 133 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 20]. ......
-
RoyNat Inc. v. Northland Properties Ltd. et al., (1993) 115 Sask.R. 272 (QB)
...Division No. 29, [1992] 2 W.W.R. 481; 100 Sask.R. 1; 18 W.A.C. 1 (C.A.), consd. [para. 19]. Marshall v. Saskatchewan, Petz and Adams, [1983] 2 W.W.R. 92; 20 Sask.R. 309 (C.A.), refd to. [para. American Hoist of Canada Ltd. v. Schule (1983), 29 Sask.R. 47 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 24]. McKay (......
-
Boyd et al. v. Eacom Timber Corp., (2012) 400 Sask.R. 31 (QB)
...cases and where the court is satisfied that the case is beyond doubt: Marshall v. Saskatchewan, Government of, Petz and Adams (1983), 20 Sask. R. 309 (C.A.); The Attorney General of Canada v. Inuit Tapirisat , [1980] 2 S.C.R. 735. The court may consider only the statement of claim, any part......
-
International Capital Corp. et al. v. Schafer et al., (1995) 130 Sask.R. 23 (QB)
...v. Eastbourne Investments Ltd. et al. (1994), 124 Sask.R. 97 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 6]. Marshall v. Saskatchewan, Petz and Adams (1982), 20 Sask.R. 309 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Inuit Tapirisat of Canada and National Anti-Poverty Organization v. Canada (Attorney General), [1980] 2 S.C.R. 735......
-
Downey v. Royal Canadian Mounted Police, 2002 SKQB 20
...v. Canada (Attorney General), [1980] 2 S.C.R. 735; 33 N.R. 304, refd to. [para. 20]. Marshall v. Saskatchewan, Petz and Adams, [1983] 2 W.W.R. 92; 20 Sask.R. 309 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Sagon v. Royal Bank of Canada et al. (1992), 105 Sask.R. 133; 32 W.A.C. 133 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 20]. ......
-
RoyNat Inc. v. Northland Properties Ltd. et al., (1993) 115 Sask.R. 272 (QB)
...Division No. 29, [1992] 2 W.W.R. 481; 100 Sask.R. 1; 18 W.A.C. 1 (C.A.), consd. [para. 19]. Marshall v. Saskatchewan, Petz and Adams, [1983] 2 W.W.R. 92; 20 Sask.R. 309 (C.A.), refd to. [para. American Hoist of Canada Ltd. v. Schule (1983), 29 Sask.R. 47 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 24]. McKay (......