Mathur v. Ontario

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeJustice Carole J. Brown
Neutral Citation2020 ONSC 6918
Docket NumberCV-19-00631627
Date12 November 2020
Citation2020 ONSC 6918
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
19 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 26-30)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 2, 2021
    ...General), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 624 , Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v. Canada (Minister of Justice), 2000 SCC 69 , Mathur v. Ontario, 2020 ONSC 6918, Ward v. Vancouver (City), 2010 SCC 27 , Henry v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 24 , Brazeau v. Canada (Attorney General)......
  • La Rose v. Canada
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • December 13, 2023
    ...no report ever having been prepared. [44] I also note the decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Mathur v. Ontario, 2020 ONSC 6918, 42 C.E.L.R. (4th) 124 [Mathur 2020]. There, like here, the underlying issue was a Charter challenge to the adequacy of a government’s re......
  • LET OUR LIVING TREE GROW: BEYOND NON-JUSTICIABILITY FOR THE ADJUDICATION OF WICKED PROBLEMS.
    • Canada
    • University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review Vol. 81 No. 1, January 2023
    • January 1, 2023
    ...Canada, 2019 QCCS 2885 , rev'd 2021 QCCA 1871 [Environnement Jeunesse]; La Rose v Canada, 2020 FC 1008 [La Rose], Mathur v Ontario, 2020 ONSC 6918 [Mathur]; Misdzi Yikh v Canada, 2020 FC 1059 [Misdzi Yikh]. See generally Nathalie J Chalifour, Jessica Earle & Laura Macintyre, "Com......
  • Lho'Imggin v. Canada, 2025 FC 1586
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 26, 2025
    ...GHG reduction targets and replacing them with a much smaller reduction target (Mathur Appeal at para 2; see also Mathur v Ontario, 2020 ONSC 6918 at para [84] In contrast, the Dini Ze’ say that Canada’s response to the alleged target (i.e., the Temperature Commitment), as described by Sched......
  • Get Started for Free
6 cases
  • La Rose v. Canada
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • December 13, 2023
    ...no report ever having been prepared. [44] I also note the decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Mathur v. Ontario, 2020 ONSC 6918, 42 C.E.L.R. (4th) 124 [Mathur 2020]. There, like here, the underlying issue was a Charter challenge to the adequacy of a government’s re......
  • Lho'Imggin v. Canada, 2025 FC 1586
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 26, 2025
    ...GHG reduction targets and replacing them with a much smaller reduction target (Mathur Appeal at para 2; see also Mathur v Ontario, 2020 ONSC 6918 at para [84] In contrast, the Dini Ze’ say that Canada’s response to the alleged target (i.e., the Temperature Commitment), as described by Sched......
  • Mathur v. His Majesty the King in Right of Ontario
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 14, 2023
    ...Rule 21 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.  The motion was dismissed by Justice C.J. Brown on November 12, 2020: Mathur v. Ontario, 2020 ONSC 6918 [32]           Ontario’s position on the motion to strike was that the Application w......
  • Meekis v. Ontario
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • July 26, 2021
    ...to non-Indigenous Ontarians living off-reserve. [159]    Moreover, C.J. Brown J.’s decision in Mathur v. Ontario, 2020 ONSC 6918, leave to appeal refused, 2021 ONSC 1624 (Div. Ct.) reinforces my conclusion that the motion judge misapplied Auton in striking the appell......
  • Get Started for Free
11 firm's commentaries
2 books & journal articles
  • LET OUR LIVING TREE GROW: BEYOND NON-JUSTICIABILITY FOR THE ADJUDICATION OF WICKED PROBLEMS.
    • Canada
    • University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review Vol. 81 No. 1, January 2023
    • January 1, 2023
    ...Canada, 2019 QCCS 2885 , rev'd 2021 QCCA 1871 [Environnement Jeunesse]; La Rose v Canada, 2020 FC 1008 [La Rose], Mathur v Ontario, 2020 ONSC 6918 [Mathur]; Misdzi Yikh v Canada, 2020 FC 1059 [Misdzi Yikh]. See generally Nathalie J Chalifour, Jessica Earle & Laura Macintyre, "Com......
  • Boom or Bust: The Public Trust Doctrine in Canadian Climate Change Litigation.
    • Canada
    • March 22, 2024
    ...Heera Sen, Rudi Barwin, and Haadia Khalid for their research assistance. (1.) La Rose v Canada, 2020 FC 1008 [La Rose]; Mathur v Ontario, 2020 ONSC 6918 [Mathur 2020]; Mathur v Ontario, 2023 ONSC 2316 [Mathur 2025]; EnvironnementJeunesse c Procureur general du Canada, 2021 QCCA (2.) This ar......