Matthews v. Stikeman Elliott LLP, 2020 BCSC 967

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeMaster Harper
Citation2020 BCSC 967
Docket NumberS1711714
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Date29 June 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
1 practice notes
  • Mee Hoi Bros. Company Ltd. v. Borving Investments (Canada) Ltd., 2020 BCSC 1999
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 16 d3 Dezembro d3 2020
    ...is included in the definition of “proceeding” in the Rules (Holmes Greenslade at para. 9; Matthews v. Stikeman Elliott LLP, 2020 BCSC 967 at para. 11) and would thus also fall under the ambit of Rule 18-1 since it deals with a “proceeding” under the Rules. [124]&......
1 cases
  • Mee Hoi Bros. Company Ltd. v. Borving Investments (Canada) Ltd., 2020 BCSC 1999
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 16 d3 Dezembro d3 2020
    ...is included in the definition of “proceeding” in the Rules (Holmes Greenslade at para. 9; Matthews v. Stikeman Elliott LLP, 2020 BCSC 967 at para. 11) and would thus also fall under the ambit of Rule 18-1 since it deals with a “proceeding” under the Rules. [124]&......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT