Mawdsley v. Meshen Estate et al., 2010 BCSC 1099

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeBallance, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterFRAUD AND MISREPRESENTATION,FAMILY LAW,EQUITY,GIFTS,TRUSTS
Citation2010 BCSC 1099,[2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1099 (SC),[2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1099
Date05 August 2010
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
20 practice notes
  • Mawdsley v. Meshen Estate et al., (2012) 317 B.C.A.C. 247 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • February 28, 2012
    ...background at some length. It is set out in much greater detail by the trial judge, Madam Justice Ballance, in her reasons indexed as 2010 BCSC 1099. Factual Background [9] The appellant Mr. Dennis Mawdsley and the settlor Ms. Joan Meshen, both of whom were born in 1929, began living togeth......
  • Eckford v. Vanderwood et al., (2014) 357 B.C.A.C. 277 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • May 26, 2014
    ...Estate, [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1868; 2010 BCSC 1868, refd to. [para. 47]. Mawdsley v. Meshen Estate et al., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1099; 2010 BCSC 1099, affd. (2012), 317 B.C.A.C. 247; 540 W.A.C. 247; 2012 BCCA 91, refd to. [para. 47]. Dunsdon v. Dunsdon et al., [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1274; 20......
  • Unger v. Unger Estate, 2017 BCSC 1946
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 30, 2017
    ...2015 BCSC 1741 at paras. 73-82; Saugestad v. Saugestad, 2006 BCSC 1839, varied on different grounds 2008 BCCA 38; Mawdsley v. Meshen, 2010 BCSC 1099, affirmed 2012 BCCA 91; Ciarniello v. James 2016 BCSC 1699][100] The moral duty of a testator in a second marriage was also considered by Russ......
  • Hancock v. Hancock, [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2398
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 18, 2014
    ...to her at that time, are to be taken into consideration to determine whether she has made adequate provision: Mawdsley v. Meshen , 2010 BCSC 1099 at para. 317, aff'd 2012 BCCA 91; Eckford v . Vanderwood, 2014 BCCA 261 at para. 53. [58] It is uncontroversial that neither the plaintiffs nor M......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
20 cases
  • Mawdsley v. Meshen Estate et al., (2012) 317 B.C.A.C. 247 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • February 28, 2012
    ...background at some length. It is set out in much greater detail by the trial judge, Madam Justice Ballance, in her reasons indexed as 2010 BCSC 1099. Factual Background [9] The appellant Mr. Dennis Mawdsley and the settlor Ms. Joan Meshen, both of whom were born in 1929, began living togeth......
  • Eckford v. Vanderwood et al., (2014) 357 B.C.A.C. 277 (CA)
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • May 26, 2014
    ...Estate, [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1868; 2010 BCSC 1868, refd to. [para. 47]. Mawdsley v. Meshen Estate et al., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1099; 2010 BCSC 1099, affd. (2012), 317 B.C.A.C. 247; 540 W.A.C. 247; 2012 BCCA 91, refd to. [para. 47]. Dunsdon v. Dunsdon et al., [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1274; 20......
  • Unger v. Unger Estate, 2017 BCSC 1946
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 30, 2017
    ...2015 BCSC 1741 at paras. 73-82; Saugestad v. Saugestad, 2006 BCSC 1839, varied on different grounds 2008 BCCA 38; Mawdsley v. Meshen, 2010 BCSC 1099, affirmed 2012 BCCA 91; Ciarniello v. James 2016 BCSC 1699][100] The moral duty of a testator in a second marriage was also considered by Russ......
  • Hancock v. Hancock, [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2398
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 18, 2014
    ...to her at that time, are to be taken into consideration to determine whether she has made adequate provision: Mawdsley v. Meshen , 2010 BCSC 1099 at para. 317, aff'd 2012 BCCA 91; Eckford v . Vanderwood, 2014 BCCA 261 at para. 53. [58] It is uncontroversial that neither the plaintiffs nor M......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT