May v. Ferndale Institution,
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, Beverley; Major, John C.; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; LeBel, Louis; Deschamps, Marie; Fish, Morris J.; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Charron, Louise |
| Citation | 2005 SCC 82,[2005] 3 SCR 809,[2005] SCJ No 84 (QL),136 CRR (2d) 146,[2006] 5 WWR 65,261 DLR (4th) 541,343 NR 69,220 BCAC 1,49 BCLR (4th) 199,204 CCC (3d) 1,JE 2006-103,34 CR (6th) 228,38 Admin LR (4th) 1,68 WCB (2d) 59 |
| Date | 22 December 2005 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 30083 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
299 practice notes
-
Bent v. Platnick
...3; Palmer v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759; R.P. v. R.C., 2011 SCC 65, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 819; May v. Ferndale Institution, 2005 SCC 82, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 809; United States of America v. Shulman, 2001 SCC 21, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 616; Public School Boards’ Assn. of Alberta v. Alberta (Attorney Gene......
-
Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Chhina
...of Employment and Immigration) (1989), 69 O.R. (2d) 253, Reza v. Canada, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 394, and May v. Ferndale Institution, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 809. Each of these decisions emphasized that the habeas corpus‑like remedies available in the IRPA scheme are as broad as or broader than the......
-
Barendregt v. Grebliunas
...[1994] 2 S.C.R. 165; United States of America v. Shulman, 2001 SCC 21, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 616; May v. Ferndale Institution, 2005 SCC 82, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 809; R. v. Taillefer, 2003 SCC 70, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 307; Public School Boards’ Assn. of Alberta v. Alberta (Attorney General), 2000 SCC 2, [20......
-
D.G. v. Bowden Institution (Warden) et al., (2016) 612 A.R. 231
...for hearing or hearing of appeals together - [See Practice - Topic 8985 ]. Cases Noticed: May et al. v. Ferndale Institution et al., [2005] 3 S.C.R. 809; 343 N.R. 69 ; 220 B.C.A.C. 1 ; 362 W.A.C. 1 ; 2005 SCC 82 , consd. [paras. 13; 101, footnote 33; 158]. Khela v. Mission Institution (......
Get Started for Free
260 cases
-
Bent v. Platnick,
...3; Palmer v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759; R.P. v. R.C., 2011 SCC 65, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 819; May v. Ferndale Institution, 2005 SCC 82, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 809; United States of America v. Shulman, 2001 SCC 21, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 616; Public School Boards’ Assn. of Alberta v. Alberta (Attorney Gene......
-
Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Chhina,
...of Employment and Immigration) (1989), 69 O.R. (2d) 253, Reza v. Canada, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 394, and May v. Ferndale Institution, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 809. Each of these decisions emphasized that the habeas corpus‑like remedies available in the IRPA scheme are as broad as or broader than the......
-
Barendregt v. Grebliunas,
...[1994] 2 S.C.R. 165; United States of America v. Shulman, 2001 SCC 21, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 616; May v. Ferndale Institution, 2005 SCC 82, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 809; R. v. Taillefer, 2003 SCC 70, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 307; Public School Boards’ Assn. of Alberta v. Alberta (Attorney General), 2000 SCC 2, [20......
-
D.G. v. Bowden Institution (Warden) et al., (2016) 612 A.R. 231
...for hearing or hearing of appeals together - [See Practice - Topic 8985 ]. Cases Noticed: May et al. v. Ferndale Institution et al., [2005] 3 S.C.R. 809; 343 N.R. 69 ; 220 B.C.A.C. 1 ; 362 W.A.C. 1 ; 2005 SCC 82 , consd. [paras. 13; 101, footnote 33; 158]. Khela v. Mission Institution (......
Get Started for Free
36 books & journal articles
-
Rights in the Criminal Process
...decision.” 130 127 R v thomsen , [1988] 1 SCR 640. 128 R v orbanski; R v Elias , [2005] 2 SCR 3. 129 May v Ferndale institute , [2005] 3 SCR 809 at para 21. 130 ibid at para 44. Right s in the Criminal Process 305 e. rights of persons Charged with an offenCe Section 11 of the Charter deals ......
-
Rights in the Criminal Process
...however, particularly in the realm of the criminal 233 Mission Institution v Khela , [2014] 1 SCR 502. 234 May v Ferndale Institute , [2005] 3 SCR 809 at para 21. THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS 352 law, is that more often than not, what is at issue is not the solemn pronouncement of Par......
-
Table of Cases
...3 SCR 737, 2004 SCC 81, 247 DLR (4th) 577 ................................................................ 305 May v Ferndale Institute, [2005] 3 SCR 809, 2005 SCC 82, 261 DLR (4th) 541 ...................................................................................... 304 McKinney v Uni......
-
Charter Rights in the Criminal Process
...the maximum punishment for the offence is imprisonment for five years or a more severe punishment; 109 May v. Ferndale institute, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 809 at para. 21. 110 ibid . at para. 44. 111 R . v. Wigglesworth , [1987] 2 S.C.R. 541, 45 D.L.R. (4th) 235 [ Wigglesworth ]. A person subject to......
Get Started for Free