McEwan v. McEwan Estate, [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 96

CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateJanuary 23, 2015
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 96;2015 BCSC 96;[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 96 (SC Reg.)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Legal Research and Writing. Fourth Edition
    • 23 June 2016
    ...382 McCoy v Tepper, 690 NYS2d 678 (App Div 1999) .......................................382–83 McEwan v McEwan Estate, 2015 BCSC 96 .......................................................... 24 McKnight v Hutchison, 2008 BCSC 101 (Dist Reg) ...................................... 15, 22 McNu......
  • Introduction to Legal Research and Writing
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Legal Research and Writing. Fourth Edition
    • 23 June 2016
    ...49 Ibid at para 13. For other decisions from BC where online charges were disallowed as being overhead, see also McEwan v McEwan Estate , 2015 BCSC 96 at paras 38–40, and Semenoff Estate v Bridgeman , 2014 BCSC 1845 at para 83. 50 2009 NSSM 35. Introduction to Legal Research and Writing 25 ......
  • Price v. 481530 B.C. Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 24 November 2020
    ...has not been shown to have been unavailable on free sources. See Semenoff Estate v. Bridgeman, 2014 BCSC 1845 and McEwan v. McEwan Estate, 2015 BCSC 96. Office [83]       The plaintiff seeks 220.75 in office stationary. Office stationary is traditionally viewed......
  • Kakavelakis v. Boutsakis,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 23 August 2021
    ...point out that the consent order consisted of one paragraph, and compares this to other orders, for example in McEwan v. McEwan Estate, 2015 BCSC 96, where 2 units were allowed for an order to amend [80]        Although it was a short order, it still had t......
2 cases
  • Price v. 481530 B.C. Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 24 November 2020
    ...has not been shown to have been unavailable on free sources. See Semenoff Estate v. Bridgeman, 2014 BCSC 1845 and McEwan v. McEwan Estate, 2015 BCSC 96. Office [83]       The plaintiff seeks 220.75 in office stationary. Office stationary is traditionally viewed......
  • Kakavelakis v. Boutsakis,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 23 August 2021
    ...point out that the consent order consisted of one paragraph, and compares this to other orders, for example in McEwan v. McEwan Estate, 2015 BCSC 96, where 2 units were allowed for an order to amend [80]        Although it was a short order, it still had t......
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Legal Research and Writing. Fourth Edition
    • 23 June 2016
    ...382 McCoy v Tepper, 690 NYS2d 678 (App Div 1999) .......................................382–83 McEwan v McEwan Estate, 2015 BCSC 96 .......................................................... 24 McKnight v Hutchison, 2008 BCSC 101 (Dist Reg) ...................................... 15, 22 McNu......
  • Introduction to Legal Research and Writing
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Legal Research and Writing. Fourth Edition
    • 23 June 2016
    ...49 Ibid at para 13. For other decisions from BC where online charges were disallowed as being overhead, see also McEwan v McEwan Estate , 2015 BCSC 96 at paras 38–40, and Semenoff Estate v Bridgeman , 2014 BCSC 1845 at para 83. 50 2009 NSSM 35. Introduction to Legal Research and Writing 25 ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT