Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Canada | +1 (343) 700 0450

McKay v Prowse, 2018 ABQB 975

Judgment Cited authorities 19 Cited in 7 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JudgeJ.M. Ross
Citation2018 ABQB 975
Docket Number0903 13422
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Date29 November 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • Cochrane (Town) v Austech Holdings Inc,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • November 21, 2022
    ...Thus, both avenues should have been pursued in tandem. As Master Schulz said in McKay v Prowse, 2017 ABQB 694 at para 20, affirmed 2018 ABQB 975, further affirmed 2020 ABCA 131, “[c]ounsel must practice with one eye on settlement and another on the requirements of the Rules of Did th......
  • Cochrane (Town) v Austech Holdings Inc,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 20, 2021
    ...Thus, both avenues should have been pursued in tandem. As Master Schulz said in McKay v Prowse, 2017 ABQB 694 at para 20, affirmed 2018 ABQB 975, further affirmed 2020 ABCA 131, "[c]ounsel must practice with one eye on settlement and another on the requirements of the Rules of [163]&#x......
  • McKay v Cody,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 21, 2021
    ...6, 2018. Justice Ross rendered her written decision on November 29, 2018 upholding the decision of Master Schulz to dismiss the action (2018 ABQB 975). A further appeal to the Court of Appeal was dismissed on April 3, 2020 (2020 ABCA [3]         ......
  • M H v Roman Catholic Diocese of Calgary, 2020 ABQB 397
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 10, 2020
    ...525812 Alberta Ltd v Purewal, 2004 ABQB 938; 13.  Slovak v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 ABQB 761; 14.  McKay v Prowse, 2018 ABQB 975; 15.  Sutherland v Brown, 2018 ABCA 123; 16.  Brace v McKen, 2019 ABCA 135; 17.  330626 Alberta Ltd v Ho & Laviolette Engineer......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • Cochrane (Town) v Austech Holdings Inc,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • November 21, 2022
    ...Thus, both avenues should have been pursued in tandem. As Master Schulz said in McKay v Prowse, 2017 ABQB 694 at para 20, affirmed 2018 ABQB 975, further affirmed 2020 ABCA 131, “[c]ounsel must practice with one eye on settlement and another on the requirements of the Rules of Did th......
  • Cochrane (Town) v Austech Holdings Inc,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 20, 2021
    ...Thus, both avenues should have been pursued in tandem. As Master Schulz said in McKay v Prowse, 2017 ABQB 694 at para 20, affirmed 2018 ABQB 975, further affirmed 2020 ABCA 131, "[c]ounsel must practice with one eye on settlement and another on the requirements of the Rules of [163]&#x......
  • McKay v Cody,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 21, 2021
    ...6, 2018. Justice Ross rendered her written decision on November 29, 2018 upholding the decision of Master Schulz to dismiss the action (2018 ABQB 975). A further appeal to the Court of Appeal was dismissed on April 3, 2020 (2020 ABCA [3]         ......
  • M H v Roman Catholic Diocese of Calgary, 2020 ABQB 397
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 10, 2020
    ...525812 Alberta Ltd v Purewal, 2004 ABQB 938; 13.  Slovak v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 ABQB 761; 14.  McKay v Prowse, 2018 ABQB 975; 15.  Sutherland v Brown, 2018 ABCA 123; 16.  Brace v McKen, 2019 ABCA 135; 17.  330626 Alberta Ltd v Ho & Laviolette Engineer......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT