McMillan v. Altastream Power Systems Inc., 2018 BCSC 1298

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHonourable Madam Justice Choi
Citation2018 BCSC 1298
Docket NumberS1510786
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Date02 August 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Can-West Development Ltd. v. Parmar, 2019 BCSC 1573
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 18 Septiembre 2019
    ...interpretation is no longer limited to the “four corners” of a written contract. As put in McMillan v. Altastream Power Systems Inc., 2018 BCSC 1298 at para. 62, “the contract should be informed by the surrounding factual matrix”. While the relevant surrounding circumstances will differ acc......
  • Anderson Estate (Re), 2020 ABQB 428
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 24 Julio 2020
    ...to para 24 of Can-West Development Ltd v Parmar, 2019 BCSC 1573, where the Court quotes from McMillan v Altastream Power Systems Inc, 2018 BCSC 1298 at para True legal ambiguity occurs where a phrase is reasonably susceptible of more than one meaning (Hi-Tech Group Inc. v. Sears Canada Inc.......
  • Tai An Holding Company Ltd. v. Boyal,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 17 Mayo 2022
    ...the reasons for those negotiations”: Can-West Development at para. 23, applying McMillan v. Altastream Power Systems Inc., 2018 BCSC 1298 at [51]       The case law both before and after Sattva suggests that evidence as to the surrounding circumstan......
3 cases
  • Can-West Development Ltd. v. Parmar, 2019 BCSC 1573
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 18 Septiembre 2019
    ...interpretation is no longer limited to the “four corners” of a written contract. As put in McMillan v. Altastream Power Systems Inc., 2018 BCSC 1298 at para. 62, “the contract should be informed by the surrounding factual matrix”. While the relevant surrounding circumstances will differ acc......
  • Anderson Estate (Re), 2020 ABQB 428
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 24 Julio 2020
    ...to para 24 of Can-West Development Ltd v Parmar, 2019 BCSC 1573, where the Court quotes from McMillan v Altastream Power Systems Inc, 2018 BCSC 1298 at para True legal ambiguity occurs where a phrase is reasonably susceptible of more than one meaning (Hi-Tech Group Inc. v. Sears Canada Inc.......
  • Tai An Holding Company Ltd. v. Boyal,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 17 Mayo 2022
    ...the reasons for those negotiations”: Can-West Development at para. 23, applying McMillan v. Altastream Power Systems Inc., 2018 BCSC 1298 at [51]       The case law both before and after Sattva suggests that evidence as to the surrounding circumstan......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT