McNeill Electronics Ltd. v. American Sensors Electronics Inc., (1996) 15 O.T.C. 20 (GD)
Judge | Molloy, J. |
Court | Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada) |
Case Date | October 02, 1996 |
Jurisdiction | Ontario |
Citations | (1996), 15 O.T.C. 20 (GD) |
McNeill Electronics Ltd. v. Am. Sensors (1996), 15 O.T.C. 20 (GD)
MLB headnote and full text
McNeill Electronics Limited (plaintiff/responding party) v. American Sensors Electronics Inc. (defendant/moving party)
(Court File No. 96-CU-98950-CM)
Indexed As: McNeill Electronics Ltd. v. American Sensors Electronics Inc.
Ontario Court of Justice
General Division
Molloy, J.
October 7, 1996.
Summary:
A case management action was placed on the "fast track". The defendant was noted in default. The defendant applied to set aside the noting in default.
The Ontario Court (General Division) dismissed the motion. The defendant repeatedly and persistently disregarded the Rules of Civil Procedure. Delaying the trial could result in the financial ruin of the plaintiff. The fact that it was a fast track case management action was an aggravating factor.
Practice - Topic 37
Actions - Conduct of - General - Case management - See paragraph 14.
Practice - Topic 6197
Judgments and orders - Setting aside default judgments (incl. noting in default) - Grounds - See paragraphs 1 to 16.
Cases Noticed:
Opoku v. Pruitt (1993), 14 O.R.(3d) 107 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 14].
Counsel:
Mark H. Arnold, for the plaintiff;
C.H. Freeman, for the defendant.
This motion was heard on October 2, 1996, before Molloy, J., of the Ontario Court (General Division), who released the following judgment on October 7, 1996.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Nobosoft Corporation v. No Borders, Inc.,
...et al. (1991), 49 O.A.C. 1; 3 O.R.(3d) 278 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 3]. McNeill Electronics Ltd. v. American Sensors Electronics Inc. (1998), 15 O.T.C. 20; 5 C.P.C.(4th) 266 (Gen. Div.), revd. 108 O.A.C. 257 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Jonathan L. Rosenstein, for the appellants; Edward L. D'Agos......
-
McNeill Electronics Ltd. v. American Sensors Electronics Inc., (1998) 58 O.T.C. 305 (GD)
...Summary: McNeill Electronics Ltd. sued American Sensors Electronics Inc. (ASEI). ASEI was noted in default. In a decision reported [1996] 15 O.T.C. 20, a motion to set aside the noting in default was dismissed and McNeill obtained default judgment. In a decision not reported in this series ......
-
McNeill Electronics Ltd. v. American Sensors Electronics Inc., (1998) 108 O.A.C. 257 (CA)
...in default. The defendant applied to set aside the noting in default. The Ontario Court (General Division), in a decision reported at 15 O.T.C. 20, dismissed the motion. The defendant The Ontario Court of Appeal allowed the appeal. Practice - Topic 6197 Judgments and orders - Setting aside ......
-
Nobosoft Corporation v. No Borders, Inc.,
...et al. (1991), 49 O.A.C. 1; 3 O.R.(3d) 278 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 3]. McNeill Electronics Ltd. v. American Sensors Electronics Inc. (1998), 15 O.T.C. 20; 5 C.P.C.(4th) 266 (Gen. Div.), revd. 108 O.A.C. 257 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Jonathan L. Rosenstein, for the appellants; Edward L. D'Agos......
-
McNeill Electronics Ltd. v. American Sensors Electronics Inc., (1998) 58 O.T.C. 305 (GD)
...Summary: McNeill Electronics Ltd. sued American Sensors Electronics Inc. (ASEI). ASEI was noted in default. In a decision reported [1996] 15 O.T.C. 20, a motion to set aside the noting in default was dismissed and McNeill obtained default judgment. In a decision not reported in this series ......
-
McNeill Electronics Ltd. v. American Sensors Electronics Inc., (1998) 108 O.A.C. 257 (CA)
...in default. The defendant applied to set aside the noting in default. The Ontario Court (General Division), in a decision reported at 15 O.T.C. 20, dismissed the motion. The defendant The Ontario Court of Appeal allowed the appeal. Practice - Topic 6197 Judgments and orders - Setting aside ......