McPhail v. Ross
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | Adair |
| Citation | 2019 BCSC 21 |
| Date | 09 January 2019 |
| Docket Number | S149600 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
18 practice notes
-
Klose v. Chybisov
...damages of $32,500 was appropriate based upon Kaur v. Tse, 2020 BCSC 1072; Nagaria v. Dhaliwal, 2018 BCSC 569; McPhail v. Ross, 2019 BCSC 21; and Carter v. Zhan, 2012 BCSC 595. [119] In all the circumstances, I find that an award of $90,000 is appropriate in this case. I find the cases prov......
-
Carleton v. Warner
...Pandher, 2017 BCSC 1732, non-pecuniary loss of $70,000. [130] The defence should relies upon the following authorities: McPhail v. Ross, 2019 BCSC 21, non-pecuniary loss of Tisalona v. Easton, 2015 BCSC 565, non-pecuniary loss of $32,000; McKay v. Raiwal, 2015 BCSC 220, non-pecuniary loss o......
-
Healey v. Mault
...The flaw in her reporting is a matter of reliability, not credibility. [103]     As stated in McPhail v. Ross, 2019 BCSC 21 at para.101, “I am not obliged to reject all of a witness’s evidence simply because I have concluded the witness is not credible or r......
-
Sweeney v. Yu
...complaints and a reason to treat her evidence about those with caution. [136]     As stated in McPhail v. Ross, 2019 BCSC 21 at para. 101, “I am not obliged to reject all of a witness’s evidence simply because I have concluded the witness is not credible or......
Get Started for Free
13 cases
-
Klose v. Chybisov
...damages of $32,500 was appropriate based upon Kaur v. Tse, 2020 BCSC 1072; Nagaria v. Dhaliwal, 2018 BCSC 569; McPhail v. Ross, 2019 BCSC 21; and Carter v. Zhan, 2012 BCSC 595. [119] In all the circumstances, I find that an award of $90,000 is appropriate in this case. I find the cases prov......
-
Simpson v. Eedens
...example, I will cite Sweeney v. Yu, 2021 BCSC 2133, specifically at para. 136: [136]    As stated in McPhail v. Ross, 2019 BCSC 21 at para. 101, “I am not obliged to reject all of a witness’s evidence simply because I have concluded the witness is not ......
-
Carleton v. Warner
...Pandher, 2017 BCSC 1732, non-pecuniary loss of $70,000. [130] The defence should relies upon the following authorities: McPhail v. Ross, 2019 BCSC 21, non-pecuniary loss of Tisalona v. Easton, 2015 BCSC 565, non-pecuniary loss of $32,000; McKay v. Raiwal, 2015 BCSC 220, non-pecuniary loss o......
-
Sweeney v. Yu
...complaints and a reason to treat her evidence about those with caution. [136]     As stated in McPhail v. Ross, 2019 BCSC 21 at para. 101, “I am not obliged to reject all of a witness’s evidence simply because I have concluded the witness is not credible or......
Get Started for Free