McWilliam v. Alberta (Director of SafeRoads)

JurisdictionAlberta
CourtCourt of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Citation2024 ABKB 559
Docket Number2201 08678
Date24 September 2024

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 practice notes
  • Kanzasha v. Alberta (Director of SafeRoads)
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 15, 2025
    ...a review, including to understand the basis for issuing the NAP: SAR section 2(h); McWilliam v Alberta (Director of SafeRoads), 2024 ABKB 559 at para 36; Brar v Alberta (Director of SafeRoads), 2024 ABKB 408 at para 20; Leeuwenburgh v Director of SafeRoads Alberta (20 ......
  • McWilliam v Alberta (Director of SafeRoads)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • May 11, 2026
    ...from the Judgment by The Honourable Justice M.A. Marion Dated the 23rd day of September, 2024 Filed on the 9th day of March, 2026 ( 2024 ABKB 559, Docket: 2201-08678) Appearances: B. Miller, KC for the E.C. Maher for the Respondent Memorandum of Judgment The Court: Overview 1 In May 2022 th......
5 cases
  • Beniuk v. Alberta (Director of SafeRoads)
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 25, 2024
    ...27; Lelievre at para 33; Woodworth at paras 32-34; Fish at para 150; Kolner at paras 72-73; McWilliam v Alberta (Director of SafeRoads), 2024 ABKB 559 at paras 150-163. However, given adjudicators’ absence of Charter jurisdiction, this does not mean adjudicators always or necessarily act un......
  • Kanzasha v. Alberta (Director of SafeRoads)
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 15, 2025
    ...in a review, including to understand the basis for issuing the NAP: SAR section 2(h); McWilliam v Alberta (Director of SafeRoads), 2024 ABKB 559 at para 36; Brar v Alberta (Director of SafeRoads), 2024 ABKB 408 at para 20; Leeuwenburgh v Director of SafeRoads Alberta (20 November 2023), L......
  • Stuhldreier v. Alberta (Director of SafeRoads)
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 22, 2025
    ...refused to comply: Mierke v Alberta (Director of SafeRoads), 2021 ABQB 1003 at paras 68-72; McWilliam v Alberta (Director of SafeRoads), 2024 ABKB 559 at para 53, Fish v Alberta (Director of SafeRoads), 2024 ABKB 213 at paras 97-104. Further, a recipient may not frustrate the purposes of th......
  • Sidhu v. Alberta (Director of SafeRoads)
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 26, 2025
    ...to determine the weight to give any documents, records, representations, or evidence: McWilliam v Alberta (Director of SafeRoads), 2024 ABKB 559 at para 86. As with other administrative bodies, and as noted by this Court, “adjudicators have a wide discretion to weigh evidence and make credi......
  • Get Started for Free