MELNICK v. TAPP, 2018 SKQB 163

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeELSON
Citation2018 SKQB 163
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Docket NumberQBG 364 of 2017
Date25 May 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Curry v Athabasca Resources Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 30 Septiembre 2022
    ...one way or the other, by summary judgment. Despite this consensus, the Court is not bound by it. As I observed in Melnick v Tapp, 2018 SKQB 163, the Court, on its own analysis, must still be satisfied of four things. These are: (1) that the Court can make the necessary findings of fact......
  • LINK v. SCHULTE and SCHULTE, 2019 SKQB 205
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 23 Agosto 2019
    ...one way or the other, by summary judgment. Despite this consensus, the Court is not bound by it. As I observed in Melnick v Tapp, 2018 SKQB 163, the Court, on its own analysis, must be satisfied of four things. These are: 1) that the Court can make the necessary findings of fact; 2) that it......
2 cases
  • Curry v Athabasca Resources Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 30 Septiembre 2022
    ...one way or the other, by summary judgment. Despite this consensus, the Court is not bound by it. As I observed in Melnick v Tapp, 2018 SKQB 163, the Court, on its own analysis, must still be satisfied of four things. These are: (1) that the Court can make the necessary findings of fact......
  • LINK v. SCHULTE and SCHULTE, 2019 SKQB 205
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 23 Agosto 2019
    ...one way or the other, by summary judgment. Despite this consensus, the Court is not bound by it. As I observed in Melnick v Tapp, 2018 SKQB 163, the Court, on its own analysis, must be satisfied of four things. These are: 1) that the Court can make the necessary findings of fact; 2) that it......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT