Mental Health and Addiction Services v S.B.

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
JudgeRyan-Froslie, Schwann and Leurer JJ.A.
Neutral Citation2021 SKCA 18
Citation2021 SKCA 18
Date01 February 2021
Docket NumberCACV3519

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 practice notes
  • Sunray Manufacturing Inc. v Alberta
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 8, 2024
    ...a person has a “right to be heard” and includes the right “to respond to the issues raised”: Mental Health and Addiction Services v SB, 2021 SKCA 18 at para 72. Sunray argues • Mr. Roberts was subjected to aggressive and argumentative questioning by one Board member which at times amounted ......
  • C.H. v S.F.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • February 10, 2021
    ...Turbo Resources Ltd. v Gibson (1987), 60 Sask R 221 (CA), and was most recently summarized in Mental Health and Addiction Services v S.B., 2021 SKCA 18. These cases, together with R v Palmer, [1980] 1 SCR 759 [Palmer], refer to four factors that bear on whether such evidence should be admit......
  • Ewanchuk v Oksana Community Correctional Centre
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • July 28, 2021
    ...have the potential, when taken with the other evidence adduced, to have affected the result … . Further as stated in S.B. [2021 SKCA 18] at paragraph 8, “it must not violate the principle of public policy that favours finality to litigation”. [28]   &#xA0......
  • THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK v. JANZEN
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • February 5, 2021
    ...legislation and its history and evolution will be reviewed below. [33] The Court of Appeal in Mental Health and Addiction Services v S.B., 2021 SKCA 18 at para 26, summarized the modern approach to statutory [26] In Rizzo and Rizzo Shoes Ltd. (Re), [1998] 1 SCR 27, the Supreme Court of Cana......
3 cases
  • C.H. v S.F.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • February 10, 2021
    ...Turbo Resources Ltd. v Gibson (1987), 60 Sask R 221 (CA), and was most recently summarized in Mental Health and Addiction Services v S.B., 2021 SKCA 18. These cases, together with R v Palmer, [1980] 1 SCR 759 [Palmer], refer to four factors that bear on whether such evidence should be admit......
  • THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK v. JANZEN
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • February 5, 2021
    ...legislation and its history and evolution will be reviewed below. [33] The Court of Appeal in Mental Health and Addiction Services v S.B., 2021 SKCA 18 at para 26, summarized the modern approach to statutory [26] In Rizzo and Rizzo Shoes Ltd. (Re), [1998] 1 SCR 27, the Supreme Court of Cana......
  • Ewanchuk v Oksana Community Correctional Centre
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • July 28, 2021
    ...have the potential, when taken with the other evidence adduced, to have affected the result … . Further as stated in S.B. [2021 SKCA 18] at paragraph 8, “it must not violate the principle of public policy that favours finality to litigation”. [28]   &#xA0......