Mercedes-Benz Financial Services Canada Corp. v. Zhang, [2015] O.A.C. Uned. 175
Judge | Edwards, J. |
Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
Case Date | February 13, 2015 |
Jurisdiction | Ontario |
Citations | [2015] O.A.C. Uned. 175;[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 175 (DC);2015 ONSC 986 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Tzaferis v. Multicast Networks Holdings Inc. et al., [2015] O.A.C. Uned. 830 (DC)
...a trial judge an appellant must demonstrate that there is a palpable and overriding error in order to succeed. [ Mercedes-Benz v. Zang , 2015 ONSC 986 (Div. Ct.); Housen v. Nikolaisen , 2002 SCC 33] Conclusion [9] I find no basis upon which to grant this appeal. [10] With respect to the fin......
-
Persaud v. Ramawad,
...the representation was made must have acted upon it to his or her detriment. See Mercedes-Benz Financial Services Canada Corp. v. Zhang, 2015 ONSC 986 (Div. Ct.) at para. [91] The Ramawads did not enforce the Corkery J. Order in accordance with its ......
2 cases
-
Tzaferis v. Multicast Networks Holdings Inc. et al., [2015] O.A.C. Uned. 830 (DC)
...a trial judge an appellant must demonstrate that there is a palpable and overriding error in order to succeed. [ Mercedes-Benz v. Zang , 2015 ONSC 986 (Div. Ct.); Housen v. Nikolaisen , 2002 SCC 33] Conclusion [9] I find no basis upon which to grant this appeal. [10] With respect to the fin......
-
Persaud v. Ramawad,
...the representation was made must have acted upon it to his or her detriment. See Mercedes-Benz Financial Services Canada Corp. v. Zhang, 2015 ONSC 986 (Div. Ct.) at para. [91] The Ramawads did not enforce the Corkery J. Order in accordance with its ......