Micolta v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 56
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Noël, J. |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE,PRACTICE,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW |
| Citation | [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 56,[2015] F.T.R. Uned. 56 (FC),2015 FC 183 |
| Date | 13 February 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Hoo v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) et al., 2016 FC 283
...on an undated self-serving note to which the PRRA Officer gave little or no weight ( Micolta v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) , 2015 FC 183 at para 13). [14] The Respondents also submit that the determinative issue is state protection and that the Applicant failed to provide clear and......
-
Mudiyanselage v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 749
...v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 1299 at para 14; Micolta v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 183 at para 13; Zmari v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 132 at para 13). V. Relevant Provisions [12] The relevant provis......
-
B147 v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 843
...FC 749 at para 11; Zmari v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 132 at para 13; Micolta v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 183 at para 13). In other cases, the reasonableness standard has been applied on the basis that the decision involves a question of mixed fact and......
-
Navaratnam v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 99 (FC)
...of mixed fact and law and should be reviewed on the reasonableness standard: Micolta v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2015 FC 183 at para 13. In Dunsmuir at para 47, the Supreme Court of Canada explained what is required of a court reviewing on the reasonableness standar......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
Hoo v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) et al., 2016 FC 283
...on an undated self-serving note to which the PRRA Officer gave little or no weight ( Micolta v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) , 2015 FC 183 at para 13). [14] The Respondents also submit that the determinative issue is state protection and that the Applicant failed to provide clear and......
-
Mudiyanselage v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 749
...v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 1299 at para 14; Micolta v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 183 at para 13; Zmari v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 132 at para 13). V. Relevant Provisions [12] The relevant provis......
-
B147 v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 843
...FC 749 at para 11; Zmari v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 132 at para 13; Micolta v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 183 at para 13). In other cases, the reasonableness standard has been applied on the basis that the decision involves a question of mixed fact and......
-
Navaratnam v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 99 (FC)
...of mixed fact and law and should be reviewed on the reasonableness standard: Micolta v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2015 FC 183 at para 13. In Dunsmuir at para 47, the Supreme Court of Canada explained what is required of a court reviewing on the reasonableness standar......
Request a trial to view additional results