Minegoziibe Anishinabe First Nation v. Canada
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2025 FC 925 |
| Docket Number | T-199-24 |
| Date | 22 May 2025 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
Lac La Ronge v. AG Canada
...This same point was recently reiterated in Nepinak v Canada, 2025 FC 925 [Nepinak], where Zinn J. made the following 66 Having weighed the submissions, I conclude that judicial economy favours a representative proceeding. Treaty interpretation demands consistency and uniformity. ......
-
Nelson v. Canada (Attorney General)
...interpretation of these treaty rights will be binding in perpetuity”; g) Chief Derek Nepinak and Chief Bonny Lynn Acoose v. Canada, 2025 FC 925[2], where the court considered a claim relative to annuity payments pursuant to two treaties in Ontario. The court stated at paragraph 50 that: “In......
-
Brokenhead Ojibway Nation v. Nelson
...26 [Behn]; Ontario (Attorney General) v Restoule, 2024 SCC 27 [Restoule]; and Chief Derek Nepinak and Chief Bonny Lynn Acoose v Canada, 2025 FC 925 [Nepinak], appeal as of right to the [11] In he......
3 cases
-
Lac La Ronge v. AG Canada
...This same point was recently reiterated in Nepinak v Canada, 2025 FC 925 [Nepinak], where Zinn J. made the following 66 Having weighed the submissions, I conclude that judicial economy favours a representative proceeding. Treaty interpretation demands consistency and uniformity. ......
-
Nelson v. Canada (Attorney General)
...interpretation of these treaty rights will be binding in perpetuity”; g) Chief Derek Nepinak and Chief Bonny Lynn Acoose v. Canada, 2025 FC 925[2], where the court considered a claim relative to annuity payments pursuant to two treaties in Ontario. The court stated at paragraph 50 that: “In......
-
Brokenhead Ojibway Nation v. Nelson
...26 [Behn]; Ontario (Attorney General) v Restoule, 2024 SCC 27 [Restoule]; and Chief Derek Nepinak and Chief Bonny Lynn Acoose v Canada, 2025 FC 925 [Nepinak], appeal as of right to the [11] In he......
