Mitchell v. R., 2020 NBCA 34
Jurisdiction | New Brunswick |
Judge | The Honourable Chief Justice Richard,The Honourable Justice Green,The Honourable Justice French |
Citation | 2020 NBCA 34 |
Court | Court of Appeal (New Brunswick) |
Date | 28 May 2020 |
Docket Number | 44-18-CA |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Figg v. R,
...“must not finely parse the trial judge’s reasons in a search for error” (para. 69). As pointed out in Mitchell v. R., 2020 NBCA 34, [2020] N.B.J. No. 98 (QL), courts of appeal are neither allowed to retry a criminal case nor substitute their assessment of credibility or......
-
Eatmon v. R.,
...of appeal as to whether the trial judge subjected the evidence to the reasonable doubt standard raises a question of law (Mitchell v. R., 2020 NBCA 34, [2020] N.B.J. No. 98 (QL)) for which leave is not required (s. 675(1)(a)(ii) of the Criminal Code) and which is reviewable on the standard ......
-
Martin Aubin v. Her Majesty the Queen,
...The New Brunswick Court of Appeal succinctly laid out the analysis a trial judge must follow in such an exercise in Mitchell v. R., 2020 NBCA 34 (CanLII) where they explained the framework at paragraph 3 as [3] The verdict under appeal was the culmi......
-
Ronald Sharpe c. Sa Majeste la Reine,
...son évaluation de la preuve. Ainsi que l’a affirmé la Cour d’appel dans l’arrêt Mitchell c. R., 2020 NBCA 34 (CanLII) Les tribunaux d’appel ne sont pas habilités à juger de nouveau une affaire en matière criminelle. Ils n......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Figg v. R,
...“must not finely parse the trial judge’s reasons in a search for error” (para. 69). As pointed out in Mitchell v. R., 2020 NBCA 34, [2020] N.B.J. No. 98 (QL), courts of appeal are neither allowed to retry a criminal case nor substitute their assessment of credibility or......
-
Eatmon v. R.,
...of appeal as to whether the trial judge subjected the evidence to the reasonable doubt standard raises a question of law (Mitchell v. R., 2020 NBCA 34, [2020] N.B.J. No. 98 (QL)) for which leave is not required (s. 675(1)(a)(ii) of the Criminal Code) and which is reviewable on the standard ......
-
Martin Aubin v. Her Majesty the Queen,
...The New Brunswick Court of Appeal succinctly laid out the analysis a trial judge must follow in such an exercise in Mitchell v. R., 2020 NBCA 34 (CanLII) where they explained the framework at paragraph 3 as [3] The verdict under appeal was the culmi......
-
Ronald Sharpe c. Sa Majeste la Reine,
...son évaluation de la preuve. Ainsi que l’a affirmé la Cour d’appel dans l’arrêt Mitchell c. R., 2020 NBCA 34 (CanLII) Les tribunaux d’appel ne sont pas habilités à juger de nouveau une affaire en matière criminelle. Ils n......
Request a trial to view additional results