Mohr v Strathcona, 2018 ABCA 441
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Judge | Thomas W. Wakeling |
| Citation | 2018 ABCA 441 |
| Date | 21 December 2018 |
| Docket Number | 1803-0175-AC |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board),
...Reasonable chance of success has been described as “modest and relatively easy to meet”: Mohr v Strathcona (County), 2018 ABCA 441 at para 38. As stated in Legacy Inc v Red Deer (City), 2018 ABCA 393 at para 64, “[t]he applicant must simply demonstrate that a ground of ......
-
Mohr v Strathcona (County), 2020 ABCA 187
...‘[t]he facility is consistent with the County’s Municipal Development Plan’?” (Mohr v Strathcona (County), 2018 ABCA 441 at para [3] To answer that question, it is necessary to address whether the propos......
2 cases
-
Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board),
...Reasonable chance of success has been described as “modest and relatively easy to meet”: Mohr v Strathcona (County), 2018 ABCA 441 at para 38. As stated in Legacy Inc v Red Deer (City), 2018 ABCA 393 at para 64, “[t]he applicant must simply demonstrate that a ground of ......
-
Mohr v Strathcona (County), 2020 ABCA 187
...‘[t]he facility is consistent with the County’s Municipal Development Plan’?” (Mohr v Strathcona (County), 2018 ABCA 441 at para [3] To answer that question, it is necessary to address whether the propos......