Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Canada | +1 (343) 700 0450

Mohr v Strathcona, 2018 ABCA 441

Judgment Cited authorities 37 Cited in 5 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JudgeThomas W. Wakeling
Docket Number1803-0175-AC
Date21 December 2018
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 20, 2022
    ...Reasonable chance of success has been described as “modest and relatively easy to meet”: Mohr v Strathcona (County), 2018 ABCA 441 at para 38. As stated in Legacy Inc v Red Deer (City), 2018 ABCA 393 at para 64, “[t]he applicant must simply demonstrate that a ground of ......
  • Clarity Development Advisory v Edmonton (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 28, 2023
    ...v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2022 ABCA 299 at para 15, [2022] AJ No 1117 (QL); Mohr v Strathcona (County), 2018 ABCA 441, at para 38, 82 Alta LR (6th) 29 I am satisfied on the record that is before me that the applicant's appeal is not frivolous. 30 For all of ......
  • 2023 ABCA 68,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2022 ABCA 299 at para 15, [2022] AJ No 1117 (QL); Mohr v Strathcona (County), 2018 ABCA 441, at para 38, 82 Alta LR (6th) 29 I am satisfied on the record that is before me that the applicant's appeal is not frivolous. 30 For all of ......
  • Clarity Development Advisory v Edmonton (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 28, 2023
    ...v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2022 ABCA 299 at para 15, [2022] AJ No 1117 (QL); Mohr v Strathcona (County), 2018 ABCA 441, at para 38, 82 Alta LR (6th) [29]           I am satisfied on the record that is before me tha......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 20, 2022
    ...Reasonable chance of success has been described as “modest and relatively easy to meet”: Mohr v Strathcona (County), 2018 ABCA 441 at para 38. As stated in Legacy Inc v Red Deer (City), 2018 ABCA 393 at para 64, “[t]he applicant must simply demonstrate that a ground of ......
  • Clarity Development Advisory v Edmonton (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 28, 2023
    ...v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2022 ABCA 299 at para 15, [2022] AJ No 1117 (QL); Mohr v Strathcona (County), 2018 ABCA 441, at para 38, 82 Alta LR (6th) 29 I am satisfied on the record that is before me that the applicant's appeal is not frivolous. 30 For all of ......
  • Mohr v Strathcona (County), 2020 ABCA 187
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • May 6, 2020
    ...‘[t]he facility is consistent with the County’s Municipal Development Plan’?” (Mohr v Strathcona (County), 2018 ABCA 441 at para [3]           To answer that question, it is necessary to address whether the propos......
  • 2023 ABCA 68,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2022 ABCA 299 at para 15, [2022] AJ No 1117 (QL); Mohr v Strathcona (County), 2018 ABCA 441, at para 38, 82 Alta LR (6th) 29 I am satisfied on the record that is before me that the applicant's appeal is not frivolous. 30 For all of ......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT