Moncur v. Plante

JurisdictionOntario
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
JudgeFairburn A.C.J.O., Harvison Young and Jamal JJ.A.
Neutral Citation2021 ONCA 462
Citation2021 ONCA 462
Date25 June 2021
Docket NumberC68511

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
29 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 19 ' 23, 2026)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 27, 2026
    ...Family Law Rules, O. Reg. 114/99, rr. 2(2), 2(3), 20(5), 31, Reyes v. Rollo (2001), 24 R.F.L. (5th) 120 (Ont. S.C.), Moncur v. Plante, 2021 ONCA 462, 57 R.F.L. (8th) 293, Boily v. Carleton Condominium Corporation 145, 2014 ONCA 574, Mohr v. Sweeney, 2016 ONSC 3238, Castillo v. Xela Enterpri......
  • Chapter 10: Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law (Tenth Edition)
    • April 14, 2025
    ...v Bernardin, 2020 BCSC 807. And see JLZ v CMZ, 2021 ABCA 200. 449 JLZ v CMZ, 2021 ABCA 200 at para 62; see also Moncur v Plante, 2021 ONCA 462. 450 AA v SNA, 2007 BCCA 363 at para 26; YHP v JN, 2023 ONSC 5766 (interim variation of final 451 Stakenvicius v Coates, 2020 ONSC 3966; Gostautaite......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • November 18, 2023
    ...Alberta, 2022 ABCA 35, leave to appeal to SCC dismissed, 2022 CanLII 26236 ......................................... 46 Moncur v Plante, 2021 ONCA 462 .....................................................................604 Montres Rolex SA v Balshin (1992), [1993] 1 FC 236, 147 NR 297, 45 ......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law (Tenth Edition)
    • April 14, 2025
    ...Molodowich v Penttinen (1980), 17 RFL (2d) 376 (Ont Dist Ct) 36, 37, 610 Monahan-Joudrey v Joudrey, 2012 ONSC 5984 419 Moncur v Plante, 2021 ONCA 462 532 Money v Money (1987), 5 RFL (3d) 375 (Man CA) Monga v Monga, 2023 ONSC 1169 283 Monilaws v Monilaws, 2022 ABKB 652 196, 249 Moniz v Moniz......
  • Get Started for Free
23 cases
  • Rosenthal v Rosenthal
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • July 31, 2025
    ...2 S.C.R. 1065, at p. 1078 and TG Industries Ltd. v. Williams, 2001 NSCA 105, 196 N.S.R. (2d) 35, at para. 32. Also, see Moncur v. Plante, 2021 ONCA 462, at para. 10; Sutherland Estate v. Murphy, 2025 ONCA 227, at paras. 46 and 47; Hefkey v. Hefkey, 2013 ONCA 44, at para. 3. 4 Bell Canada v.......
  • Rosenthal v Rosenthal
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 3, 2025
    ...Also, Greenberg v. Nowack, 2016 ONCA 949, 135 O.R. (3d) 525, at para. 25; Chong v. Donnelly, 2019 ONCA 799, at para. 5; Moncur v. Plante, 2021 ONCA 462, at para. 18 Carey, at para. 32; Greenberg, at para. 26; Sutherland Estate, at para. 43. 19 North Elgin, at para. 45, relying on Carey, at ......
  • TC v MH
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 19, 2024
    ...SCC 17, at para 38; confirmed in JLZ v CMZ 2021 ABCA 200, at para 34. 82 The Ontario Court of Appeal, in the case of Moncur v Plante, 2021 ONCA 462, expressed the test this way at para 10: For a party to be found in contempt of court for breaching a court order, three elements must be prove......
  • Carter v Carter
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • October 1, 2024
    ...onus to prove contempt beyond a reasonable doubt: see Einstoss v. Starkman, 200 CanLii 2777 (Ont. S.C.J.) ¶ 10. 428 In Moncur v. Plante, 2021 ONCA 462, the Ontario Court of Appeal set out the following general principles that govern the use of the Court's power to find a party in civil cont......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 19 ' 23, 2026)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 27, 2026
    ...Family Law Rules, O. Reg. 114/99, rr. 2(2), 2(3), 20(5), 31, Reyes v. Rollo (2001), 24 R.F.L. (5th) 120 (Ont. S.C.), Moncur v. Plante, 2021 ONCA 462, 57 R.F.L. (8th) 293, Boily v. Carleton Condominium Corporation 145, 2014 ONCA 574, Mohr v. Sweeney, 2016 ONSC 3238, Castillo v. Xela Enterpri......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 29 ' October 3, 2025)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 7, 2025
    ...Canada, 2020 ONCA 142, Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership v. Corkery, 2009 ONCA 85, Chong v. Donnelly, 2019 ONCA 799, Moncur v. Plante, 2021 ONCA 462, Schafer v. Schafer, 2025 ABCA 99, Miner v. Cooke, 2025 ABCA 226, Sweda Farms Ltd. v. Ontario Egg Producers, 2011 ONSC 3650, Culligan Canada ......
4 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 10: Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law (Tenth Edition)
    • April 14, 2025
    ...v Bernardin, 2020 BCSC 807. And see JLZ v CMZ, 2021 ABCA 200. 449 JLZ v CMZ, 2021 ABCA 200 at para 62; see also Moncur v Plante, 2021 ONCA 462. 450 AA v SNA, 2007 BCCA 363 at para 26; YHP v JN, 2023 ONSC 5766 (interim variation of final 451 Stakenvicius v Coates, 2020 ONSC 3966; Gostautaite......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • November 18, 2023
    ...Alberta, 2022 ABCA 35, leave to appeal to SCC dismissed, 2022 CanLII 26236 ......................................... 46 Moncur v Plante, 2021 ONCA 462 .....................................................................604 Montres Rolex SA v Balshin (1992), [1993] 1 FC 236, 147 NR 297, 45 ......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law (Tenth Edition)
    • April 14, 2025
    ...Molodowich v Penttinen (1980), 17 RFL (2d) 376 (Ont Dist Ct) 36, 37, 610 Monahan-Joudrey v Joudrey, 2012 ONSC 5984 419 Moncur v Plante, 2021 ONCA 462 532 Money v Money (1987), 5 RFL (3d) 375 (Man CA) Monga v Monga, 2023 ONSC 1169 283 Monilaws v Monilaws, 2022 ABKB 652 196, 249 Moniz v Moniz......
  • Enforcement of Equitable Court Orders
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • November 18, 2023
    ...36–37. 5 Ibid at para 36; College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia v Ezzati , 2021 BCCA 422 at para 59. 6 Moncur v Plante , 2021 ONCA 462 at paras 19–20; Chong v Donnelly , 2019 ONCA 799 at paras 9–10; Squires v Smith , 2019 NLCA 54 at paras 19–21. 7 See Apotex Fermentation In......