Monsanto v. Canada (Health), 2020 FC 1053
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 FC 1053 |
| Date | 12 November 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Naoum v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 1463
...across the country as they were in full force and effect (see for example, challenging federal measures: Monsanto v Canada (Health), 2020 FC 1053, Spencer v Canada (Health), 2021 FC 621, Canadian Constitution Foundation v Attorney General of Canada, 2021 ONSC 4744, Turmel v Canada 2021 FC 1......
-
Spencer v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 361
...three elements of the test are cumulative, but strength in one factor may overcome weakness on another (see Monsanto v Canada (Health), 2020 FC 1053 at para 50 [Monsanto]). It is important to remember that an interlocutory injunction is equitable relief, and a degree of flexibility must be ......
-
Skibsted v. Canada (Environment and Climate Change), 2021 FC 301
...of the test are cumulative, but strength in one factor may overcome weakness on another (see the discussion in Monsanto v Canada (Health), 2020 FC 1053 at para 50 [Monsanto]). At the end of the day, it is important to remember that an interlocutory injunction is equitable relief, and a degr......
-
Ebid v. Immigration Consultants of Canada Regulatory Council,
...satisfy each of the three elements of the test, but strength on one aspect may overcome weakness on another (Monsanto v Canada (Health), 2020 FC 1053 at para 50). [13] It is important to remember that an interlocutory injunction is equitable relief, and a degree of flexibility must be prese......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
Naoum v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 1463
...across the country as they were in full force and effect (see for example, challenging federal measures: Monsanto v Canada (Health), 2020 FC 1053, Spencer v Canada (Health), 2021 FC 621, Canadian Constitution Foundation v Attorney General of Canada, 2021 ONSC 4744, Turmel v Canada 2021 FC 1......
-
Spencer v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 361
...three elements of the test are cumulative, but strength in one factor may overcome weakness on another (see Monsanto v Canada (Health), 2020 FC 1053 at para 50 [Monsanto]). It is important to remember that an interlocutory injunction is equitable relief, and a degree of flexibility must be ......
-
Skibsted v. Canada (Environment and Climate Change), 2021 FC 301
...of the test are cumulative, but strength in one factor may overcome weakness on another (see the discussion in Monsanto v Canada (Health), 2020 FC 1053 at para 50 [Monsanto]). At the end of the day, it is important to remember that an interlocutory injunction is equitable relief, and a degr......
-
Lavergne-Poitras v. Canada (Attorney General),
...supplier personnel that they pose little risk of transmission. As Justice Little of this Court stated in Monsanto v Canada (Health), 2020 FC 1053 at paragraph 113: […] the harm to the public interest is not to be measured principally in this case by assessing the extent of the risk that the......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Federal Court Weighs In On Mandatory Quarantine Upon Re-entering Canada
...wish to thank Stefanie Thibert, articling student, for her help in preparing this legal update. Footnotes 1 Monsanto v Canada (Health), 2020 FC 1053 2 Minimizing the Risk of Exposure to COVID-19 in Canada Order (Mandatory Isolation), No. 7, PC 2020-0840. 3 Quarantine Act, SC 2005, c 20. 4 R......