Montreal Trust Co. of Canada et al. v. ScotiaMcLeod Inc. et al.,

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeFinlayson, Galligan and Doherty, JJ.A.
Citation(1995), 87 O.A.C. 129 (CA),1995 CanLII 1301 (NS CA),1995 CanLII 1301 (ON CA),26 OR (3d) 481,129 DLR (4th) 711,23 BLR (2d) 165,[1995] CarswellOnt 1203,[1995] OJ No 3556 (QL),59 ACWS (3d) 213,87 OAC 129
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Date30 October 1995

Montreal Trust v. ScotiaMcLeod (1995), 87 O.A.C. 129 (CA)

MLB headnote and full text

ScotiaMcLeod Inc. and William Wood (defendants/appellants) v. Peoples Jewellers Limited, Irving R. Gerstein, Charles F. Gill, Bertrand Gerstein, Marvin Gerstein, James M. Gillies, Nicholas I. White, Howard P. Berkowitz, Anna M. Porter, Michael G. Shulman, Leighton W. McCarthy, and Henry N.R. Jackman (third parties/respondents in appeal)

(C198151)

Indexed As: Montreal Trust Co. of Canada et al. v. ScotiaMcLeod Inc. et al.

Ontario Court of Appeal

Finlayson, Galligan and Doherty, JJ.A.

November 22, 1995.

Summary:

The plaintiffs purchased issued senior unsecured debentures of Peoples Jewellers. The plaintiffs subsequently sued, inter alia, ScotiaMcLeod (a firm of underwriters) and its president, alleging an intentional or neg­ligent material misrepresentation because it was not disclosed to the plaintiffs that, at the time of the purchase, Peoples was conditionally liable for certain obligations of two other companies. The defendants com­menced third party proceedings against the directors of Peoples, claiming contribution and indemnity. The defendants did not allege negligence by the directors, except by the directors Charles Gill and Irving Gerstein, who were also the vice president and the president and chief executive officer of Peoples. The defendants claimed against Gill and Gerstein for contribution and indemnity and for negligent misrepresentation. The third parties' motion to dismiss the defen­dants' amended third party claim was granted on the basis that it failed to disclose a rea­son­able cause of action. The defendants appealed.

The Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal with respect to all of the third parties except Charles Gill and Irving Gerstein. The appeal was allowed with respect to Charles Gill and Irving Gerstein.

Company Law - Topic 4181

Directors - Liability of directors - General - The plaintiffs purchased issued senior unsecured debentures of Peoples Jewellers - The plaintiffs subsequently sued ScotiaMcLeod (a firm of underwriters) and its president, alleging an intentional or negli­gent material misrepresentation because it was not disclosed to the plaintiffs that, at the time of the purchase, Peoples was conditionally liable for certain obligations of two other companies - The defendants commenced third party proceedings against the directors of Peoples - The defendants relied on s. 130(1)(c) of the Securities Act as imposing liability on every director of an issuer of a prospectus - The Ontario Court of Appeal held that s. 130(1) had no application to the purchasers of debentures which were the subject of a private place­ment - See paragraphs 33 and 34.

Company Law - Topic 4183

Directors - Liability of directors - For torts - The plaintiffs purchased issued senior unsecured debentures of Peoples Jewellers - The plaintiffs subsequently sued ScotiaMcLeod (a firm of under­writ­ers) and its president, alleging an inten­tional or negligent material misrepre­senta­tion because it was not disclosed to the plaintiffs that, at the time of the pur­chase, Peoples was conditionally liable for certain obligations of two other companies - The defendants commenced third party pro­ceedings against the directors of Peoples, claiming contribution and indem­nity - The defendants did not allege negli­gence by the directors, except by the dir­ectors Gill and Gerstein, who were also the vice president and the president and chief executive officer of Peoples, and against whom the defendants also claimed for negligent misrepresentation - The Ontario Court of Appeal affirmed a dismissal of the third party claim against all of the directors except Gill and Gerstein.

Practice - Topic 1121

Parties - Third party procedure - When available - Claim for contribution or in­demnity - [See Company Law - Topic 4183].

Cases Noticed:

Queen (D.J.) v. Cognos Inc., [1993] 1 S.C.R. 87; 147 N.R. 169; 60 O.A.C. 1, consd. [para. 20].

London Drugs Ltd. v. Brassart and Vanwinkel, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 299; 143 N.R. 1; 18 B.C.A.C. 1; 31 W.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 23].

London Drugs v. Kuehne & Nagel - see London Drugs Ltd. v. Brassart and Van­winkel.

Ontario Store Fixtures Inc. v. Mmmuffins Inc. (1989), 70 O.R.(2d) 42 (H.C.), refd to. [para. 25].

Lennard's Carrying Co. v. Asiatic Petro­leum Co., [1915] A.C. 705 (H.L.), consd. [para. 28].

Tesco Supermarkets Ltd. v. Nattrass, [1972] A.C. 153 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 29].

British Thomson-Houston Co. v. Sterling Accessories Ltd., [1924] 2 Ch. 33, refd to. [para. 30].

R. v. Canadian Dredge & Dock Co. et al., [1985] 1 S.C.R. 662; 59 N.R. 241; 9 O.A.C. 321, consd. [para. 31].

Mentmore Manufacturing Co. et al. v. National Merchandise Manufacturing Co. et al. (1978), 22 N.R. 161; 89 D.L.R.(3d) 195 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. 32].

White Horse Distillers Ltd. et al. v. Gregson Associates Ltd. et al., [1984] R.P.C. 61 (Ch. D.), refd to. [para. 32].

Belanger (R.D.) & Associates Ltd. et al. v. Stadium Corp. of Ontario Ltd. and Bitove Corp. (1991), 57 O.A.C. 81; 5 O.R.(3d) 778 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 39].

Hanson v. Bank of Nova Scotia et al. (1994), 74 O.A.C. 145; 19 O.R.(3d) 142 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 39].

Hunt v. T & N plc et al., [1990] 2 S.C.R. 959; 117 N.R. 321; 4 C.C.L.T.(2d) 1; 43 C.P.C.(2d) 105; 49 B.C.L.R.(2d) 273; 74 D.L.R.(4th) 321, refd to. [para. 39].

Statutes Noticed:

Securities Act, R.S.O 1990, c. S-5, sect. 58(1), sect. 130(1)(c) [para. 33].

Counsel:

Dennis R. O'Connor and Benjamin T. Glustein, for the appellants;

Brian G. Morgan and Jennifer Dolman, for the respondent, Charles Gill;

Robert P. Armstrong, Q.C., and Steven J. Tenai, for the respondents, James M. Gillies, Howard P. Berkowitz, Anna M. Porter, Michael G. Shulman, Leighton W. McCarthy and Henry N.R. Jackman;

Allan Sternberg, for the respondent, Nicholas I. White;

Robert J. Morris and David D. Conklin, for the respondents, Irving R. Gerstein and Bertrand Gerstein;

Kevin R. Aalto, for the respondent, Marvin Gerstein.

This appeal was heard on October 30, 1995, before Finlayson, Galligan and Doherty, JJ.A., of the Ontario Court of Appeal. The following judgment of the Court of Appeal was delivered by Finlayson, J.A., and was released on November 22, 1995.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
325 practice notes
  • Fullowka et al. v. Royal Oak Ventures Inc. et al.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Northwest Territories (Canada)
    • December 16, 2004
    ...Dist. Ct.), affd. [1985] O.J. No. 630 (H.C.), refd to. [para. 622]. Montreal Trust Co. of Canada et al. v. ScotiaMcLeod Inc. et al. (1995), 87 O.A.C. 129; 26 O.R.(3d) 481 (C.A.), leave to appeal refused [1996] 3 S.C.R. viii; 205 N.R. 314; 95 O.A.C. 399, refd to. [para. ScotiaMcLeod Inc. et ......
  • Nielsen Estate et al. v. Epton et al., 2006 ABQB 21
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen''s Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 6, 2006
    ...- see Montreal Trust Co. of Canada et al. v. ScotiaMcLeod Inc. et al. Montreal Trust Co. of Canada et al. v. ScotiaMcLeod Inc. et al. (1995), 87 O.A.C. 129; 23 B.L.R.(2d) 165 ; 9 C.C.L.S. 97 ; 129 D.L.R.(4th) 711 ; 26 O.R.(3d) 481 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 15, footnote Blacklaws et al. v......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 19 ' 23, 2025)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 27, 2025
    ...(C.A.), ADGA Systems International Ltd. v. Valcom Ltd. (1999), 43 O.R. (3d) 101 (C.A.), ScotiaMcLeod Inc. v. Peoples Jewellers Ltd. (1995), 26 O.R. (3d) 481 (C.A.), Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68, Western Canadian Shopping Centres Inc. v. Dutton, 2001 SCC 46, Hodge v. Neinstein, 201......
  • COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (JANUARY 27 – 31)
    • Canada
    • LexBlog Canada
    • February 1, 2025
    ...Lewis, 2016 ONCA 903, 1417217 Ontario Inc. v. River Trail Estates Inc., 2024 ONCA 491, ScotiaMcLeod Inc. v. Peoples Jewellers Ltd. (1995), 26 O.R. (3d) 481 (C.A.), ADGA Systems International Ltd. v. Valcom Ltd. (1999), 43 O.R. (3d) 101 (C.A.), Kerr v. Baranow, 2011 SCC 10 Sigalas v Sigalas ......
  • Get Started for Free
306 cases
  • Fullowka et al. v. Royal Oak Ventures Inc. et al.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Northwest Territories (Canada)
    • December 16, 2004
    ...Dist. Ct.), affd. [1985] O.J. No. 630 (H.C.), refd to. [para. 622]. Montreal Trust Co. of Canada et al. v. ScotiaMcLeod Inc. et al. (1995), 87 O.A.C. 129; 26 O.R.(3d) 481 (C.A.), leave to appeal refused [1996] 3 S.C.R. viii; 205 N.R. 314; 95 O.A.C. 399, refd to. [para. ScotiaMcLeod Inc. et ......
  • Nielsen Estate et al. v. Epton et al., 2006 ABQB 21
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen''s Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 6, 2006
    ...- see Montreal Trust Co. of Canada et al. v. ScotiaMcLeod Inc. et al. Montreal Trust Co. of Canada et al. v. ScotiaMcLeod Inc. et al. (1995), 87 O.A.C. 129; 23 B.L.R.(2d) 165 ; 9 C.C.L.S. 97 ; 129 D.L.R.(4th) 711 ; 26 O.R.(3d) 481 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 15, footnote Blacklaws et al. v......
  • Blacklaws v. 470433 Alta. Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • March 1, 1999
    ...113 O.A.C. 375 ; 37 O.R.(3d) 97 (C.A.), refd to. [paras. 37, 135]. Montreal Trust Co. of Canada et al. v. ScotiaMcLeod Inc. et al. (1995), 87 O.A.C. 129; 26 O.R.(3d) 481 (C.A.), leave to appeal denied (1996), 205 N.R. 314 ; 95 O.A.C. 399 (S.C.C.), refd to. [paras. 37, ScotiaMcLeod v.......
  • Human Rights Commission (N.S.) v. Annapolis (County),
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • September 30, 2005
    ...Inc. et al. (1998), 111 O.A.C. 288 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 25]. Montreal Trust Co. of Canada et al. v. ScotiaMcLeod Inc. et al. (1995), 87 O.A.C. 129; 1995 CarswellOnt 1203 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 27]. RSJ Holdings Inc. v. London (City), [2004] O.T.C. Uned. 480; 2004 CarswellOnt 1910 (Sup. ......
  • Get Started for Free
10 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 19 ' 23, 2025)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 27, 2025
    ...(C.A.), ADGA Systems International Ltd. v. Valcom Ltd. (1999), 43 O.R. (3d) 101 (C.A.), ScotiaMcLeod Inc. v. Peoples Jewellers Ltd. (1995), 26 O.R. (3d) 481 (C.A.), Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68, Western Canadian Shopping Centres Inc. v. Dutton, 2001 SCC 46, Hodge v. Neinstein, 201......
  • COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (JANUARY 27 – 31)
    • Canada
    • LexBlog Canada
    • February 1, 2025
    ...Lewis, 2016 ONCA 903, 1417217 Ontario Inc. v. River Trail Estates Inc., 2024 ONCA 491, ScotiaMcLeod Inc. v. Peoples Jewellers Ltd. (1995), 26 O.R. (3d) 481 (C.A.), ADGA Systems International Ltd. v. Valcom Ltd. (1999), 43 O.R. (3d) 101 (C.A.), Kerr v. Baranow, 2011 SCC 10 Sigalas v Sigalas ......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 27 ' 31, 2025)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 6, 2025
    ...Lewis, 2016 ONCA 903, 1417217 Ontario Inc. v. River Trail Estates Inc., 2024 ONCA 491, ScotiaMcLeod Inc. v. Peoples Jewellers Ltd. (1995), 26 O.R. (3d) 481 (C.A.), ADGA Systems International Ltd. v. Valcom Ltd. (1999), 43 O.R. (3d) 101 (C.A.), Kerr v. Baranow, 2011 SCC 10 Sigalas v Sigalas ......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 29 ' December 3)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 8, 2021
    ...Canada Corporation v. Anderson, 2015 BCSC 2221, McGrail v. Phillips, 2018 ONSC 3571, ScotiaMcLeod Inc. v. Peoples Jewellers Ltd. (1995), 26 O.R. (3d) 481, Frame v. Smith, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 99, Guerin v. R., [1984] 2 S.C.R. 335, Galambos v. Perez, 2009 SCC 48, In re Harwood, 637 F (3d) 615 at ......
  • Get Started for Free
7 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Law of Partnerships and Corporations. Third Edition
    • September 8, 2009
    .......................................................... 72 Scotia Macleod Inc. v. Peoples Jewellers Inc. (1995), 26 O.R. 3d 481, 129 D.L.R. (4th) 711, 87 O.A.C. 129 (C.A.) ................................................. 390 The Law of ParTnershiPs and CorPor aTions 628 Scottish Co-operati......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Partnerships and Corporations. Fourth Edition
    • August 5, 2018
    ...CanLII 2992 (CA) ................................................. 76 Scotia Macleod Inc v Peoples Jewellers Inc (1995), 26 OR 3d 481, 129 DLR (4th) 711, 87 OAC 129 (CA) ......................................................... 429 Scottish Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd v Meyer (1958),......
  • Corporate Liability During Insolvency
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law in Canada. Cases, Materials, and Problems Part II
    • June 23, 2019
    ...diferent kind of claim than is contemplated in cases like Peoples [ Montreal Trust Co of Canada et al v Scotia McLeod Inc et al (1995), 87 O.A.C. 129]. The plaintif is not alleging that he was wronged by a director or oicers acting in his or her personal capacity, but is asserting that the ......
  • Class AMPs: withdrawing the corporate veil on judgment proofing.
    • Canada
    • University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review Vol. 72 No. 2, March - March 2014
    • March 22, 2014
    ...351 (CA), leave to appeal to SCC refused, [2000] 1 SCR xv, 51 OR (3d) xvii [ADGA]. (50) Scotia McLeod Inc v Peoples Jewellers Ltd (1995), 26 OR (3d) 481, 129 DLR (4th) 711 (Ont CA), application for leave to appeal dismissed [1996] SCCA No 40 (SCC) [Peoples (51) Janis P Sarra & Ronald B ......
  • Get Started for Free