Morasse v. Nadeau‑Dubois, 2016 SCC 44
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
Judge | McLachlin, Beverley; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Cromwell, Thomas Albert; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Wagner, Richard; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell |
Citation | 2016 SCC 44,[2016] 2 SCR 232 |
Docket Number | 36351 |
Date | 27 October 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
28 practice notes
-
McLean v. Sleigh, 2019 NSCA 71
...or the sentence is otherwise demonstrably unfit, see R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64 at paras. 11, 44; see also Morasse v. Noreau-Dubois, 2016 SCC 44 at para. 131 (per Wagner J. (as he then was), dissenting); Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair, 2019 BCCA 156 at para. 24; Business Developmen......
-
Jackson v Jackson,
...the alleged contemnor of which the contemnor has notice and which the contemnor intentionally breached); see also Morasse v Nadeau-Dubois, 2016 SCC 44 at paras 19–21, [2016] 2 SCR 232. The persuasive burden is on the party alleging contempt and that party also has the burden to adduc......
-
R. v. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, 2018 ABCA 391
...if the assertion is “public defiance” (para 63); Envacon Inc v 829693 Alberta Ltd, 2018 ABCA 313 at para 8; Morasse v Nadeau-Dubois, 2016 SCC 44 at para 21 and 81, [2016] 2 SCR 232. That is a key feature to the statutory construction analysis which follows. Under the rule of law, prosecutio......
-
Jones v Jones,
...law principles. Both Bhatnager v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1990] 2 SCR 217 at 225–226 and Morasse v Nadeau-Dubois, 2016 SCC 44 at paras 94–99, [2016] 2 SCR 232, speak of the requirement of personal service or actual knowledge of a court order as a precondition to lia......
Request a trial to view additional results
25 cases
-
McLean v. Sleigh, 2019 NSCA 71
...or the sentence is otherwise demonstrably unfit, see R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64 at paras. 11, 44; see also Morasse v. Noreau-Dubois, 2016 SCC 44 at para. 131 (per Wagner J. (as he then was), dissenting); Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair, 2019 BCCA 156 at para. 24; Business Developmen......
-
Jackson v Jackson,
...the alleged contemnor of which the contemnor has notice and which the contemnor intentionally breached); see also Morasse v Nadeau-Dubois, 2016 SCC 44 at paras 19–21, [2016] 2 SCR 232. The persuasive burden is on the party alleging contempt and that party also has the burden to adduc......
-
R. v. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, 2018 ABCA 391
...if the assertion is “public defiance” (para 63); Envacon Inc v 829693 Alberta Ltd, 2018 ABCA 313 at para 8; Morasse v Nadeau-Dubois, 2016 SCC 44 at para 21 and 81, [2016] 2 SCR 232. That is a key feature to the statutory construction analysis which follows. Under the rule of law, prosecutio......
-
Jones v Jones,
...law principles. Both Bhatnager v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1990] 2 SCR 217 at 225–226 and Morasse v Nadeau-Dubois, 2016 SCC 44 at paras 94–99, [2016] 2 SCR 232, speak of the requirement of personal service or actual knowledge of a court order as a precondition to lia......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Contempt Of Court And The Impact Of The Nadeau-Dubois Case On Labour Law
...is harming the employer? That was the issue addressed by the Supreme Court of Canada on October 27, 2016, in Morasse v. Nadeau-Dubois, 2016 SCC 44. The facts in that case date back to the student protests in response to the provincial government's plan, at the time, to increase tuition fees......