Morgan and Jacobson v Attorney General for Prince Edward Island

AuthorMargaret McCallum
Pages193-221
ナヘヌ
MorganandJacobsonvAttorneyGeneral
forPrinceEdwardIsland
MargaretMcCallum
I F    couple from FloridaMelvi n and SylviaGri n were
orderedtopaynesofclosetoforpurchasingthroughanintermedi
aryacresseventysixhectaresoflandonPrinceEdwardIslandAsnon
residents the Grins needed Cabinet approval to acquire more than ve
acresoflandormorethanfeetofshorefrontage The LandsProtectionAct
LPAwhichtheGrinsviolatedhadsurvivedaCharterchallengeinthe
Islandcourtsinthes In two earlier cases, almost a century apart, the
Supreme Court of Canada had rejected landowners’ challenges to Island
legislation limiting the exte ntof i ndividualla nd holdingsI n the rst of
theseinthenewlyestablishedSupremeCourtupheldIslandlegisla
tioncompellingresidentandnonresidentownersofmorethanacresto
sell their estates to the government.
In MorganandJacobsonvAorneyGeneralforPrinceEdwardIslandthe
Supreme Court again upheld the right of the provincial legislature to rest rict
therightofnonresidentindividualstoholdIslandland This chapter tells
the story of the Morgan case.
Histor ical Context
A   major component ofwhat ni neteenthcentury
IslandersreferredtoasthelandquestionAftertheTreatyofParis
when France transferred sovereignty over what became Prince Edward Island
MargaretMcCallum
toGreatBritaintheimperialgovernmentdividedtheIslandintosixtyseven
lotsortownshipsofaboutacreseachandallocatedallbutoneof
theseinasingledaytoaboutindividualsThegranteeswererequiredto
assumetherisksandbenetsofpopulatingtheirlotswithimmigrantsand
manychosetorentlandstoselersratherthangrantingfreeholdsForthe
next century, Islanders tried various means to persuade proprietors to con
vert leasehold grants to freeholds. Restrictions on the r ights of aliens to hold
land were part of the received law in the British North American colonies,
but these did not apply to proprietors who remained in the United Kingdom,
asmanydidInPrinceEdwardIslandmodiedtheserestrictionsset
tingaacrelimitonalienlandholdingsThecampaignagainstthepro
prietorialsystemcontinueduntilwhentheIslandbythenaCanadian
province, enacted legislation to expropriate large private land holdings. Al
thoughbytheproprietorwiththelargestholdingslivedontheIsland
those who opposed monopoly control of land often strengthened their a rgu
ments by invoking the image of absentee owners living o the labour of
Islanders.
That image continues to resonate with Islanders, and is invoked in con
temporary policy debates over how Islanders should protect their land base.
TheSpeechfromtheThroneattheopeningoftheLegislatureinforex
ample, referred to the “long, tempestuous and sometimes, passionate history
connected with our land and our people’s relationship to the land . . . the cit
izensofPrinceEdwardIslandindividuallyandthroughtheirGovernment
arepreparedtoutilizethelessonsofhistoryanddealwiththeproblemsof
land use and land ownership in a resolute and vigorous fashion.” For Isla nd
politicians, one lesson of this h istory was that voters, who would resist restric
tions on what they considered to be their rights as la ndowners, would support
dierentrulesfornonresidentsRichardAlanMorganandAlanMaxJacob
sonAmericancitizenswholivedinRochesterNewYorklearnedthatlesson
inwhentheyaemptedtopurchasethirtysixacresfourteenandahalf
hectares) of wooded land on an unpaved road in Prince County, about three
miles from Cedar Dunes Provincial Park. Sol Mednick, the registered owner,
had purchased the land t he previous year from Eleanor MacWilliams.
NonResidentLandOwnershipinthes
MMarvi n Taylor, owned Canadian Estate Land Cor
poration, which marketed vacant rural land in Canada as recreational lots.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT