Morin v. Fortin, 1951 CanLII 53 (SCC)

JudgeRinfret, Thibaudeau; Taschereau, Robert; Rand, Ivan Cleveland; Locke, Charles Holland; Fauteux, Joseph Honoré Gérald
CourtSupreme Court of Canada
Case DateDecember 03, 1951
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations1951 CanLII 53 (SCC);[1952] 1 SCR 222;1951 CanLII 51 (SCC);1951 CanLII 52 (SCC);[1952] 1 SCR 167;[1952] 1 DLR 529;1951 CanLII 59 (SCC);[1952] 1 SCR 143;52 DTC 1014;[1952] 1 SCR 123;[1952] 1 DLR 401;15 CPR 99
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
65 practice notes
  • Croplife Can. v. Toronto, (2005) 198 O.A.C. 35 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Ontario Court of Appeal
    • May 13, 2005
    ...d'arrosage) et al. v. Hudson (Town), [2001] 2 S.C.R. 241; 271 N.R. 201; 2001 SCC 40, consd. [para. 2]. Verdun (City) v. Sun Oil Co., [1952] 1 S.C.R. 222, consd. [para. Shell Canada Products Ltd. v. Vancouver (City), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 231; 163 N.R. 81; 41 B.C.A.C. 81; 66 W.A.C. 81, consd. [par......
  • R. v. Greenbaum (M.), (1993) 149 N.R. 114 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • February 25, 1993
    ...[paras. 21, 39]. Hamilton (City) v. Hamilton Distillery Co. (1907), 38 S.C.R. 239, appld. [para. 25]. Verdun (City) v. Sun Oil Co., [1952] 1 S.C.R. 222, appld. [para. McKay v. R., [1965] S.C.R. 798, appld. [para. 27]. Merritt v. Toronto (City) (1895), 22 O.A.R. 205, appld. [para. 28]. Morri......
  • Free World Trust v. Électro Santé Inc. et al., (2000) 263 N.R. 150 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • December 15, 2000
    ...26]. Beloit Canada Ltd. v. Valmet Oy (1986), 64 N.R. 287; 8 C.P.R.(3d) 289 (F.C.A.), consd. [para. 26]. R. v. Uhlemann Optical Co., [1952] 1 S.C.R. 143, refd to. [para. 27]. Domtar Ltd. v. MacMillan Bloedel Packaging Ltd. (1977), 33 C.P.R.(2d) 182 (F.C.T.D.), refd to. [para. 27]. Grip Print......
  • R. v. Greenbaum (M.), (1993) 61 O.A.C. 241 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • February 25, 1993
    ...[paras. 21, 39]. Hamilton (City) v. Hamilton Distillery Co. (1907), 38 S.C.R. 239, appld. [para. 25]. Verdun (City) v. Sun Oil Co., [1952] 1 S.C.R. 222, appld. [para. McKay v. R., [1965] S.C.R. 798, appld. [para. 27]. Merritt v. Toronto (City) (1895), 22 O.A.R. 205, appld. [para. 28]. Morri......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
65 cases
  • Apotex Inc. v. Janssen Inc., 2021 FCA 45
    • Canada
    • Federal Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • March 4, 2021
    ...Co. of Canada, Ltd. v. Western Electric Co., Inc., [1934] S.C.R. 94, [1934] 1 D.L.R. 369 at 100-101, and R. v. Uhlemann Optical Co., [1952] 1 S.C.R. 143, 15 C.P.R. 99 dealt with the question of the result of the combination as part of the anticipation analysis. [21] Janssen points out that ......
  • Croplife Can. v. Toronto, (2005) 198 O.A.C. 35 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Ontario Court of Appeal
    • May 13, 2005
    ...d'arrosage) et al. v. Hudson (Town), [2001] 2 S.C.R. 241; 271 N.R. 201; 2001 SCC 40, consd. [para. 2]. Verdun (City) v. Sun Oil Co., [1952] 1 S.C.R. 222, consd. [para. Shell Canada Products Ltd. v. Vancouver (City), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 231; 163 N.R. 81; 41 B.C.A.C. 81; 66 W.A.C. 81, consd. [par......
  • R. v. Greenbaum (M.), (1993) 149 N.R. 114 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • February 25, 1993
    ...[paras. 21, 39]. Hamilton (City) v. Hamilton Distillery Co. (1907), 38 S.C.R. 239, appld. [para. 25]. Verdun (City) v. Sun Oil Co., [1952] 1 S.C.R. 222, appld. [para. McKay v. R., [1965] S.C.R. 798, appld. [para. 27]. Merritt v. Toronto (City) (1895), 22 O.A.R. 205, appld. [para. 28]. Morri......
  • Free World Trust v. Électro Santé Inc. et al., (2000) 263 N.R. 150 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • December 15, 2000
    ...26]. Beloit Canada Ltd. v. Valmet Oy (1986), 64 N.R. 287; 8 C.P.R.(3d) 289 (F.C.A.), consd. [para. 26]. R. v. Uhlemann Optical Co., [1952] 1 S.C.R. 143, refd to. [para. 27]. Domtar Ltd. v. MacMillan Bloedel Packaging Ltd. (1977), 33 C.P.R.(2d) 182 (F.C.T.D.), refd to. [para. 27]. Grip Print......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Is Commercial Success Still A Central Component Of The Test For Obviousness
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 27, 2012
    ...a patent is invalid for obviousness. The view of the Federal Court of Appeal on this issue may have evolved. Notes 1 R. v. Uhlemann (1951), 15 CPR 99 at 106 (SCC). 2 2010 FC 581. http://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/en/2010/2010fc581/2010fc581.html 3 Janssen-Ortho Inc. v. Novopharm Ltd. (2007), 59......