Morin v. Fortin, [1952] 1 SCR 167

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeRinfret, Thibaudeau; Taschereau, Robert; Rand, Ivan Cleveland; Locke, Charles Holland; Fauteux, Joseph Honoré Gérald
Date03 December 1951
Citation[1952] 1 SCR 167,1951 CanLII 53 (SCC),[1952] 1 SCR 222,1951 CanLII 51 (SCC),1951 CanLII 52 (SCC),[1952] 1 DLR 529,1951 CanLII 59 (SCC),[1952] 1 SCR 143,52 DTC 1014,[1952] 1 SCR 123,[1952] 1 DLR 401,15 CPR 99
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
75 practice notes
  • Janssen-Ortho Inc. et al. v. Apotex Inc. et al., (2008) 332 F.T.R. 1 (FC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 17, 2008
    ...(2008), 322 F.T.R. 86; 2008 FC 11, refd to. [para. 40]. King v. Uhlemann Optical Co., [1950] Ex. C.R. 142; 10 Fox Pat. C. 24, affd. [1952] 1 S.C.R. 143, refd to. [paras. 53, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical v. Mylan Laboratories (2004), 348 F. Supp.2d 713 (N.D. W. Va.), refd to. [para. 62]. Proc......
  • Eli Lilly & Co. et al. v. Apotex Inc., (2009) 351 F.T.R. 1 (FC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 13, 2008
    ...competition to a degree that in fact would be undue. To paraphrase what was said by Duff, C.J.C., in the Container Materials case, [1942], 1 D.L.R. 529, S.C.R. 147, 77 Can.C.C. 129, and to adapt the language of Kerwin, J., one examines the agreement arrived at, no matter whether anything wa......
  • Sources of Authority: Municipal Planning Statutes
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Land-use Planning
    • June 23, 2017
    ...89 (Ont CA). 161 2007 ONCA 55. See also Entreprises Sibeca Inc v Frelighsburg (Municipality ), 2004 SCC 61. 162 [1985] 1 SCR 368. 163 [1952] 1 SCR 222. 164 (1979), 25 NR 108 (SCC) [ Canadian Institute ]. Following the Canadian Institute decision, the Ontario Legislature retroactively valida......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Land-use Planning
    • June 23, 2017
    ...98, 524 Sturges v Bridgman (1879), 11 Ch D 852 (CA) .....................................153, 157−58 Sun Oil Co v Verdun (City) (1951), [1952] 1 SCR 222, [1952] 1 DLR 529, [1951] SCJ No 41 ....................................................88, 97, 100, 335 Suncor Energy Products Inc v Plym......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
68 cases
  • Janssen-Ortho Inc. et al. v. Apotex Inc. et al., (2008) 332 F.T.R. 1 (FC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 17, 2008
    ...(2008), 322 F.T.R. 86; 2008 FC 11, refd to. [para. 40]. King v. Uhlemann Optical Co., [1950] Ex. C.R. 142; 10 Fox Pat. C. 24, affd. [1952] 1 S.C.R. 143, refd to. [paras. 53, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical v. Mylan Laboratories (2004), 348 F. Supp.2d 713 (N.D. W. Va.), refd to. [para. 62]. Proc......
  • Eli Lilly & Co. et al. v. Apotex Inc., (2009) 351 F.T.R. 1 (FC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 13, 2008
    ...competition to a degree that in fact would be undue. To paraphrase what was said by Duff, C.J.C., in the Container Materials case, [1942], 1 D.L.R. 529, S.C.R. 147, 77 Can.C.C. 129, and to adapt the language of Kerwin, J., one examines the agreement arrived at, no matter whether anything wa......
  • Laurentide Motels Ltd. et al. v. Beauport (Ville) et al., (1989) 94 N.R. 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 20, 1989
    ...181, 217]. Phaneuf c. Corporation du Village de Saint-Hugues (1936), 61 B.R. 83, refd to. [para. 48]. City of Verdun c. Sun Oil Co., [1952] 1 S.C.R. 222, refd to. [para. 48]. Westminster Corporation v. London and North Western Railway Co., [1905] A.C. 426, refd to. [para. 48]. Authier c. Co......
  • Merck & Co. et al. v. Apotex Inc. et al., 2005 FC 755
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 11, 2005
    ...Tyre Saving Co., [1960] R.P.C. 59 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 115]. R. v. Uhlemann Optical Co. (1949), 11 C.P.R. 26 (Ex. Ct.), affd. (1951), 15 C.P.R. 99 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. Mahurkar v. Vas-Cath of Canada Ltd. and Gambro Canada Ltd. (1988), 16 F.T.R. 48; 18 C.P.R.(3d) 417 (T.D.), affd. (1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Is Commercial Success Still A Central Component Of The Test For Obviousness
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 27, 2012
    ...a patent is invalid for obviousness. The view of the Federal Court of Appeal on this issue may have evolved. Notes 1 R. v. Uhlemann (1951), 15 CPR 99 at 106 2 2010 FC 581. http://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/en/2010/2010fc581/2010fc581.html 3 Janssen-Ortho Inc. v. Novopharm Ltd. (2007), 59 CPR (4......
5 books & journal articles
  • Sources of Authority: Municipal Planning Statutes
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Land-use Planning
    • June 23, 2017
    ...89 (Ont CA). 161 2007 ONCA 55. See also Entreprises Sibeca Inc v Frelighsburg (Municipality ), 2004 SCC 61. 162 [1985] 1 SCR 368. 163 [1952] 1 SCR 222. 164 (1979), 25 NR 108 (SCC) [ Canadian Institute ]. Following the Canadian Institute decision, the Ontario Legislature retroactively valida......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Land-use Planning
    • June 23, 2017
    ...98, 524 Sturges v Bridgman (1879), 11 Ch D 852 (CA) .....................................153, 157−58 Sun Oil Co v Verdun (City) (1951), [1952] 1 SCR 222, [1952] 1 DLR 529, [1951] SCJ No 41 ....................................................88, 97, 100, 335 Suncor Energy Products Inc v Plym......
  • Patents
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Intellectual Property Law. Second Edition
    • June 15, 2011
    ...Ability,” online: http://works.bepress.com/michael_abramowicz/1. 309 Beloit , above note 54 at 295 (Fed. C.A.); R. v. Uhlemann , [1952] 1 S.C.R. 143 at 152 [ Uhlemann ]; Edison Bell Phonograph Corp. v. Smith (1894), 11 R.P.C. 389 at 398 (H.L.). 310 Hoechst II , above note 307 at 944 (S.C.R.......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Intellectual Property Law. Second Edition
    • June 15, 2011
    ...(3d) 289 ........ 6, 11 R. v. Stucky, 2009 ONCA 151, 71 C.P.R. (4th) 402, 65 C.R. (6th) 46 .... 26, 30, 153 R. v. Uhlemann (1951), [1952] 1 S.C.R. 143, 15 C.P.R. 99, [1951] S.C.J. No. 37 ...............................................................................329, 330 Rachalex Holding......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT