Mpoyi v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 251

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
Citation2018 FC 251
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Date07 March 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Ollivierre v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 599
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 25 Abril 2023
    ...I agree that this aspect of the decision must be returned for consideration (see Mpoyi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 251 at para 36; Li v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 754 at paras 10-11; Kassem v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 99 at para 13;......
  • Connell v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1316
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 29 Septiembre 2023
    ...determined that a failure to respond to a request for a TRP constitutes a reviewable error: Mpoyi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 251 at paras 32-33, 36 [Myopi]; Catindig v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 92 at para 36; Shah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigratio......
  • Shala v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 326
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 15 Abril 2021
    ...and Immigration), 2020 FC 8 (Norris J.), at paras 52-53, 61 and 67; and Mpoyi v Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 251 (Bell J.), at paras 31-33. For a similar remedy, see also Vaval v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 FC 160 (Noël J.). [69] Based on submi......
  • Lee v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 504
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 8 Abril 2020
    ...In this regard, it is worth bearing in mind Justice Bell’s advice in Mpoyi v Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 251: [36] The Officer was correct to conclude that he lacked the authorization to consider the Applicants’ alternative TRP request. However, his assertion tha......
4 cases
  • Ollivierre v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 599
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 25 Abril 2023
    ...I agree that this aspect of the decision must be returned for consideration (see Mpoyi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 251 at para 36; Li v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 754 at paras 10-11; Kassem v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 99 at para 13;......
  • Connell v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1316
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 29 Septiembre 2023
    ...determined that a failure to respond to a request for a TRP constitutes a reviewable error: Mpoyi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 251 at paras 32-33, 36 [Myopi]; Catindig v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 92 at para 36; Shah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigratio......
  • Shala v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 326
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 15 Abril 2021
    ...and Immigration), 2020 FC 8 (Norris J.), at paras 52-53, 61 and 67; and Mpoyi v Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 251 (Bell J.), at paras 31-33. For a similar remedy, see also Vaval v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 FC 160 (Noël J.). [69] Based on submi......
  • Lee v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 504
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 8 Abril 2020
    ...In this regard, it is worth bearing in mind Justice Bell’s advice in Mpoyi v Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2018 FC 251: [36] The Officer was correct to conclude that he lacked the authorization to consider the Applicants’ alternative TRP request. However, his assertion tha......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT