Murphy v. Murphy,

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeMacFarland, Hourigan and Benotto, JJ.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Citation[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 39,2015 ONCA 69,[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 39 (CA)
Date26 January 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
9 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 1 ' March 5, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 9, 2021
    ...c. 3, s. 15.2(6), Manchanda v. Thethi, 2016 ONCA 909, Abu-Saud v. Abu-Saud, 2020 ONCA 824, Dickie v. Dickie, 2007 SCC 8, Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 ONCA 69, Leskun v. Leskun, 2006 SCC 25, Cunha v. Cunha (1994), 99 B.C.L.R. 93 (S.C.), Meade v. Meade (2002), 31 R.F.L. (5th) 88 (Ont. S.C.), Purcar......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 19 ' 22, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 6, 2020
    ...v. Abu-Saud, 2020 ONCA 314 Keywords: Family Law, Support Order, Equalization, Rules of Civil Procedure, r. 63.01(1), Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 ONCA 69, Dickie v. Dickie (2006), 78 OR (3d) 1, Popa v. Popa, 2018 ONCA 972 Kitchen v. Brian Garratt (Garratt's Garage), 2020 ONCA 309 Keywords: Breach......
  • Abu-Saud v. Abu-Saud, 2020 ONCA 824
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • December 17, 2020
    ...for yourself how much to pay. This court has repeatedly admonished payors who do not pay the support pending appeal. In Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 ONCA 69, 56 R.F.L. (7th) 257, the court refused to entertain submissions from a party who had not paid support pending appeal. To do otherwise “woul......
  • Ahmadi v. Heydari, 2018 ONSC 2682
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 26, 2018
    ...Charlton, 2008 ONCJ 1, at para. 64. [18] Levely v. Levely, at para. 15; Manchanda v. Thethi, at paras. 71 and 75. [19] Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 ONCA 69, at para. 6. [20] Manchanda v. Thethi. [21] Ablett v. Horzempa, 2011 ONCA 633; Purcaru v. Purcaru, 2010 ONCA 92. [22] Purcaru v. Purcaru, 201......
  • Get Started for Free
6 cases
  • Abu-Saud v. Abu-Saud,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • December 17, 2020
    ...for yourself how much to pay. This court has repeatedly admonished payors who do not pay the support pending appeal. In Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 ONCA 69, 56 R.F.L. (7th) 257, the court refused to entertain submissions from a party who had not paid support pending appeal. To do otherwise “woul......
  • Ahmadi v. Heydari,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 26, 2018
    ...Charlton, 2008 ONCJ 1, at para. 64. [18] Levely v. Levely, at para. 15; Manchanda v. Thethi, at paras. 71 and 75. [19] Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 ONCA 69, at para. 6. [20] Manchanda v. Thethi. [21] Ablett v. Horzempa, 2011 ONCA 633; Purcaru v. Purcaru, 2010 ONCA 92. [22] Purcaru v. Purcaru, 201......
  • Manchanda v. Thethi,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • March 1, 2021
    ...to a party who is in default of court orders: see also Dickie v. Dickie, 2007 SCC 8, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 346, at para. 6. In Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 ONCA 69, 56 R.F.L. (7th) 257, the party in default was the respondent to the appeal, as is the case [5] After hearing the appellant’s submissions, ......
  • Abu-Saud v. Abu-Saud,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • May 22, 2020
    ...for yourself how much to pay. This court has repeatedly admonished payors who do not pay the support pending appeal. In Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 ONCA 69, 56 R.F.L. (7th) 257, the court refused to entertain submissions from a party who had not paid support pending appeal. To do otherwise “woul......
  • Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 1 ' March 5, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 9, 2021
    ...c. 3, s. 15.2(6), Manchanda v. Thethi, 2016 ONCA 909, Abu-Saud v. Abu-Saud, 2020 ONCA 824, Dickie v. Dickie, 2007 SCC 8, Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 ONCA 69, Leskun v. Leskun, 2006 SCC 25, Cunha v. Cunha (1994), 99 B.C.L.R. 93 (S.C.), Meade v. Meade (2002), 31 R.F.L. (5th) 88 (Ont. S.C.), Purcar......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 19 ' 22, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 6, 2020
    ...v. Abu-Saud, 2020 ONCA 314 Keywords: Family Law, Support Order, Equalization, Rules of Civil Procedure, r. 63.01(1), Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 ONCA 69, Dickie v. Dickie (2006), 78 OR (3d) 1, Popa v. Popa, 2018 ONCA 972 Kitchen v. Brian Garratt (Garratt's Garage), 2020 ONCA 309 Keywords: Breach......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 26-30, 2015)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 9, 2015
    ...errors, a new trial would not be justified. Even without her errors, she would necessarily have reached the same result. Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 ONCA 69 [Justice, Justice and Justice Counsel: Edwin A. Flak and Amit S. Dror, for the appellant Gary S. Joseph and Ryan M. Kniznik, for the respon......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT