Murphy v. Murphy, [2015] O.A.C. Uned. 39
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | MacFarland, Hourigan and Benotto, JJ.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Subject Matter | COURTS,PRACTICE,ARBITRATION,FAMILY LAW |
| Citation | [2015] O.A.C. Uned. 39,2015 ONCA 69,[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 39 (CA) |
| Date | 26 January 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 1 ' March 5, 2021)
...c. 3, s. 15.2(6), Manchanda v. Thethi, 2016 ONCA 909, Abu-Saud v. Abu-Saud, 2020 ONCA 824, Dickie v. Dickie, 2007 SCC 8, Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 ONCA 69, Leskun v. Leskun, 2006 SCC 25, Cunha v. Cunha (1994), 99 B.C.L.R. 93 (S.C.), Meade v. Meade (2002), 31 R.F.L. (5th) 88 (Ont. S.C.), Purcar......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 19 ' 22, 2020)
...v. Abu-Saud, 2020 ONCA 314 Keywords: Family Law, Support Order, Equalization, Rules of Civil Procedure, r. 63.01(1), Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 ONCA 69, Dickie v. Dickie (2006), 78 OR (3d) 1, Popa v. Popa, 2018 ONCA 972 Kitchen v. Brian Garratt (Garratt's Garage), 2020 ONCA 309 Keywords: Breach......
-
Abu-Saud v. Abu-Saud,
...for yourself how much to pay. This court has repeatedly admonished payors who do not pay the support pending appeal. In Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 ONCA 69, 56 R.F.L. (7th) 257, the court refused to entertain submissions from a party who had not paid support pending appeal. To do otherwise “woul......
-
Manchanda v. Thethi,
...to a party who is in default of court orders: see also Dickie v. Dickie, 2007 SCC 8, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 346, at para. 6. In Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 ONCA 69, 56 R.F.L. (7th) 257, the party in default was the respondent to the appeal, as is the case [5] After hearing the appellant’s submissions, ......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Abu-Saud v. Abu-Saud,
...for yourself how much to pay. This court has repeatedly admonished payors who do not pay the support pending appeal. In Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 ONCA 69, 56 R.F.L. (7th) 257, the court refused to entertain submissions from a party who had not paid support pending appeal. To do otherwise “woul......
-
Manchanda v. Thethi,
...to a party who is in default of court orders: see also Dickie v. Dickie, 2007 SCC 8, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 346, at para. 6. In Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 ONCA 69, 56 R.F.L. (7th) 257, the party in default was the respondent to the appeal, as is the case [5] After hearing the appellant’s submissions, ......
-
Abu-Saud v. Abu-Saud, 2020 ONCA 314
...for yourself how much to pay. This court has repeatedly admonished payors who do not pay the support pending appeal. In Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 ONCA 69, 56 R.F.L. (7th) 257, the court refused to entertain submissions from a party who had not paid support pending appeal. To do otherwise “woul......
-
Salehi v. Tawoosi, 2016 ONCA 986
...it would not have been “ongoing” in any meaningful sense of the word, as it would have lasted for perhaps a day or two. Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 ONCA 69, 56 R.F.L. (7th) 257, which the appellant also seeks to rely on, does not assist the appellant. Murphy underscores the high hurdle the movin......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 1 ' March 5, 2021)
...c. 3, s. 15.2(6), Manchanda v. Thethi, 2016 ONCA 909, Abu-Saud v. Abu-Saud, 2020 ONCA 824, Dickie v. Dickie, 2007 SCC 8, Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 ONCA 69, Leskun v. Leskun, 2006 SCC 25, Cunha v. Cunha (1994), 99 B.C.L.R. 93 (S.C.), Meade v. Meade (2002), 31 R.F.L. (5th) 88 (Ont. S.C.), Purcar......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 19 ' 22, 2020)
...v. Abu-Saud, 2020 ONCA 314 Keywords: Family Law, Support Order, Equalization, Rules of Civil Procedure, r. 63.01(1), Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 ONCA 69, Dickie v. Dickie (2006), 78 OR (3d) 1, Popa v. Popa, 2018 ONCA 972 Kitchen v. Brian Garratt (Garratt's Garage), 2020 ONCA 309 Keywords: Breach......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 26-30, 2015)
...errors, a new trial would not be justified. Even without her errors, she would necessarily have reached the same result. Murphy v. Murphy, 2015 ONCA 69 [Justice, Justice and Justice Counsel: Edwin A. Flak and Amit S. Dror, for the appellant Gary S. Joseph and Ryan M. Kniznik, for the respon......