Mussa v. Imam, 2021 ONCJ 92
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | JUSTICE S.B. SHERR |
| Docket Number | D31305/19 |
| Citation | 2021 ONCJ 92 |
| Court | Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada) |
| Date | 17 February 2021 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
L.B. v. P.E.,
...costs (subrule 18 (16)) or, in assessing the reasonableness of a party under sub-clause (iii) of subrule 24 (12) (a). See: Mussa v. Imam, 2021 ONCJ 92. [13] The onus of proving that the offer is as or more favourable than the trial result is on the person making the ......
-
Lalonde v. Lalonde,
...costs (subrule 18 (16)) or, in assessing the reasonableness of a party under sub-clause (iii) of subrule 24 (12) (a). See: Mussa v. Imam, 2021 ONCJ 92. [18] The onus of proving that the offer is as or more favourable than the trial result is on the person making the ......
-
J.N. v. C.G.,
...v. Public Accountants Council of Ontario 2004 CanLII 14579 (Ont CA); Arthur v. Arthur, 2019 ONSC 938 (SCJ); Mussa v. Imam 2021 ONCJ 92 [24] A party’s expectation as to their likely exposure to costs if they are unsuccessful sh......
-
Rogers v. Porga,
...is exercising its discretion over costs pursuant to paragraph (iii) of clause 24 (12) (a) of the rules. Mussa v. Imam 2021 ONCJ 92 (OCJ). [18] Rule 24(4) provides that in some circumstances a successful party can be deprived o......
4 cases
-
L.B. v. P.E.,
...costs (subrule 18 (16)) or, in assessing the reasonableness of a party under sub-clause (iii) of subrule 24 (12) (a). See: Mussa v. Imam, 2021 ONCJ 92. [13] The onus of proving that the offer is as or more favourable than the trial result is on the person making the ......
-
Lalonde v. Lalonde,
...costs (subrule 18 (16)) or, in assessing the reasonableness of a party under sub-clause (iii) of subrule 24 (12) (a). See: Mussa v. Imam, 2021 ONCJ 92. [18] The onus of proving that the offer is as or more favourable than the trial result is on the person making the ......
-
J.N. v. C.G.,
...v. Public Accountants Council of Ontario 2004 CanLII 14579 (Ont CA); Arthur v. Arthur, 2019 ONSC 938 (SCJ); Mussa v. Imam 2021 ONCJ 92 [24] A party’s expectation as to their likely exposure to costs if they are unsuccessful sh......
-
Rogers v. Porga,
...is exercising its discretion over costs pursuant to paragraph (iii) of clause 24 (12) (a) of the rules. Mussa v. Imam 2021 ONCJ 92 (OCJ). [18] Rule 24(4) provides that in some circumstances a successful party can be deprived o......