N.E.T. v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2018 BCCA 380
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Willcock,The Honourable Madam Justice Fenlon,The Honourable Madam Justice Fisher |
Citation | 2018 BCCA 380 |
Date | 17 October 2018 |
Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
Docket Number | CA44844 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Adam v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 2018 BCCA 482
...British Columbia, 2017 SCC 32 at paras. 47, 50; R. v. Ambrosi, 2014 BCCA 325 at para. 18; N.E.T. v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2018 BCCA 380 at para. [24] If the judge correctly interpreted the relevant provisions, the application of his interpretation to findings supported by the......
-
Rana v Gill, 2018 BCSC 1998
...the other was the aggressor. [35] The Court in N.E.T. v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2018 BCCA 380 at para. 27, explained the elements of assault as An assault “is the intentional creation of the apprehension of imminent harmful......
-
Thomson v. Her Majesty the Queen in the Right of British Columbia,
...of the Limitation Act did not apply. Justice Meiklem’s reasons are indexed at 2017 BCSC 1742. This Court, in reasons indexed at 2018 BCCA 380, affirmed Justice Meiklem’s decision. The appellant’s application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was refused......
-
Thomson v. British Columbia (Interior Health), 2020 BCSC 1591
...by a limitation period: N.T. v. British Columbia, 2017 BCSC 1742 (“trial decision”), aff’d N.E.T. v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2018 BCCA 380 (“appeal decision”), leave to appeal ref’d [2018] S.C.C.A. No. 537. [3] For the reasons set out below, I conclude that Mr. Thomson’s claim ......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Adam v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 2018 BCCA 482
...British Columbia, 2017 SCC 32 at paras. 47, 50; R. v. Ambrosi, 2014 BCCA 325 at para. 18; N.E.T. v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2018 BCCA 380 at para. [24] If the judge correctly interpreted the relevant provisions, the application of his interpretation to findings supported by the......
-
Rana v Gill, 2018 BCSC 1998
...the other was the aggressor. [35] The Court in N.E.T. v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2018 BCCA 380 at para. 27, explained the elements of assault as An assault “is the intentional creation of the apprehension of imminent harmful......
-
Thomson v. Her Majesty the Queen in the Right of British Columbia,
...of the Limitation Act did not apply. Justice Meiklem’s reasons are indexed at 2017 BCSC 1742. This Court, in reasons indexed at 2018 BCCA 380, affirmed Justice Meiklem’s decision. The appellant’s application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was refused......
-
Thomson v. British Columbia (Interior Health), 2020 BCSC 1591
...by a limitation period: N.T. v. British Columbia, 2017 BCSC 1742 (“trial decision”), aff’d N.E.T. v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2018 BCCA 380 (“appeal decision”), leave to appeal ref’d [2018] S.C.C.A. No. 537. [3] For the reasons set out below, I conclude that Mr. Thomson’s claim ......
Request a trial to view additional results