O.N. v. T.M., [2007] Nunavut Cases (CJ) 18

JudgeKilpatrick, J.
CourtNunavut Court of Justice (Canada)
Case DateAugust 30, 2007
JurisdictionNunavut
Citations[2007] Nunavut Cases (CJ) 18;2007 NUCJ 18

O.N. v. T.M., [2007] Nunavut Cases (CJ) 18

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2007] Nunavut Cases TBEd. SE.180

O.N. (applicant) v. T.M. (respondent)

(08-03115 CHL; 2007 NUCJ 18)

Indexed As: O.N. v. T.M.

Nunavut Court of Justice

Iqaluit

Kilpatrick, J.

September 10, 2007.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Editor's note: certain names in the following case have been initialized or the case otherwise edited to prevent the disclosure of identities where required by law, publication ban, Maritime Law Book's editorial policy or otherwise.

Family Law - Topic 4017

Divorce - Corollary relief - Maintenance and awards - Awards - Variation of periodic payments or lump sum award - See paragraphs 16 to 27.

Family Law - Topic 4021.4

Divorce - Corollary relief - Maintenance and awards - Awards - Considerations - Ability to pay (incl. potential to earn income and calculation of income) - See paragraphs 16 to 27.

Family Law - Topic 4050

Divorce - Corollary relief - Maintenance - Enforcement - Payment or cancellation of arrears of maintenance (incl. interest) - See paragraphs 28 to 32.

Counsel:

Vernon Finch, for the applicant;

Esther Oh, for the respondent.

This application was heard on August 30, 2007, by Kilpatrick, J., of the Nunavut Court of Justice, who released the following judgment on September 10, 2007.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • Coates v. Watson, 2017 ONCJ 454
    • Canada
    • Ontario Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • July 7, 2017
    ...majority or leaves a state of dependency. These solemn obligations are not readily given up. They cannot be abandoned. M.(T.) v. N.(0.), 2007 NUCJ 18, 43 233 at 9 – 11, Tab 31 Parent’s obligation to support their children has been recognized by the Supreme Court of Canada. According to the ......
1 cases
  • Coates v. Watson, 2017 ONCJ 454
    • Canada
    • Ontario Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • July 7, 2017
    ...majority or leaves a state of dependency. These solemn obligations are not readily given up. They cannot be abandoned. M.(T.) v. N.(0.), 2007 NUCJ 18, 43 233 at 9 – 11, Tab 31 Parent’s obligation to support their children has been recognized by the Supreme Court of Canada. According to the ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT