NADEAU v. NADEAU, 2020 SKQB 136
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | CROOKS J. |
| Citation | 2020 SKQB 136 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Docket Number | QBG 2760 of 2016 |
| Date | 13 May 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
ATRIUM MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION v. HEE JUNG KOH,
...Atrium’s position is supported by the interpretation of s. 10 by Crooks J. in Nadeau v Nadeau, 2020 SKQB 136 [31] While “default” is not defined in the legislation, it is defined as follows in Black’s Law Dictionary, 11th ed, s.v. “default ......
-
Princess Homes Ltd. v. Guenther,
...that a demand for payment in full dated August 12, 2016 was served upon the Guenthers by regular mail. He relies on Nadeau v Nadeau, 2020 SKQB 136 (affirmed by the court of appeal in 2021 SKCA 69), which confirms that the limitation period begins to run from the date of demand rather than t......
2 cases
-
ATRIUM MORTGAGE INVESTMENT CORPORATION v. HEE JUNG KOH,
...Atrium’s position is supported by the interpretation of s. 10 by Crooks J. in Nadeau v Nadeau, 2020 SKQB 136 [31] While “default” is not defined in the legislation, it is defined as follows in Black’s Law Dictionary, 11th ed, s.v. “default ......
-
Princess Homes Ltd. v. Guenther,
...that a demand for payment in full dated August 12, 2016 was served upon the Guenthers by regular mail. He relies on Nadeau v Nadeau, 2020 SKQB 136 (affirmed by the court of appeal in 2021 SKCA 69), which confirms that the limitation period begins to run from the date of demand rather than t......