National Gypsum (Canada) Ltd. v. Veinot, 2019 NSSC 326
| Judge | Honourable Justice Ann E. Smith |
| Court | Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
| Case Date | November 14, 2019 |
| Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
| Citations | 2019 NSSC 326 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Charles v. Xu,
...(Halifax) Inc., 2016 NSSC 274; Manga Hotels (Halifax) Inc. v. Armour Developments Ltd., 2017 NSCA 77; National Gypsum Co. v. Veinot, 2019 NSSC 326; Armour Development Ltd. v. Manga Hotels (Halifax) Inc., 2016 NSSC 274; Mason v. Partridge, 2005 NSCA 144; Balser v. Wiles, 2013 NSSC 278; ......
-
MacDonald v. Korol,
...Sections 74 and 75 of the LRA, as well as Podgorski were further considered in National Gypsum (Canada) Ltd. v. Veinot, 2019 NSSC 326. In that case, the applicant had migrated its property and the respondents claimed in adverse possession after the ten year period expired under s. 74(......
-
Urban Farm Museum Society of Spryfield v. Auby,
...they owned the Claimed Area. 4. This letter stands in stark contrast to the letters in National Gypsum (Canada) Ltd. v. Veinot, 2019 NSSC 326 and R. B. Ferguson Construction Limited v. Nova Scotia, 1988 CarswellNS 460, which were held to acknowledge ownership and thereby reset the clock. In......
-
Grant v. Halifax Regional Water Commission, 2021 NSCA 22
...[56] A similar argument was made by the respondents in National Gypsum (Canada) Ltd. v. Veinot, 2019 NSSC 326. In that case, the court found the owner of an adjacent parcel can establish the claim under section 75(1), but an agent acting on their own init......
4 cases
-
Charles v. Xu,
...(Halifax) Inc., 2016 NSSC 274; Manga Hotels (Halifax) Inc. v. Armour Developments Ltd., 2017 NSCA 77; National Gypsum Co. v. Veinot, 2019 NSSC 326; Armour Development Ltd. v. Manga Hotels (Halifax) Inc., 2016 NSSC 274; Mason v. Partridge, 2005 NSCA 144; Balser v. Wiles, 2013 NSSC 278; ......
-
MacDonald v. Korol,
...Sections 74 and 75 of the LRA, as well as Podgorski were further considered in National Gypsum (Canada) Ltd. v. Veinot, 2019 NSSC 326. In that case, the applicant had migrated its property and the respondents claimed in adverse possession after the ten year period expired under s. 74(......
-
Urban Farm Museum Society of Spryfield v. Auby,
...they owned the Claimed Area. 4. This letter stands in stark contrast to the letters in National Gypsum (Canada) Ltd. v. Veinot, 2019 NSSC 326 and R. B. Ferguson Construction Limited v. Nova Scotia, 1988 CarswellNS 460, which were held to acknowledge ownership and thereby reset the clock. In......
-
Grant v. Halifax Regional Water Commission, 2021 NSCA 22
...[56] A similar argument was made by the respondents in National Gypsum (Canada) Ltd. v. Veinot, 2019 NSSC 326. In that case, the court found the owner of an adjacent parcel can establish the claim under section 75(1), but an agent acting on their own init......