Nawara v. Riverstone, 2019 ONSC 111
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | L.C. Sheard |
| Citation | 2019 ONSC 111 |
| Docket Number | 17-61122 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Date | 07 January 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
1182054 B.C. Ltd. v. Penny, 2021 BCSC 206
...Zhang, 2013 BCCA 52, Liu; Redstone; Dar v. The Yards Corporation, 2018 ONSC 5043, aff’d 2019 ONCA 362; and Nawara v. Riverstone, 2019 ONSC 111. [47] Finally, the defendant made a submission that the plaintiff's conduct in the transaction......
-
Wang v. 2426483 Ontario Limited, 2020 ONSC 3368
...(4th) 127, at para. 66; Dar v. The Yards Corporation, 2018 ONSC 5043, 299 A.C.W.S. (3d) 214, at paras. 12 and 91; Nawara v. Riverstone, 2019 ONSC 111, 300 A.C.W.S. (3d) 882 at para. 26; Greco v. Padovani, 2019 ONSC 4105, 307 A.C.W.S. (3d) 653, at para. 30. The addition of the occupancy fees......
-
Why Do We Have Deposits?
...was $10,225,000.00, and the Ontario Court of Appeal found that a deposit of $750,000 was not unconscionable. In Nawara v. Riverstone, 2019 ONSC 111, deposits totaling $82,498.50 on a purchase price of $359,999 were not found to be unconscionable even though the seller ended up selling the u......
2 cases
-
1182054 B.C. Ltd. v. Penny, 2021 BCSC 206
...Zhang, 2013 BCCA 52, Liu; Redstone; Dar v. The Yards Corporation, 2018 ONSC 5043, aff’d 2019 ONCA 362; and Nawara v. Riverstone, 2019 ONSC 111. [47] Finally, the defendant made a submission that the plaintiff's conduct in the transaction......
-
Wang v. 2426483 Ontario Limited, 2020 ONSC 3368
...(4th) 127, at para. 66; Dar v. The Yards Corporation, 2018 ONSC 5043, 299 A.C.W.S. (3d) 214, at paras. 12 and 91; Nawara v. Riverstone, 2019 ONSC 111, 300 A.C.W.S. (3d) 882 at para. 26; Greco v. Padovani, 2019 ONSC 4105, 307 A.C.W.S. (3d) 653, at para. 30. The addition of the occupancy fees......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Why Do We Have Deposits?
...was $10,225,000.00, and the Ontario Court of Appeal found that a deposit of $750,000 was not unconscionable. In Nawara v. Riverstone, 2019 ONSC 111, deposits totaling $82,498.50 on a purchase price of $359,999 were not found to be unconscionable even though the seller ended up selling the u......