Nestor v. Nestor, 2018 BCCA 453
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Saunders |
| Citation | 2018 BCCA 453 |
| Date | 20 November 2018 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Docket Number | CA45622 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Nicholl v. Nicholl, 2020 BCCA 173
...the applicable legislation: Yu v. Jordan, 2012 BCCA 367 at paras. 54–56; Brown v. Brown, 2020 BCCA 53 at paras. 96–98; Nester v. Nester, 2018 BCCA 453 (Chambers). This is so courts can respect the differences in the two regimes. There is no need for litigants or courts to refer to both the ......
-
Briggs v. Kasdorf,
...provisions of the Divorce Act, as the paramount legislation: Hejzlar v. Mitchell-Hejzlar, 2011 BCCA 230, at para. 20; Nestor v. Nestor, 2018 BCCA 453, at para. 8, and there is no reason to apply the FLA. [42] Although not expressly stated under s. 15.1 of the Divorce Act, support may be awa......
-
Lipskaya v. Guo,
...are currently not limited appeal orders and do not require leave to appeal, pursuant to s. 21(1) of that Act. See Nestor v. Nestor, 2018 BCCA 453. [27] Justice Skolrood issued his orders in the following [53] I mak......
-
This Month In NS Family Law ' October 2021
...under the Rules, and the 30-day limitation period under the Divorce Act. The mother relied on federal paramountcy from Nestor v. Nestor, 2018 BCCA 453, and argued that the Divorce Act limitation should be The Court of Appeal relied on the analysis from Elgner v. Elgner, 2011 ONCA 483. The C......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
-
Nicholl v. Nicholl, 2020 BCCA 173
...the applicable legislation: Yu v. Jordan, 2012 BCCA 367 at paras. 54–56; Brown v. Brown, 2020 BCCA 53 at paras. 96–98; Nester v. Nester, 2018 BCCA 453 (Chambers). This is so courts can respect the differences in the two regimes. There is no need for litigants or courts to refer to both the ......
-
Briggs v. Kasdorf,
...provisions of the Divorce Act, as the paramount legislation: Hejzlar v. Mitchell-Hejzlar, 2011 BCCA 230, at para. 20; Nestor v. Nestor, 2018 BCCA 453, at para. 8, and there is no reason to apply the FLA. [42] Although not expressly stated under s. 15.1 of the Divorce Act, support may be awa......
-
Lipskaya v. Guo,
...are currently not limited appeal orders and do not require leave to appeal, pursuant to s. 21(1) of that Act. See Nestor v. Nestor, 2018 BCCA 453. [27] Justice Skolrood issued his orders in the following [53] I mak......
2 firm's commentaries
-
This Month In NS Family Law ' October 2021
...under the Rules, and the 30-day limitation period under the Divorce Act. The mother relied on federal paramountcy from Nestor v. Nestor, 2018 BCCA 453, and argued that the Divorce Act limitation should be The Court of Appeal relied on the analysis from Elgner v. Elgner, 2011 ONCA 483. The C......
-
This Month In NS Family Law ' October 2021
...under the Rules, and the 30-day limitation period under the Divorce Act. The mother relied on federal paramountcy from Nestor v. Nestor, 2018 BCCA 453, and argued that the Divorce Act limitation should be The Court of Appeal relied on the analysis from Elgner v. Elgner, 2011 ONCA 483. The C......