A New Direction, 1906-18
Author | C. Ian Kyer |
Pages | 123-158 |
M Chapter N
A NEW DIRECTION,
IBpresident of Canada Permanent Mortgage Corporation,
issuedawarningtohisshareholdersthatwasverymuchinthescallycon
servative tradition of William Gooderham and James Gooderham Worts.
Although it was an unrivalled period of expansion Beay noted that
“speculation, high prices, extravagant living and extended credits” were
prevalent. He advised that it was not a “time for the mariner at the helm of a
businessshiptothrowoutareefinhismainsailbutrathertodoublereefit
against storms that may be gathering.”
David Fasken did not share his mentor’s caution. Having mastered busi
nessmanagementheintendedtograspthehelmofthelawrmandsailit
inanewdirectionasquicklyaspossiblebyapplyingthesameprinciples
and rigour. But this was a partnership and he needed his part ners’ consent.
So he began by asking them to commit the terms of their partnership to
paper. David wanted the new agreement to give formal recognition to the
enormouschangesthathadoccurredinthermsincetomakeit
clearthatalthoughBeayandBlackstockremainedtherstnamesonthe
leerheadhewasinchargeNotonlywouldawrienagreementhavebeen
seen as unnecess ary just a few short years earlier, given the ties that knit the
partnerstogetherbuttheprecisetermsofthisdocumentwouldnever
have been acceptable to those partners.
At rst it seemed that David wouldprevail O n September he
convincedBeayChadwickRiddellHarperArmstrongAlexFaskenand
ナニネLawyersFamiliesandBusinesses
Hugh Rose to join him in signing a partnership agreement that made them
copartnersforveyearsinthepracticeandprofessionofbarristerssolici
torsandnotariespublicunderthermnameofBeayBlackstockFasken
RiddellUnfortunatelyforDavidtobebindingtheagreementrequiredthe
signatures of all the par tners and two of them, Percy Galt and Ross Gooder
ham, refused to sign. They saw that David’s proposal would give him a
levelofcontrolthatevenBeayhadneverenjoyedTheelderFaskenwas
describedintheagreementasthemanagerofthebusinessofthermAs
such he could decide what line of work was to be undertaken by each part
ner, severely curtailing their independence. They also saw that they were
todedicatethemselvestothepracticeoflawthereweretobenomore
socialbueriesorparttimepractitionerswhoranotherbusinessesonthe
side. Partners were no longer to be free to come and go as they pleased. Each
would be entitled to one month’s holiday during the year. If absent beyond
thatthedelinquentpartnerwastopaytothermsuchamountforeachday
as the majority in interest of the partners thought appropriate. Riddell was
permied to take two months without deduction on condition that if he
shallargueanycaseinEnglandbeforethePrivyCouncilduringthesaid
months he shall not claim any extra vacation on th at account.”
Several of the provisions seem to have been intended to ensure that t here
would not be another George Blackstock. The agreement stated that no part
ner was to be a candidate for or contest any municipal, parliamentary, or any
other public election and that the practice was to be carr ied on in the City of
TorontoandeachpartnerwasrequiredtoresidethereSomeonelikeBlack
stockwhohadpoliticalaspirationsandwhospentliletimeinTorontowas
no longer welcome. Ironically it was probably Fasken’s insistence on these
measures that brought Blackstock back to Toronto and his law practice. In
andweagainseehisnameascounselfortherminseveralcases
that made their way to the Supreme Court of Canada. But his renewed dedi
cationtohisTorontolawpracticewasrelativelyshortlivedandbyhe
had dropped from sight once again.
Even David Fasken himself was not to be entirely immune from the
requirementsoutlinedintheagreementHewaspermiedtomaintainhis
arrangement with the Excelsior Life Insura nce Company and to receive “the
emoluments therefrom,” provided that if he looked after the business of that
company during the day he had to arrange for a proper retainer to be paid to
thelawrmtocompensateitforhistime
ANewDirectionナニノ
Beaywasshownasapartnerbuthisvaluewasingoodwillhisname
and contacts He would not be required to perform any actual solicitor
workbutwastousehisbestendeavourstoprocurebusinessfortherm
and to giveall of the i nuencehe could towards the promotion of the
interestsofthermHewasnothowevertointerferewithDavidsoper
ationofthermHecouldretainanyfeesfromactingasadirectorortrustee
and any amounts that he received from any other business outside of the
rmwithwhichhemightbeconnectedhardlysurprisingwhenonenotes
thathedidnotreceiveanyincomefromthermHisemolumentsand
“the use of a room at the north east end of the building without cha rge” were
all that he got.
In an aempt to placate Ross Gooderham the agreement also made
special provisions for him. On George Gooderham’s death, Ross had been
appointedexecutoroftheestateHewastobepermiedtoretainanycom
missions to which he was entitled as executor as well as any director’s fees
payable to him for serving on any company’s board in connection with the
estateHewashowevernottoparticipateinanyfeesreceivedbytherm
from his father’s estate.
Thenetprotsofthepracticeweretobedividedamongthepartnersas
follows:
OfthersteachyearDavidFaskenandWilliamRenwickRid
dellweretoreceiveeachAlexFaskenandallothers
eitheror
Prots over were to be divided in varying percentages de
pendingonthelevelofprotachievedForexampleiftheprotsfell
betweenandDavidFaskenandRiddellwouldeach
getpercentbutiftheprotswereovertheyreceived
onlypercentInthiswayFaskenandRiddellwouldbecompen
satedforthebasebusinessthattheybroughttothermbuttherewas
some incentive to the younger partners to work hard and bring in new
business.
Thedraftagreementcreatedarippleofdiscontentthroughoutthe
rmManybegantoactivelyseekoutotheropportunitiesWithhisfatherno
longeractiveinthermandDavidFaskeninchargeBeayssonCharles
William, left. Young Robert McKay also left. These departures paled in com
parisonwiththelossthatoccurredonOctoberhoweverwhenRid
dell accepted an appointment to the bench.WithNesbigoneandGeorge
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
