Newell v. Allen, [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 6681 (SC)

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeV.J. Mackinnon, J.
Citation[2012] O.T.C. Uned. 6681 (SC),2012 ONSC 6681,[2012] O.T.C. Uned. 6681
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Subject MatterEQUITY,FAMILY LAW,PRACTICE,CONTRACTS
Date26 November 2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Marriage
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 Julio 2022
    ...476; see also PS v HR, 2016 BCSC 2071; Bath v Bath, 2002 NLCA 21. See Mastromatteo v Dayball, [2011] OJ No 1600 (Sup Ct); Newell v Allen, 2012 ONSC 6681. But see contra: Marcon v Cicchelli (1993), 47 RFL (3d) 403 (Ont Gen Div); for criticism of this conclusion, see JG McLeod, “Marcon v Cicc......
  • Marriage
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • 3 Agosto 2020
    ...476; see also PS v HR, 2016 BCSC 2071; Bath v Bath, 2002 NLCA 21. See Mastromatteo v Dayball, [2011] OJ No 1600 (Sup Ct); Newell v Allen, 2012 ONSC 6681. But see contra: Marcon v Cicchelli (1993), 47 RFL (3d) 403 (Ont Gen Div); for criticism of this conclusion, see JG McLeod, “Marcon v Cicc......
  • King v. Mann, 2020 ONSC 108
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 7 Enero 2020
    ...only would that evidence have been highly emotional and contentious, more importantly it would have been irrelevant: see Newell v. Allen, 2012 ONSC 6681 at paragraph [33]           As an aside, the applicant indicated that he paid $3,500 for......
  • Patel v. Patel, 2016 ABQB 64
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 28 Enero 2016
    ...such as Ontario, appear to have abolished the right to sue in contract for breach of a promise to marry: see, Newell v Allen 2012 ONSC 6681, at para. 20. Alberta does not appear to be one of those jurisdictions. The action of breach of contract to marry appears to survive in provinces like ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
  • King v. Mann, 2020 ONSC 108
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 7 Enero 2020
    ...only would that evidence have been highly emotional and contentious, more importantly it would have been irrelevant: see Newell v. Allen, 2012 ONSC 6681 at paragraph [33]           As an aside, the applicant indicated that he paid $3,500 for......
  • Patel v. Patel, 2016 ABQB 64
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 28 Enero 2016
    ...such as Ontario, appear to have abolished the right to sue in contract for breach of a promise to marry: see, Newell v Allen 2012 ONSC 6681, at para. 20. Alberta does not appear to be one of those jurisdictions. The action of breach of contract to marry appears to survive in provinces like ......
  • Lamacchia v. Carullo,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 10 Noviembre 2022
    ...v. Carrière, 2016 ONSC 7523. [33] Exhibit 16. [34] R.S.O. 1990, c. M.3. [35] 2020 ONSC 108 [36] [1997] Q.J. 4159 (Que. S.C.) [37] 2012 ONSC 6681. [38] Newell, at para [39] See, for example, Virc v. Blair, 2016 ONSC 49, aff’d  2017 ONCA 394, at paras. 154 to 157 on jewellery......
2 books & journal articles
  • Marriage
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 Julio 2022
    ...476; see also PS v HR, 2016 BCSC 2071; Bath v Bath, 2002 NLCA 21. See Mastromatteo v Dayball, [2011] OJ No 1600 (Sup Ct); Newell v Allen, 2012 ONSC 6681. But see contra: Marcon v Cicchelli (1993), 47 RFL (3d) 403 (Ont Gen Div); for criticism of this conclusion, see JG McLeod, “Marcon v Cicc......
  • Marriage
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • 3 Agosto 2020
    ...476; see also PS v HR, 2016 BCSC 2071; Bath v Bath, 2002 NLCA 21. See Mastromatteo v Dayball, [2011] OJ No 1600 (Sup Ct); Newell v Allen, 2012 ONSC 6681. But see contra: Marcon v Cicchelli (1993), 47 RFL (3d) 403 (Ont Gen Div); for criticism of this conclusion, see JG McLeod, “Marcon v Cicc......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT